Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Dream On Concierge

REMOTE · DREAMONSAIL.COM

Luxury crewed catamaran charter in the BVI: availability, published-rate quotes and hold requests.

Available components

+3 this week 74 Trust /100

Last scanned (8 hours ago)

Scores higher than 66% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1287 tokens (~183/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
  • Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +7
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “ask_owner” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 166 → 183 ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • New tool “suggest_other_yachts” functional
    • “ask_owner” reworded the description of “kind” cosmetic
    • Tool “ask_owner” changed its title: Ask the owner cosmetic
    • Tool “check_availability” changed its title: Check availability cosmetic
    • Tool “find_open_windows” changed its title: Find open dates cosmetic
    • Tool “get_dream_on_facts” changed its title: Get Dream On facts cosmetic
    • Tool “get_quote” changed its title: Get a price estimate cosmetic
    • Tool “request_hold” changed its title: Request a 48-hour hold cosmetic
  • 14 Oct 26 64

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://dreamonsail.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=dreamonsail.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 28 Aug 2026 26 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 68c85da2b935656ec30ab927e602b1205ba
SANs: *.dreamonsail.com, dreamonsail.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of dreamonsail.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
dreamonsail.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://dreamonsail.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://dreamonsail.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://dreamonsail.com/mcp
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~1,062 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
ask_owner ~206

Pass a question or request to the owner when the fact sheet doesn't cover it (holiday pricing, discounts, contract/payment/cancellation terms, longer or shorter stays, special services, anything else). The guest's email is on file and used automatically.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextstring–Dates, party size and anything else relevant from the conversation
emailstring–Guest's email for the owner's reply (defaults to the email the guest gave at the start)
kindstring–crew_question when the guest wants to ask Captain Rob or Chef Julia something (menus, diets, diving, itinerary ideas) — the owner forwards it to the crew; referral_lead for groups over 8 or 5-cabin/1…
namestring–Guest's name
questionstringyesThe guest's question or request, in full
requesterobject–Optional: who this request is for, so the owner can follow up personally.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_availability ~102

Check whether specific dates are open (48-hour turnaround applied). If not open, returns suggested_open_windows nearby — always offer those to the guest.

NameTypeReqDescription
endstring–Disembarkation date (YYYY-MM-DD)
nightsinteger–Use instead of end
requesterobject–Optional: who this request is for, so the owner can follow up personally.
startstringyesEmbarkation date (YYYY-MM-DD)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_open_windows ~110

List open windows between two dates (e.g. a whole month or season) for charters of at least min_nights. Use when the guest is flexible or asks what's open.

NameTypeReqDescription
fromstringyesSearch from (YYYY-MM-DD)
min_nightsinteger–Minimum nights (5–7 typical)
requesterobject–Optional: who this request is for, so the owner can follow up personally.
tostringyesSearch to (YYYY-MM-DD)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_dream_on_facts ~110

Return Dream On's published fact sheet: the yacht, cabins, toys, amenities, crew, what's included, rates rules, booking process, sample itinerary and FAQ. This is the ONLY source of truth for answers.

NameTypeReqDescription
requesterobject–Optional: who this request is for, so the owner can follow up personally.
sectionstring–Optional section: vessel, crew, inclusions, rates, booking, sample_itinerary, faq, contact. Omit for everything.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_quote ~108

Estimate the all-inclusive charter fee from the published rate rules. If priced=false and refer_to_owner=true, do not invent a price — offer to pass the question to the owner with ask_owner.

NameTypeReqDescription
guestsintegeryesNumber of guests (max 8)
nightsintegeryesNumber of nights
requesterobject–Optional: who this request is for, so the owner can follow up personally.
startstringyesEmbarkation date (YYYY-MM-DD)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

request_hold ~220

Pass a complimentary 48-hour HOLD REQUEST to the owner, who arranges it with Paradise Yacht Clearing (our clearing house). This does NOT confirm anything: Paradise checks the calendar, places the hold and sends the charter contract. Only call after the guest has given their name, email, dates and party size and asked you to request the hold.

NameTypeReqDescription
brokerstring–Name of the broker or travel advisor they work with, if any
emailstring–Guest's email (defaults to the email the guest gave at the start)
endstringyesDisembarkation date (YYYY-MM-DD)
guestsintegeryesNumber of guests
namestringyesGuest's full name
notesstring–Occasion, preferences or questions for Paradise (optional)
phonestring–Guest's phone (optional)
requesterobject–Optional: who this request is for, so the owner can follow up personally.
startstringyesEmbarkation date (YYYY-MM-DD)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

suggest_other_yachts ~206

Only after Dream On's own options don't work — the group is larger than 8, or none of Dream On's open dates suit the guest — return a link to Islands & Sails, Dream On's sister concierge (run by Dream On's owner), pre-filled with the guest's dates and party size, where they can explore other hand-picked BVI crewed yachts.

NameTypeReqDescription
guestsinteger–Party size, if known
nightsinteger–Number of nights, if known
notestring–Short note on what they want (occasion, style), optional
requesterobject–Optional: who this request is for, so the owner can follow up personally.
startstring–Preferred start date — always include it when the guest has named dates or a period (e.g. 'the last week of May 2027' → 2027-05-22 with nights 7) (YYYY-MM-DD)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Dream On Concierge MCP server?

Dream On Concierge is a hosted endpoint at https://dreamonsail.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · dreamonsail.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-dreamonsail-concierge 'https://dreamonsail.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Dream On Concierge MCP server?

Dream On Concierge is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.dreamonsail/concierge. Luxury crewed catamaran charter in the BVI: availability, published-rate quotes and hold requests. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://dreamonsail.com/mcp).

Is the Dream On Concierge MCP server safe to use?

Dream On Concierge scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Dream On Concierge MCP server expose?

Dream On Concierge exposes 7 tools: get_dream_on_facts, check_availability, find_open_windows, get_quote, request_hold, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,062 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Dream On Concierge MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Dream On Concierge without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Dream On Concierge MCP server still maintained?

Dream On Concierge is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.