Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Quién Patrocina

REMOTE · QUIENPATROCINA.COM

Which brands sponsor Spanish-language podcasts and YouTube channels in Spain and Latin America.

+4 this week 71 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 57% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1192 tokens (~170/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
  • Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage91
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 69% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 −1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “find_sponsor_leads_for_podcast” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_brand_podcast_sponsorships” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_podcast_sponsors” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “list_top_podcast_sponsors” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search_podcast_sponsorships” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 123 → 170 ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 64% → 69% ▲ functional
    • Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
    • New tool “check_brand_on_show” functional
    • New tool “list_sponsors_by_category” functional
    • “list_top_podcast_sponsors” reworded the description of “country” cosmetic
    • “search_podcast_sponsorships” reworded the description of “country” cosmetic
    • Tool “find_sponsor_leads_for_podcast” changed its title: Marcas para proponer a un podcast → Marcas para proponer a un podcast / Sponsor leads for a podcast cosmetic
    • Tool “get_brand_podcast_sponsorships” changed its title: Patrocinios de una marca → Patrocinios de una marca / Where a brand advertises cosmetic
    • Tool “get_podcast_sponsors” changed its title: Patrocinadores de un podcast → Patrocinadores de un podcast / Who sponsors a podcast cosmetic
    • Tool “list_top_podcast_sponsors” changed its title: Marcas que más patrocinan → Marcas que más patrocinan / Top podcast sponsors cosmetic
    • Tool “search_podcast_sponsorships” changed its title: Buscar patrocinios en podcasts → Buscar patrocinios en podcasts / Search podcast sponsorships cosmetic
  • 23 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://quienpatrocina.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=quienpatrocina.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 21 Oct 2026 19 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 271633287405c9b80ed0c58ce22376c2
SANs: quienpatrocina.com, www.quienpatrocina.com, *.www.quienpatrocina.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of quienpatrocina.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
quienpatrocina.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://quienpatrocina.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://quienpatrocina.com/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~1,027 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_brand_on_show ~179

Check whether a given brand has a written sponsorship mention on a given Spanish-language podcast or YouTube channel in the last 30 days. Comprueba si una marca tiene mención de patrocinio escrita en un programa. Returns status (mention_found, no_mention_found, brand_unknown, show_unknown), the matching episodes with date, promo code and link, and how many other shows the brand sponsors. no_mention_found does not prove an ad did not air: read-aloud ads that are not written in the description are not visible. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyesBrand name, e.g. 'Hostinger'
showstringyesPodcast or channel name, e.g. 'Spicy4tuna'
NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyes–
brand_candidatesarrayyes–
brand_other_showsnumberyes–
brand_pagestring|nullyes–
first_datestring|nullyes–
last_datestring|nullyes–
mention_countnumberyes–
mentionsarrayyes–
next_stepobjectyes–
showstringyes–
show_candidatesarrayyes–
show_has_other_sponsorsnumber––
show_pagestring|nullyes–
statusstringyes–

No examples provided.

find_sponsor_leads_for_podcast ~129

Which brands could a podcaster, network or agency pitch for sponsorship? ¿A qué marcas proponer un patrocinio? Takes a Spanish-language show and returns brands that sponsored similar shows in the last 30 days but did not sponsor this show. Similar means same category and country; if that finds nothing it widens to same category, then same country, and says which in basis. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
showstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
basis–yes–
candidatesarrayyes–
foundbooleanyes–
leadsarrayyes–
next_stepobjectyes–
showstringyes–
similar_showsnumberyes–

No examples provided.

get_brand_podcast_sponsorships ~113

Where does a brand advertise in Spanish-language podcasts and YouTube channels? ¿En qué podcasts se anuncia una marca? Returns every show the brand sponsored in the last 30 days with episode counts, last date, promo codes and offers. If the name is ambiguous it returns candidate brand names instead. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyesBrand name, e.g. 'Trade Republic'
NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyes–
brand_pagestring|nullyes–
candidatesarrayyes–
foundbooleanyes–
next_stepobjectyes–
showsarrayyes–
total_episodesnumberyes–

No examples provided.

get_podcast_sponsors ~115

Who sponsors a given Spanish-language podcast or YouTube channel, and which promo codes does it read? ¿Quién patrocina este podcast? Returns each sponsoring brand in the last 30 days with episode counts, last date, codes and offers. If the name is ambiguous it returns candidate show names instead. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.

