Flashift
REMOTE · MCP.FLASHIFT.APP
Zero-key, non-custodial cross-chain crypto swap aggregator for AI agents: 100+ chains, 15+ providers
Available components
Last scanned (3 hours ago)
Scores higher than 60% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 919 tokens (~183/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
- Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.flashift.app/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=flashift.app | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 13 Oct 2026 | 11 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | aaa73320dbb07f3d13e4be10b35d5219 |
| SANs: flashift.app, *.flashift.app | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.flashift.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| flashift.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.flashift.app/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.flashift.app/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.flashift.app/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
create_transaction Create Transaction ~224
Create a new cryptocurrency exchange/swap transaction on Flashift.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | number | yes | Amount of source currency to exchange (greater than 0). |
| fixed | boolean | yes | Whether the rate is fixed (true) or floating (false). |
| network_from | string | yes | Source network (e.g. btc, eth). |
| network_to | string | yes | Target network (e.g. trc20, eth). |
| provider_name | string | yes | Name of the exchange provider chosen from get_estimated_amount (e.g. changenow). |
| symbol_from | string | yes | Source currency symbol (e.g. btc, eth). |
| symbol_to | string | yes | Target currency symbol (e.g. usdt, btc). |
| to_address | string | yes | Destination wallet address where swapped funds will be received. |
| to_extra_id | string | – | Memo, destination tag, or extra ID if required by the target currency/network (e.g. XRP, TON, XLM). |
| user_id | string | – | Optional affiliate or user ID for tracking the transaction. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_currencies Get Currencies ~106
Get supported cryptocurrencies and networks on Flashift. Optionally filter by symbol, network, or search keyword.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Maximum number of items to return (default 50). |
| network | string | – | Filter by network (e.g. eth, bsc, trx, btc). |
| search | string | – | Search query matching symbol, fullname, or network. |
| symbol | string | – | Filter by currency symbol (e.g. btc, eth, usdt). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_estimated_amount Get Estimated Amount ~457
Get estimated exchange amounts, best rates, min/max limits, and available providers for swapping from one cryptocurrency to another. # AI Tags ## Introduction Flashift's AI Tags play a crucial role in enhancing the user experience by providing intelligent insights and recommendations within the API. These tags leverage advanced AI algorithms to analyze various parameters such as KYC levels, transaction rates, and user feedback, enabling users to make informed decisions when selecting exchange services. By integrating AI Tags into the API, Flashift ensures that users can access the most competitive rates and trustworthy services, ultimately leading to a more efficient and reliable transaction process. This not only simplifies the decision-making process for users but also enhances the overall functionality and appeal of the Flashift platform. | AI Tag | Description | |---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | AI Best Rate | Flashift’s AI system analyzes user feedback and exchange features to identify the most accurate and reliable rates, helping users choose the provider with the best rate and highest trustworthiness for a more predictable exchange experience. | | Recommended | Flashift's AI system recommends the exchange service by analyzing various features such as exchange rates, KYC levels, and transaction speed. | | Best Rate | Flashift finds an exchange service that currently offers the most competitive transaction rate. | | Best in KYC | Flashift's cutting-edge AI system identifies an exchange service with the lowest KYC level compared to the others on the list. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | number | yes | Amount of source currency to exchange (greater than 0). |
| exchange_list | string | – | Optional comma-separated list of preferred provider names (e.g. "changenow"). |
| network_from | string | yes | Source network (e.g. btc, eth, trx). |
| network_to | string | yes | Target network (e.g. trc20, eth, sol). |
| symbol_from | string | yes | Source currency symbol (e.g. btc, eth, usdt). |
| symbol_to | string | yes | Target currency symbol (e.g. usdt, btc, sol). |
| type | string | – | Rate type: "float" (floating rate) or "fixed" (fixed rate). Default evaluates both. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_providers Get Providers ~25
Get the list of supported crypto exchange providers and their availability status on Flashift.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_transaction_info Get Transaction Info ~43
Get real-time tracking information and status for an existing crypto exchange transaction by its exchange ID.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| exchange_id | string | yes | The exchange ID returned when creating the transaction. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Flashift MCP server?
Flashift is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.flashift.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.flashift.app
claude mcp add --transport http app-flashift-mcp-server 'https://mcp.flashift.app/mcp'
What is the Flashift MCP server?
Flashift is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.flashift/mcp-server. Zero-key, non-custodial cross-chain crypto swap aggregator for AI agents: 100+ chains, 15+ providers. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.flashift.app/mcp).
Is the Flashift MCP server safe to use?
Flashift scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Flashift MCP server expose?
Flashift exposes 5 tools: get_providers, get_currencies, get_estimated_amount, create_transaction, get_transaction_info. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 855 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Flashift MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Flashift without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Flashift MCP server still maintained?
Flashift is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.