Perfume Picks
REMOTE · MCP.PERFUMEPICKS.APP · 2 COMPONENTS
Search the Perfume Picks fragrance database: 10,000+ scents with notes, dupes, and wear data.
Available components
Last scanned (10 hours ago)
Scores higher than 93% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 764 tokens (~95/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 16 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- Tool “search_fragrances” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.0.5 functional
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Oct 26 81
- Tool “find_dupes” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.perfumepicks.app/?src=registry
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.perfumepicks.app | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 21 Oct 2026 | 19 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ee1945e5a61acba8b7c2c333b2ee2e949e |
| SANs: mcp.perfumepicks.app | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.perfumepicks.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| perfumepicks.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.perfumepicks.app/?src=registry | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.perfumepicks.app/?src=registry | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.perfumepicks.app/?src=registry |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_fragrances ~66
Side-by-side comparison: note pyramids, shared and distinct accords, longevity/sillage/compliment scores, concentration, and price difference.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fragrance_a | string | yes | First fragrance — slug or name |
| fragrance_b | string | yes | Second fragrance — slug or name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_dupes ~63
Curated dupes for a fragrance: cheaper scents documented to smell like the original, with match percentage and price comparison. Use for 'what smells like X but costs less' questions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fragrance | string | yes | Fragrance slug or name to find dupes for |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_similar ~58
Fragrances most similar to a given one, from Perfume Picks' precomputed similarity ranking over notes and accords.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fragrance | string | yes | Fragrance slug or name |
| limit | integer | – | Max results (default 5) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_fragrance ~71
Detailed record for one fragrance: full note pyramid (top/heart/base), accords, concentration, community longevity/sillage/compliment scores, and MSRP. Accepts a Perfume Picks slug or a name like 'Bleu de Chanel'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug_or_name | string | yes | Fragrance slug or name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_recommendations ~138
Personalized fragrance picks from note/accord preferences (e.g. 'vanilla', 'oud', 'citrus'), a budget in USD, an occasion ('office', 'date night', 'gift', 'signature scent'), and gender presentation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget | number | – | Max MSRP in USD |
| gender | string | – | Marketed gender category of the fragrance; omit to include all |
| limit | integer | – | Max results (default 5) |
| occasion | string | – | What the fragrance is for |
| preferences | array | yes | Notes or accords the wearer enjoys, e.g. ['vanilla','amber','rose'] |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_fragrances ~171
Full-text search across 10,000+ fragrances in the Perfume Picks database. Filter by brand, fragrance family, gender, and MSRP (USD). Returns note pyramids, accords, and community wear scores with source attribution.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | string | – | Brand name filter, e.g. 'Dior' |
| fragrance_family | string | – | Family filter, e.g. 'woody', 'amber', 'fresh' |
| gender | string | – | Marketed gender category of the fragrance; omit to include all |
| limit | integer | – | Max results (default 10, max 10) |
| price_max | number | – | Maximum MSRP in USD |
| price_min | number | – | Minimum MSRP in USD |
| query | string | – | Free-text search: fragrance or brand name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trending_fragrances ~68
Fragrances Perfume Picks users are adding to their wardrobes most over the last 30 days (falls back to catalog popularity when live activity data is unavailable). The method used is labeled in the response.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Max results (default 10, max 10) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
what_to_wear_tonight ~129
A fragrance suggestion for right now, based on mood, occasion (e.g. 'date', 'office tomorrow', 'night out', 'cozy evening in'), and season — scored with Perfume Picks' community compliment, office-safety, and versatility data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| gender | string | – | Marketed gender category of the fragrance; omit to include all |
| mood | string | – | How you're feeling |
| occasion | string | – | The setting |
| season | string | – | Season to weight the pick toward — heavier, warmer scents in winter; fresher in summer |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Perfume Picks MCP server?
Perfume Picks is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.perfumepicks.app/?src=registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.perfumepicks.app
claude mcp add --transport http bguillow-rgb-perfume-picks 'https://mcp.perfumepicks.app/?src=registry'
What is the Perfume Picks MCP server?
Perfume Picks is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.bguillow-rgb/perfume-picks. Search the Perfume Picks fragrance database: 10,000+ scents with notes, dupes, and wear data. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.perfumepicks.app/?src=registry).
Is the Perfume Picks MCP server safe to use?
Perfume Picks scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Perfume Picks MCP server expose?
Perfume Picks exposes 8 tools: search_fragrances, get_fragrance, find_dupes, find_similar, get_recommendations, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 764 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Perfume Picks MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Perfume Picks without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Perfume Picks MCP server still maintained?
Perfume Picks is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.