AI Promo Design
REMOTE · AIPROMODESIGN.COM
Design custom t-shirts, hoodies, caps, mugs and totes, price an order, and link to order it.
Available components
Last scanned (12 hours ago)
Scores higher than 81% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1079 tokens (~179/item across 6 items; 5 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
- Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage94
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 82% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities73
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Checks we ran (14)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
- Capabilities
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://aipromodesign.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=aipromodesign.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 8 Sept 2026 | 7 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 578b7a61845b0e470e95e8bc5ee71ba6 |
| SANs: aipromodesign.com, www.aipromodesign.com, *.www.aipromodesign.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of aipromodesign.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| aipromodesign.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(self), microphone=(self), geolocation=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://aipromodesign.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://aipromodesign.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://aipromodesign.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
design_item Design artwork for an item ~316
Make a print-ready design from a short description, for one item in one color. Returns a watermarked preview of the design on the item, a design_id for revise_design and open_in_studio, and how many free designs are left. Describe the ARTWORK only ("a snarling wolf head, two colors"), not the garment: the garment is chosen with `item` and `color`. Each call makes one design and spends one from the allowance (10 as a visitor, then 25 a day on an aipromodesign.com account). Pass back the `visitor` value from the previous answer so the allowance follows the customer.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| brief | string | yes | What the artwork shows, in the customer's words. The artwork alone - no shirt, no mug. |
| color | string | – | The item's color by name (Navy, Black, White, Forest Green, Sport Gray, Red, Royal, Maroon...). Defaults to White. |
| item | string | – | Item key or the word a customer would use (tee, hoodie, mug, tote, cap, polo, long sleeve, crewneck, performance tee, women's tee, youth hoodie, notebook, tumbler). Use list_items for the full set. D… |
| surface | string | – | Which print area: front (default), back, left_sleeve, right_sleeve. The design is sized for it. |
| visitor | string | – | The visitor value from an earlier answer in this conversation, if there was one. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_items What can be printed ~104
The items a design can go on: key, name, the blank it is printed on, price per piece, colors, sizes, and the print areas with their sizes in inches. Call this before quoting or when the customer asks what is available. Prices are per piece in US dollars; the first print area is in the price and each further area adds a per-piece charge shown here. Designing is free; nothing is charged until the customer orders on aipromodesign.com.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
open_in_studio Continue on aipromodesign.com ~123
A link that opens the aipromodesign.com designer with the design already on the item in that color and, when sizes are given, the order lines filled in. The customer finishes there: more edits with the designer's own tools, other print areas, names and numbers, sizes collected from a group, and checkout. Use it when the customer is ready to order or wants to keep working. Nothing is charged by opening it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lines | array | yes | – |
| visitor | string | – | The visitor value from an earlier answer, if there was one. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
quote_order Price an order ~76
What an order would cost: per piece by size, the pieces, any volume discount, shipping, and the total before sales tax (tax is added at checkout where it applies). Nothing is charged. Use the sizes the customer named; a line is one item in one color with a count per size.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lines | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
revise_design Change a design ~147
Redo an existing design with a change: a different color scheme, fewer details, bolder lines, a different pose, words added or removed. Works from the design, so the result stays recognizably the same piece. Spends one from the allowance like design_item. Returns a new design_id; the old one still exists.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| design_id | string | – | The design_id from that design's earlier result. If that result is no longer in the conversation, leave this out to use the customer's most recent design. |
| instruction | string | yes | What to change, in a sentence. |
| visitor | string | – | The visitor value from an earlier answer, if there was one. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the AI Promo Design MCP server?
AI Promo Design is a hosted endpoint at https://aipromodesign.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · aipromodesign.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-aipromodesign-apparel-designer 'https://aipromodesign.com/api/mcp'
What is the AI Promo Design MCP server?
AI Promo Design is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.aipromodesign/apparel-designer. Design custom t-shirts, hoodies, caps, mugs and totes, price an order, and link to order it. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aipromodesign.com/api/mcp).
Is the AI Promo Design MCP server safe to use?
AI Promo Design scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the AI Promo Design MCP server expose?
AI Promo Design exposes 5 tools: list_items, design_item, revise_design, quote_order, open_in_studio. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 766 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the AI Promo Design MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to AI Promo Design without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the AI Promo Design MCP server still maintained?
AI Promo Design is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the AI Promo Design MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 14 checks on AI Promo Design, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 10 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.