NameTypeReqDescription
showstringyesPodcast or channel name, e.g. 'Tengo un Plan'
NameTypeReqDescription
candidatesarrayyes–
countrystringyes–
foundbooleanyes–
next_stepobjectyes–
showstringyes–
show_pagestring|nullyes–
sponsorsarrayyes–

No examples provided.

list_sponsors_by_category ~175

Which brands advertise in a podcast category (finance, technology, sports, news, comedy, education...), optionally within one country? ¿Qué marcas se anuncian en podcasts de una categoría? Category names follow Apple Podcasts in Spanish; accents optional. Returns brands ranked by number of shows sponsored in that category over the last 30 days, with example shows and codes. If the category is not recognised it returns available_categories. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyesCategory, e.g. 'Negocios y finanzas', 'Tecnología', 'Deportes'
countrystring–Country of the show; accents optional / País del programa; tildes opcionales
limitinteger––
NameTypeReqDescription
available_categoriesarrayyes–
candidatesarrayyes–
categorystringyes–
category_pagestring|nullyes–
foundbooleanyes–
next_stepobjectyes–
sponsorsarrayyes–
total_placementsnumberyes–

No examples provided.

list_top_podcast_sponsors ~110

Which brands sponsor the most Spanish-language podcasts and YouTube channels, overall or in one country? ¿Qué marcas patrocinan más podcasts? Returns brands ranked by number of different shows sponsored in the last 30 days. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.

NameTypeReqDescription
countrystring–Country of the show; accents optional / País del programa; tildes opcionales
limitinteger––
NameTypeReqDescription
countrystringyes–
next_stepobjectyes–
period_endstringyes–
period_startstringyes–
sponsorsarrayyes–

No examples provided.

search_podcast_sponsorships ~206

Search which brands sponsor Spanish-language podcasts or YouTube channels, filtered by brand, show, country or only ads with a promo code. Busca qué marcas patrocinan podcasts y canales en español, por marca, programa, país o con código de descuento. Returns placements from the last 30 days: brand, show, country, episode date, promo code, offer and links. Not for shows outside Spain and Latin America. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstring–Brand name, partial is fine, e.g. 'Hostinger'
countrystring–Country of the show; accents optional / País del programa; tildes opcionales
limitinteger––
showstring–Podcast or YouTube channel name, partial is fine
with_promo_codeboolean–Only placements that include a promo code
NameTypeReqDescription
next_stepobjectyes–
period_endstringyes–
period_startstringyes–
resultsarrayyes–
total_matchesnumberyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Quién Patrocina MCP server?

Quién Patrocina is a hosted endpoint at https://quienpatrocina.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · quienpatrocina.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-quienpatrocina-quien-patrocina 'https://quienpatrocina.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Quién Patrocina MCP server?

Quién Patrocina is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.quienpatrocina/quien-patrocina. Which brands sponsor Spanish-language podcasts and YouTube channels in Spain and Latin America. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://quienpatrocina.com/mcp).

Is the Quién Patrocina MCP server safe to use?

Quién Patrocina scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Quién Patrocina MCP server expose?

Quién Patrocina exposes 7 tools: search_podcast_sponsorships, get_brand_podcast_sponsorships, get_podcast_sponsors, list_top_podcast_sponsors, list_sponsors_by_category, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,027 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Quién Patrocina MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Quién Patrocina without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Quién Patrocina MCP server still maintained?

Quién Patrocina is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.