Sitewalk
REMOTE · AUDIT.ADITYAARSHARMA.COM
Technical SEO audits from ChatGPT or the web: health score, prioritised fixes, CSV and PDF reports.
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 55% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1540 tokens (~513/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
- Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “start_site_audit” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 455 → 513 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 3 Nov 26 69
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=audit.adityaarsharma.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 6 Oct 2026 | 4 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 6ac8c2902e555f84d2b1d176e1c5f33ba8f |
| SANs: audit.adityaarsharma.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of audit.adityaarsharma.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| adityaarsharma.com. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| audit.adityaarsharma.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_audit_report Get audit report ~132
Use this once get_audit_status shows completed. Takes the audit_id and an optional top_n (1 to 25, default 10). Returns the issues ranked by likely impact, each with the number of affected pages, example URLs and a plain-English fix, plus a list of what was checked, what was not checked, and a note when the page limit was reached, and the full_report_url, pdf_url and csv_url links. Report the issues as given; do not add findings that are not in the result.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| audit_id | string | yes | – |
| top_n | integer | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_audit_status Check audit status ~172
Use this after start_site_audit to check whether the audit has finished. Takes the audit_id. Returns status (queued, running, completed, failed or canceled), pages crawled so far, the page limit, and any notes or error text. If the status is failed, the error field says why (for example the site blocked the crawler or robots.txt disallows it). Also returns phase, a plain-English message with the stage, pages crawled and time left, progress_pct, stalled and next_check_after_s. After each call, show the user the message, then call again after next_check_after_s seconds (20 to 30) until the status is completed, failed or canceled. When completed it also returns report_url, pdf_url and csv_url.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| audit_id | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
start_site_audit Start site audit ~266
Use this when the user asks for a technical SEO audit, a site crawl or an SEO health check of a website, or for broken links, redirect chains, duplicate or missing titles and meta descriptions, canonical, noindex or hreflang problems, sitemap errors, pages that are hard to find from the home page, or whether robots.txt or meta robots tags keep search engines out of pages. Takes a site address (a domain such as example.com or a full URL; the scheme is optional) and starts a crawl of that site, then returns an audit_id, the page limit and a time estimate to relay to the user. The crawl follows robots.txt, is rate limited, and takes a few minutes for a small site and longer for a large one. The number of pages crawled is capped; the report says when the cap was reached. If the address redirects (http to https, or to www), the final site is audited. Only use it for sites the user owns or is allowed to audit. Do not use it for backlinks, keyword rankings, Google Search Console or analytics data, page speed scores, or writing content: Sitewalk does not measure those. To read a finished audit, use get_audit_report instead.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Sitewalk MCP server?
Sitewalk is a hosted endpoint at https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · audit.adityaarsharma.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-adityaarsharma-audit-sitewalk 'https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp'
What is the Sitewalk MCP server?
Sitewalk is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.adityaarsharma.audit/sitewalk. Technical SEO audits from ChatGPT or the web: health score, prioritised fixes, CSV and PDF reports. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp).
Is the Sitewalk MCP server safe to use?
Sitewalk scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Sitewalk MCP server expose?
Sitewalk exposes 3 tools: start_site_audit, get_audit_status, get_audit_report. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 570 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Sitewalk MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Sitewalk without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Sitewalk MCP server still maintained?
Sitewalk is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.