AEO Lookup
REMOTE · AEOLOOKUP.COM
Free AI crawler, schema, llms.txt and answer-readiness checks for public web pages. No API key.
Available components
Last scanned (7 hours ago)
Scores higher than 61% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2100 tokens (~190/item across 11 items; 11 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 11 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 153 → 190 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Schema quality: good → excellent functional
- New tool “calculate_ai_savings” functional
- New tool “calculate_ai_time_saved” functional
- New tool “check_job_ai_risk” functional
- New tool “estimate_ai_staff_impact” functional
- New tool “score_ai_readiness” functional
- 30 Oct 26 71
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://aeolookup.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=aeolookup.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 30 Oct 2026 | 28 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 555dee0b60ef2255c26194409dffbd445c1 |
| SANs: aeolookup.com, www.aeolookup.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of aeolookup.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| aeolookup.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://aeolookup.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://aeolookup.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://aeolookup.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
calculate_ai_savings AI savings calculator ~173
Estimates how much a UK business could save a year by handing admin to AI: a range in pounds from team size, weekly admin hours per person, hourly pay (default the ONS 2025 UK median) and sector exposure (Department for Education ranking), with two or three insights. Partial by design: the free AI audit gives the full breakdown. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/ai-calculators/ai-savings-calculator/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| admin_hours | number | – | Hours of admin each person does a week (default 10). |
| hourly_pay | number | – | Average hourly pay in pounds (default 19.67, the UK median). |
| industry | string | – | The business sector (default other). |
| staff | integer | yes | Number of staff. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
calculate_ai_time_saved AI time-saved calculator ~293
Estimates the hours a week AI could save one person or a team, from the hours spent on seven everyday task types (email, scheduling, quotes and invoices, data entry, customer questions, documents, marketing), using a share per task informed by IPPR and McKinsey research. Returns a range and the task with the biggest saving. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/ai-calculators/ai-time-saved-calculator/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| customers | number | – | Hours a week one person spends on answering customer questions (phone, chat, email) (default 0). |
| data | number | – | Hours a week one person spends on data entry, admin and updating records (default 0). |
| documents | number | – | Hours a week one person spends on reports, proposals and documents (default 0). |
| number | – | Hours a week one person spends on email and messages (default 0). | |
| marketing | number | – | Hours a week one person spends on social posts, newsletters and marketing copy (default 0). |
| people | integer | – | How many people spend their week like this (default 1). |
| quotes | number | – | Hours a week one person spends on quotes, invoices and chasing payments (default 0). |
| scheduling | number | – | Hours a week one person spends on scheduling, bookings and reminders (default 0). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_ai_crawler_access AI crawler checker ~176
Checks whether the crawlers behind ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot and 14 more may read a page: robots.txt rules (RFC 9309), robots meta and X-Robots-Tag directives, and whether the site's firewall refuses each crawler's user agent. Separates search and user crawlers (which decide whether you can be cited) from training crawlers (which do not). Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/aeo-tools/ai-crawler-checker/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | – | Optional path to test instead of the URL's own path, for example /blog/. |
| url | string | yes | The page or site to check, for example https://example.co.uk/ (https:// is added if missing). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_job_ai_risk Is my job at risk from AI? ~89
Rates a UK occupation's exposure to AI (high, medium or low, following the Department for Education's 2023 ranking), the share of its tasks AI can do today and the tasks it reaches first. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/ai-calculators/is-my-job-at-risk-from-ai/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job | string | yes | The occupation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_structured_data Schema checker ~131
Extracts every JSON-LD block on a page, lists the schema.org types it describes, flags missing required and recommended properties (Organization, LocalBusiness, Article, FAQPage, Product, Service, Person, BreadcrumbList, Event) and scores entity signals: a named organisation, sameAs links to other profiles, a logo and an @id. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/aeo-tools/schema-checker/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | The page or site to check, for example https://example.co.uk/ (https:// is added if missing). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
estimate_ai_staff_impact Will AI replace my staff? ~248
Estimates how much of a team's work AI could take on today, as full-time roles' worth of tasks, from headcount in seven role groups, ordered by the Department for Education's exposure ranking. Measures tasks, not people. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/ai-calculators/will-ai-replace-my-staff/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| admin | integer | – | How many people work as admin, reception and office support (default 0). |
