Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

PrintSanity

REMOTE · PRINTSANITY.COM

Checks AI-made flyers, cards and posters will print right. Fixes proportions and broken QR codes.

Available components

+3 this week 70 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 60% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 721 tokens (~180/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (25% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.10 ▲ functional
  • 7 Oct 26 63

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://printsanity.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=printsanity.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 18 Sept 2026 17 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 90c4cfdb48b5cc6e131a4de351449a3b
SANs: printsanity.com, www.printsanity.com, *.www.printsanity.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of printsanity.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
printsanity.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://printsanity.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://printsanity.com/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~413 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_print_file ~101

Check whether artwork will print correctly at the given size. Give the artwork as file_url (public https link) or file_base64. `size` is required for images. Returns the verdict, what is wrong, whether repair reaches a printable file, and the prompt to regenerate with when it cannot.

NameTypeReqDescription
expect_qr–––
file_base64–––
file_url–––
filename–––
size–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

fix_print_file ~214

Repair what can be repaired and return download links for the print-ready file. Rebuilds QR codes so they scan, fixes proportions by adding paper rather than cropping, and returns a PDF the size of the paper (inside a border a home printer can reach, where the paper is one a home printer takes) plus a PNG and, where it differs, an edge-to-edge PDF for print shops. For small pieces such as business cards and invitations it also returns letter and A4 sheets with several copies and cut marks. Links last 30 minutes. Resolution is never faked: when that is the problem the result carries the prompt to regenerate with. `qr_url` is the link a QR code should carry when the one on the artwork was drawn by an image model and decodes to nothing.

NameTypeReqDescription
enlarge_qrboolean––
file_base64–––
file_url–––
filename–––
qr_url–––
size–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_print_sizes ~22

The named print sizes `size` accepts, with their dimensions.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes–

No examples provided.

plan_artwork ~76

What to ask an image model for, before generating artwork for this print size. Returns the pixel dimensions to generate at, the floor below which it will look soft, the proportions, the smallest QR code that scans from where this piece is read, and a line to paste into the image prompt.

NameTypeReqDescription
sizestringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the PrintSanity MCP server?

PrintSanity is a hosted endpoint at https://printsanity.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · printsanity.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http chartsmartdev-printsanity 'https://printsanity.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the PrintSanity MCP server?

PrintSanity is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.chartsmartdev/printsanity. Checks AI-made flyers, cards and posters will print right. Fixes proportions and broken QR codes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://printsanity.com/mcp).

Is the PrintSanity MCP server safe to use?

PrintSanity scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the PrintSanity MCP server expose?

PrintSanity exposes 4 tools: list_print_sizes, plan_artwork, check_print_file, fix_print_file. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 413 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the PrintSanity MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to PrintSanity without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the PrintSanity MCP server still maintained?

PrintSanity is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.