io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api
NPM · CINDERWRIGHT-MCP-SERVER · SCANNED SEP 21
Cross-protocol agent payments hub. x402, MPP, L402/Lightning. 1551 services indexed.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 31 of 95 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 104 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 625 tokens (~52/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api MCP server?
io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y cinderwright-mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · cinderwright-mcp-server
claude mcp add cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api -- npx -y cinderwright-mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"cinderwright-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"cinderwright-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api -- npx -y cinderwright-mcp-server
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"cinderwright-mcp-server"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api --command npx --arg -y --arg cinderwright-mcp-server
mcp_servers:
cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "cinderwright-mcp-server"] {
"McpServers": {
"cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"cinderwright-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api -t stdio -c npx -a -y cinderwright-mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"cinderwright-ai-cinderwright-api": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"cinderwright-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 15 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/cinderwright-mcp-server@1.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 95 packages
| Packages resolved | 95 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
agent_check ~77
Check if an agent wallet is registered and authorized for a specific service category. Free - service providers use this before accepting payment.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | number | – | Transaction amount to check against spending limits (optional) |
| category | string | – | Service category to check authorization for (optional) |
| wallet | string | yes | Agent wallet address (0x...) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare ~80
Compare agent payment services side by side with quality grades, prices, and a recommendation. Costs $0.02 USDC on Base via x402. UNIQUE - no other hub offers this.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | yes | Service capability to compare (e.g. weather, translate, llm) |
| sort_by | string | – | Sort order (default: quality) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
discover ~71
Search for agent payment services by keyword across x402, MPP, and Lightning protocols. Costs $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| protocol | string | – | Filter by protocol (optional) |
| query | string | yes | Search keyword (e.g. weather, translate, price, llm) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find ~75
Intent-based discovery. Describe what you need in plain English and get the best service recommendation. Costs $0.02 USDC on Base via x402. UNIQUE - no other hub offers this.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| intent | string | yes | Describe what you need (e.g. "I need a cheap weather API for Tokyo under $0.02") |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
market_opportunity ~37
Gap analysis. Underserved niches with few providers and overpriced categories you could undercut. Costs $0.50 USDC on Base.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
market_report ~44
Full market intelligence report. Which categories earn the most? Where are pricing gaps? Built from 1,551+ indexed services. Costs $1.00 USDC on Base.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
prices ~29
Get market pricing intelligence. Average, median, min, and max prices across the ecosystem with category breakdowns.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
protocols ~46
Get cross-protocol breakdown: x402 (Coinbase/USDC) vs MPP (Stripe/Tempo) vs L402 (Bitcoin Lightning). Shows service count and description for each protocol.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
quality ~39
Get service quality grades. Cinderwright tests 70 services weekly and grades them A-F on reachability, JSON validity, discovery files, and payment compliance.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stats ~31
Get ecosystem statistics for the agent payments economy. Returns total services indexed across x402, MPP, and Lightning protocols.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
submit ~76
Submit your x402, MPP, or Lightning service for free indexing in the Cinderwright Discovery Hub. Crawled and health-checked daily.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | string | – | What your service does |
| name | string | – | Service name |
| url | string | yes | Your service URL (e.g. https://your-api.com) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trends ~20
Get what agents and developers are searching for in the discovery hub.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api MCP server?
io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api. Cross-protocol agent payments hub. x402, MPP, L402/Lightning. 1551 services indexed. This page covers its npm package (cinderwright-mcp-server).
Is the io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api MCP server safe to use?
io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 21 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api MCP server expose?
io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api exposes 12 tools: stats, protocols, quality, prices, trends, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 625 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api MCP server still maintained?
io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api MCP server under?
io.github.cinderwright-ai/cinderwright-api declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.