Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Anymark

REMOTE · ANYMARK.CO

Create logos from templates made by humans (no AI slop)

Available components

+3 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 76% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 291 tokens (~97/item across 3 items; 2 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
  • Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 26 Oct 26 74

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://anymark.co/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=anymark.co CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 23 Sept 2026 22 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6cda4b9f013f07fb909eac8543328d0aa50
SANs: anymark.co
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of anymark.co. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
co. present 7786 8 Verified
anymark.co. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://anymark.co/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://anymark.co/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://anymark.co:443/mcp
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~279 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_logo_name ~107

Checks how a business name will read on a logo and suggests a shorter logo version when the name has a legal ending (Inc, LLC), a web address, a generic company word (Group, Solutions) or a word for what the business sells. The rules come from a study of about 1,000 well-designed brand logos.

NameTypeReqDescription
business_typestring–tech for software and tech products, other for everything else
namestringyesThe business name as typed

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

create_logo_previews ~172

Shows 6 logo previews for a business, made from Anymark's designer templates with the business name set in each: icon logos picked for the business description, and letter logos built on the name's first letter, each with why it fits. Each preview links to the Anymark editor, where the logo can be customized. Previews are not licensed for use until the logo is bought on Anymark. `page` (1-5) shows further previews for the same business.

NameTypeReqDescription
business_namestringyesThe name exactly as it should appear on the logo
descriptionstringyesWhat the business does, in a sentence or two
pageinteger–Which page of previews, 1 by default
stylestring–Optional look to favor

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Anymark MCP server?

Anymark is a hosted endpoint at https://anymark.co/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · anymark.co

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http co-anymark-anymark 'https://anymark.co/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Anymark MCP server?

Anymark is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as co.anymark/anymark. Create logos from templates made by humans (no AI slop). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://anymark.co/mcp).

Is the Anymark MCP server safe to use?

Anymark scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Anymark MCP server expose?

Anymark exposes 2 tools: create_logo_previews, check_logo_name. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 279 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Anymark MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Anymark without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Anymark MCP server still maintained?

Anymark is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.