| customer | integer | – | How many people work as customer service and phone sales (default 0). |
| finance | integer | – | How many people work as bookkeeping, payroll and finance admin (default 0). |
| handson | integer | – | How many people work as hands-on staff (trades, care, kitchen, warehouse, drivers) (default 0). |
| managers | integer | – | How many people work as managers and directors (default 0). |
| marketing | integer | – | How many people work as marketing and content (default 0). |
| professional | integer | – | How many people work as professionals (accountants, solicitors, consultants, analysts) (default 0). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_llms_txt llms.txt generator ~138
Drafts an llms.txt for a site: the name and summary from its home page, then its pages from the sitemap grouped by section, with titles and descriptions read from up to 24 pages. Returns the file as text, for a person to edit before publishing. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/aeo-tools/llms-txt-validator/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_links | integer | – | Roughly how many links to include (default 40). |
| url | string | yes | The page or site to check, for example https://example.co.uk/ (https:// is added if missing). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_aeo_audit Full AEO audit ~123
Runs all four checks on one address (AI crawler access, structured data, llms.txt, answer readiness) and returns each result plus an overall score: the mean of the crawler, schema and answer-readiness scores. llms.txt is reported but not scored, because the evidence says few systems read it. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/aeo-tools/api/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | The page or site to check, for example https://example.co.uk/ (https:// is added if missing). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
score_ai_readiness AI readiness score ~305
Scores how ready a small business is to put AI tools to work, out of 100, from eight yes or no questions (digital records, one customer system, written processes, known repetitive tasks, current AI use, an owner, a clear website, time to bed in), and names the two biggest gaps. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/ai-calculators/ai-readiness-score/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| digital | boolean | – | Most of your business records are in software, not on paper or in heads (15 points). |
| onePlace | boolean | – | Customer details live in one system (a CRM, booking or accounts tool), not scattered across inboxes (15 points). |
| owner | boolean | – | One person is responsible for trying AI in the business (10 points). |
| processes | boolean | – | Your routine jobs (quoting, booking, onboarding, invoicing) follow written steps (15 points). |
| repetitive | boolean | – | You can name the three most repetitive tasks in your week (10 points). |
| time | boolean | – | You could give a new tool two or three hours a week for a month to bed in (15 points). |
| using | boolean | – | Someone on the team already uses an AI assistant such as ChatGPT or Copilot every week (10 points). |
| website | boolean | – | Your website answers customers' common questions clearly, so AI assistants can find and quote you (10 points). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
score_answer_readiness Answer-readiness checker ~144
Scores a page out of 100 on 14 published checks: indexable, title and description, one H1, question headings, direct first-sentence answers, structured data, dates, a named author, lists and tables, source links, specific figures, length, declared language and stock AI phrasing. Returns each check's points, what it found and the fix, ordered by points available. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/aeo-tools/answer-readiness-checker/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | The page or site to check, for example https://example.co.uk/ (https:// is added if missing). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_llms_txt llms.txt validator ~161
Fetches /llms.txt (or the llms.txt address given), validates it against the llmstxt.org proposal (one H1, optional summary, H2 sections of [name](url): notes links), tests up to eight of its links and reports whether llms-full.txt exists. States the evidence on how little the file is read. Free, no key. Docs: https://aeolookup.com/aeo-tools/llms-txt-validator/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| check_links | boolean | – | Test up to eight of the file's links that are on its own site (default true). |
| url | string | yes | The page or site to check, for example https://example.co.uk/ (https:// is added if missing). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the AEO Lookup MCP server?
AEO Lookup is a hosted endpoint at https://aeolookup.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · aeolookup.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-aeolookup-free-aeo-tools 'https://aeolookup.com/mcp'
What is the AEO Lookup MCP server?
AEO Lookup is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.aeolookup/free-aeo-tools. Free AI crawler, schema, llms.txt and answer-readiness checks for public web pages. No API key. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aeolookup.com/mcp).
Is the AEO Lookup MCP server safe to use?
AEO Lookup scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the AEO Lookup MCP server expose?
AEO Lookup exposes 11 tools: check_ai_crawler_access, check_structured_data, validate_llms_txt, generate_llms_txt, score_answer_readiness, and 6 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,981 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the AEO Lookup MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to AEO Lookup without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the AEO Lookup MCP server still maintained?
AEO Lookup is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the AEO Lookup MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on AEO Lookup, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.