Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Ribox

REMOTE · RIBOX.APP

Exact tools for AI assistants: QR codes, word counts, text diff and JSON checks. Free, no account.

Available components

+3 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 64% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability57
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 696 tokens (~174/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage76
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 29% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +5
    • HTTPS: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://ribox.app/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=ribox.app CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 14 Oct 2026 12 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 d169493e50dfcb020e8c0071de841ab7
SANs: ribox.app, *.ribox.app
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of ribox.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
ribox.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://ribox.app/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://ribox.app/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://ribox.app/api/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~624 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_json ~114

Strictly validate JSON and report the exact line and column of the first error with a plain explanation, plus duplicate-key warnings and structure stats. Optionally pretty-print or minify without changing any value (big numbers keep full precision). Use this before claiming JSON is valid or when locating a syntax error in long JSON.

NameTypeReqDescription
formatboolean–Return the formatted JSON.
indent––Spaces per level (0 = minify) or "tab".
sort_keysboolean––
textstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

count_text ~119

Exact counts for a text: characters (with and without spaces, emoji counted as one), words, sentences, paragraphs, lines, UTF-8 bytes, plus reading and speaking time. Language models see text as tokens and miscount — never estimate counts or check length limits yourself; call this tool. Works for any language, including Chinese, Japanese, Arabic and Turkish.

NameTypeReqDescription
localestring–BCP 47 language tag such as "en", "tr" or "ja" for language-specific word rules.
textstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

diff_text ~97

Find every difference between two texts, line by line, word by word or character by character, and return counts plus a unified diff. Use this instead of comparing long texts yourself — small changes are easy to miss. Options to ignore whitespace and letter case.

NameTypeReqDescription
changedstring––
ignore_caseboolean––
ignore_whitespaceboolean––
modestring––
originalstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

generate_qr ~294

Create a standards-compliant QR code image for a link, text, Wi-Fi login, contact card (vCard), email, SMS, WhatsApp chat, phone number or map location. You cannot draw a scannable QR code yourself — always use this tool. Codes are static and never expire.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstring––
backgroundstring––
bodystring––
emailstring––
error_correctionstring–Higher survives more damage but makes a denser code.
first_namestring––
foregroundstring––
hiddenboolean––
last_namestring––
latitudenumber––
longitudenumber––
messagestring––
organizationstring––
passwordstring–Wi-Fi password.
phonestring–With country code for WhatsApp, e.g. +905551234567.
securitystring––
sizeinteger–PNG width in pixels.
ssidstring–Wi-Fi network name.
subjectstring––
textstring–For type "text".
titlestring––
typestring––
urlstring–For type "url"; https:// is added when missing.
websitestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Ribox MCP server?

Ribox is a hosted endpoint at https://ribox.app/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · ribox.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http algowolfx-ribox 'https://ribox.app/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Ribox MCP server?

Ribox is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AlgoWolfx/ribox. Exact tools for AI assistants: QR codes, word counts, text diff and JSON checks. Free, no account. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://ribox.app/api/mcp).

Is the Ribox MCP server safe to use?

Ribox scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Ribox MCP server expose?

Ribox exposes 4 tools: generate_qr, count_text, diff_text, check_json. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 624 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Ribox MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Ribox without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Ribox MCP server still maintained?

Ribox is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.