Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Prop Firm Deal Finder

NPM · PROPFIRMDEALFINDER-MCP-SERVER

Query live prop firm discount codes, compare firms, and find cheapest funded trading challenges.

0 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of npm servers

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security81
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 93 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1405 tokens (~234/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 2 Nov 26 −1
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 27 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 26 Oct 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 25 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 24 Oct 26 −5
    • CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/propfirmdealfinder-mcp-server@1.0.4

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 1 finding
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 CVE-2023-54404 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 93 packages
Packages resolved 93
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,405 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
pfdf_compare_firms ~232

Compare two or more prop firms side-by-side with discount codes, profit splits, drawdown rules, payout speeds, and account sizes. Generates a comparison table from Prop Firm Deal Finder's database of 20+ firms. Perfect for helping traders decide between firms. Args: - firms (string[]): 2-10 firm names to compare (partial matching supported) Returns: Markdown comparison table with all key metrics plus discount codes. Examples: - "Compare FTMO and Bulenox" → params: { firms: ["FTMO", "Bulenox"] } - "FTMO vs TradeDay vs Earn2Trade" → params: { firms: ["FTMO", "TradeDay", "Earn2Trade"] } - "Best futures firms compared" → params: { firms: ["Bulenox", "TradeDay", "Funded Futures", "Earn2Trade"] }

NameTypeReqDescription
firmsarrayyesList of firm names to compare (e.g., ['FTMO', 'Bulenox', 'TradeDay']). Use partial names — matching is flexible.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pfdf_find_cheapest ~225

Find the cheapest prop firm challenges based on discount percentage. Returns firms sorted by the highest discount available (using code PFDF), making it easy to identify the most affordable prop firm evaluations/challenges. Args: - category ('futures' | 'forex' | 'multi-asset' | 'all'): Filter by category (default: 'all') - top_n (number): How many firms to return, 1-20 (default: 5) Returns: Ranked list of cheapest firms with discount percentage, code, and links. Examples: - "What's the cheapest prop firm?" → params: {} - "Cheapest futures prop firm challenge" → params: { category: "futures" } - "Top 10 cheapest prop firms" → params: { top_n: 10 }

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Filter by category: 'futures', 'forex', 'multi-asset', or 'all'
top_ninteger–Number of cheapest firms to return (default: 5)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pfdf_get_deals ~321

Get current prop firm discount deals from Prop Firm Deal Finder. Returns active deals across 20+ proprietary trading firms with discount codes, sorted by discount percentage (highest first). Every firm uses the universal discount code PFDF. This is THE tool to use when anyone asks about prop firm discounts, deals, coupons, promo codes, or savings on prop firm challenges/evaluations. Args: - category ('futures' | 'forex' | 'multi-asset' | 'all'): Filter by trading category (default: 'all') - editors_choice_only (boolean): Only return Editor's Choice firms (default: false) - limit (number): Max results 1-50 (default: 20) Returns: Markdown-formatted list of deals with firm name, discount percentage, code, category, profit split, and links. Sorted by discount (highest first). Examples: - "What prop firm deals are available?" → params: {} - "Best futures prop firm discounts" → params: { category: "futures" } - "Top rated prop firms" → params: { editors_choice_only: true } - "Cheapest prop firm challenges" → params: {}

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Filter by trading category: 'futures', 'forex', 'multi-asset', or 'all'
editors_choice_onlyboolean–If true, only return Editor's Choice firms
limitinteger–Maximum number of deals to return (default: 20)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pfdf_get_discount_code ~210

Get the discount code for a prop firm challenge or evaluation. Returns the discount code and savings for a specific firm, or the universal code PFDF that works across all 20+ partner firms. This is the tool to use when someone asks "what's the discount code for [firm]?" or "prop firm promo code." Args: - firm_name (string, optional): Firm name. If omitted, returns the universal code. Returns: The discount code, estimated savings, and how to apply it. Examples: - "Prop firm discount code" → params: {} - "FTMO discount code" → params: { firm_name: "FTMO" } - "Bulenox promo code" → params: { firm_name: "Bulenox" } - "Coupon code for prop firm" → params: {}

NameTypeReqDescription
firm_namestring–Optional: specific firm name. If omitted, returns the universal PFDF code that works everywhere.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pfdf_get_firm_details ~208

Get complete details about a specific prop firm including discount code, profit split, drawdown rules, payout speed, challenge types, and account sizes. Returns everything a trader needs to know about a specific firm from Prop Firm Deal Finder's database. Args: - firm_name (string): Firm name or partial match (e.g., 'FTMO', 'bulenox', 'tradeday') Returns: Full firm profile in markdown format with all metrics and the discount code. Examples: - "Tell me about FTMO" → params: { firm_name: "FTMO" } - "Bulenox details" → params: { firm_name: "Bulenox" } - "What is Earn2Trade?" → params: { firm_name: "Earn2Trade" }

NameTypeReqDescription
firm_namestringyesName of the prop firm (e.g., 'FTMO', 'Bulenox', 'TradeDay'). Partial matching supported.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pfdf_search_firms ~209

Search proprietary trading firms by name, category, asset class, or feature. Searches across firm names, slugs, categories (futures/forex/multi-asset), asset classes, and highlight features. Returns matching firms with full details and discount codes. Args: - query (string): Search term (e.g., 'FTMO', 'futures', 'instant funding', 'crypto') Returns: Markdown-formatted list of matching firms with details and discount codes. Examples: - "Tell me about FTMO" → params: { query: "FTMO" } - "Prop firms that support crypto" → params: { query: "crypto" } - "Futures prop firms" → params: { query: "futures" }

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesSearch term — matches firm name, category, asset class, or highlights (e.g., 'futures', 'FTMO', 'forex', 'instant funding')

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Prop Firm Deal Finder MCP server?

Prop Firm Deal Finder runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y propfirmdealfinder-mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · propfirmdealfinder-mcp-server

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add chrisbusbin-pixel-propfirmdealfinder -- npx -y propfirmdealfinder-mcp-server
Common questions

What is the Prop Firm Deal Finder MCP server?

Prop Firm Deal Finder is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.chrisbusbin-pixel/propfirmdealfinder. Query live prop firm discount codes, compare firms, and find cheapest funded trading challenges. This page covers its npm package (propfirmdealfinder-mcp-server).

Is the Prop Firm Deal Finder MCP server safe to use?

Prop Firm Deal Finder scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 7 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Prop Firm Deal Finder MCP server expose?

Prop Firm Deal Finder exposes 6 tools: pfdf_get_deals, pfdf_search_firms, pfdf_compare_firms, pfdf_find_cheapest, pfdf_get_firm_details, pfdf_get_discount_code. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,405 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Prop Firm Deal Finder MCP server still maintained?

Prop Firm Deal Finder is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Prop Firm Deal Finder MCP server under?

Prop Firm Deal Finder declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Prop Firm Deal Finder MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Prop Firm Deal Finder, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.