ChatSpatial
PYPI · CHATSPATIAL
Schema-enforced spatial transcriptomics analysis with 20 tools and 67 methods via MCP
Available components
Last scanned (19 hours ago)
Scores higher than 0% of PyPI servers
Category Health and Science
Recent critical change
CVE-2026-96639 affects this package (31 Oct 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security24
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- Dependency health was assessed across the 172 of 173 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to cafferychen777/ChatSpatial). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 14 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema for these checks to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until we can run it. How we score packages →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 2 Nov 26 0
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 1 Nov 26 0
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 31 Oct 26 −30
- CVE-2026-96639 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- CVE-2026-112393 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- CVE-2026-112403 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- CVE-2026-112398 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- CVE-2026-112900 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- Score status: scored → failed ▼ critical
- Known CVEs: CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. critical
- CVE-2026-69247 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-69248 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-69249 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 30 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Supply Chain Security went from 80 to 82.
- 24 Oct 26 −1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Supply Chain Security went from 82 to 80.
- 20 Oct 26 0
- Package version: 1.5.10 → 1.6.0 functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/chatspatial@1.6.0
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | cafferychen777/ChatSpatial |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/cafferychen777/ChatSpatial/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v1.6.0 |
| Rekor log index | 3341572651 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:d34ab1bff74933527799ff238d9f8b5db8d0519a5e3fef3c90e36d19ea5b4494 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Vulnerabilities 99 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5 | CVE-2026-69247 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-jwv3-5hgf-82ww | CVE-2026-69249 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4c | CVE-2026-69248 | medium | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3552 | CVE-2026-69247 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3553 | CVE-2026-69249 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3554 | CVE-2026-69248 | none | yes | |
| GHSA-22hg-r758-rrw9 | CVE-2026-112390 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-24rc-8hj2-v98c | CVE-2026-96638 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-254f-3936-288h | CVE-2026-112391 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-27h8-gf7j-v5hc | CVE-2026-112392 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-332p-7hrc-92wf | CVE-2026-112393 | critical | yes | |
| GHSA-3j72-p6qg-6xp7 | CVE-2026-96642 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-4558-3h8r-v8xp | CVE-2026-112394 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-45hq-cxwh-f6vc | CVE-2026-55379 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp | CVE-2026-112395 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg | CVE-2026-96641 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-4rr5-89j8-mwwm | CVE-2026-112396 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-4x4j-2g7c-83w6 | CVE-2026-55798 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-58r4-6rv3-gfh8 | CVE-2026-112397 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-5x8w-8jj5-q52h | CVE-2026-112398 | critical | yes | |
| GHSA-5x94-69rx-g8h2 | CVE-2026-54060 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-5xm2-6676-qcp9 | CVE-2026-112399 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-5xmw-vc9v-4wf2 | CVE-2026-42309 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-62p4-gmf7-7g93 | CVE-2026-54058 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-654x-cwwv-5j9c | CVE-2026-114501 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-65qm-jvmh-6pqg | CVE-2026-112400 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-6r8x-57c9-28j4 | CVE-2026-59199 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-74r2-7ff9-mjj2 | CVE-2026-112401 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-78g4-xqwv-q3g8 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes | |
| GHSA-7mwm-ghpf-9vrm | CVE-2026-112402 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-8g5g-8vmr-9782 | CVE-2026-112403 | critical | yes | |
| GHSA-8v84-f9pq-wr9x | CVE-2026-54059 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-9hw9-ch79-4vh6 | CVE-2026-59205 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-9v9v-9qvf-h2hj | CVE-2026-96644 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-c6hw-5grf-ff96 | CVE-2026-112404 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-cfh3-3jmp-rvhc | CVE-2026-25990 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-f2g6-542v-9j58 | CVE-2026-112406 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-fc9g-5qg7-mf45 | CVE-2026-112891 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-fj7v-r99m-22gq | CVE-2026-59198 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-g4qv-2jxx-769h | CVE-2026-96643 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-g7cr-3p24-7wf7 | CVE-2026-96778 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-g842-9rc4-69pw | CVE-2026-96637 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-gg2r-wvfm-q9rx | CVE-2026-112892 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-j4m9-6w36-pw47 | CVE-2026-112893 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-jg86-v3jv-hrpm | CVE-2026-112894 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-jjj6-mw9f-p565 | CVE-2026-59200 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2 | CVE-2026-96640 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-p4wg-p73j-c528 | CVE-2026-112895 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-p8hx-v2p6-rp84 | CVE-2026-96636 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-pchr-8j38-3x4p | CVE-2026-112896 | high | yes |
Showing 50 of 99 vulnerabilities.
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 172 packages
| Packages resolved | 172 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 16 |
| No linked repository | 3 |
| Tree resolution | Partial |
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
How do I install the ChatSpatial MCP server?
ChatSpatial runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx chatspatial. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · chatspatial
claude mcp add cafferychen777-chatspatial -- uvx chatspatial
What is the ChatSpatial MCP server?
ChatSpatial is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.cafferychen777/chatspatial. Schema-enforced spatial transcriptomics analysis with 20 tools and 67 methods via MCP. This page covers its PyPI package (chatspatial).
Is the ChatSpatial MCP server still maintained?
ChatSpatial is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the ChatSpatial MCP server under?
ChatSpatial declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.