Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Submit.co

REMOTE · SUBMIT.CO

Where to launch a startup: researched directories, launch platforms, newsletters and press.

Available components

73 Trust /100

Last scanned (10 hours ago)

Scores higher than 60% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability59
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 866 tokens (~433/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
  • Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 30 Oct 26 71

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://submit.co/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=submit.co CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 30 Sept 2026 29 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 98c87e414bb96455135cbc63d5f8d6df
SANs: submit.co, *.submit.co
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of submit.co. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
co. present 7786 8 Verified
submit.co. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://submit.co/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://submit.co/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://submit.co/mcp
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~315 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_site ~66

Look up one site on Submit.co by its domain: what it costs, the link a product gets, who gets in, how much exposure it gets, and where to submit.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyesThe site's domain, e.g. betalist.com. A URL works too

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_sites ~249

List launch platforms, directories, communities, newsletters, press and review sites that take product submissions, highest Ahrefs Domain Rating first. Every filter is optional; combine them to narrow the list.

NameTypeReqDescription
acceptancestring–everyone: every product that fits. reviewed: most get in. selective: only a few are picked
backlinkstring–The link the product gets: dofollow helps SEO
exposurestring–featured_to_audience: shown on their homepage, newsletter or social. depends_on_votes: visibility depends on upvotes. listing_only: a listing page, little promotion
limitinteger–Sites per page (default 25)
nichestring–Products the site is for. general sites take any product
offsetinteger–Sites to skip, from next_offset of the previous page
pricestring–free: free to list, including sites with paid options. free_without_backlink: free without having to link back to them. paid: paid only
qstring–Part of the site's name or domain, e.g. hunt or betalist
typestring–Kind of site

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Submit.co MCP server?

Submit.co is a hosted endpoint at https://submit.co/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · submit.co

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http co-submit-submit 'https://submit.co/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Submit.co MCP server?

Submit.co is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as co.submit/submit. Where to launch a startup: researched directories, launch platforms, newsletters and press. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://submit.co/mcp).

Is the Submit.co MCP server safe to use?

Submit.co scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Submit.co MCP server expose?

Submit.co exposes 2 tools: search_sites, get_site. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 315 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Submit.co MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Submit.co without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Submit.co MCP server still maintained?

Submit.co is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.