Corazor Technology
REMOTE · WWW.CORAZOR.COM
Global AI product engineering partner: services, case studies, fit check, booking
Available components
Last scanned (5 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 459 tokens (~76/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
- Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage79
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 38% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 21 Oct 26 68
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.corazor.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.corazor.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 18 Oct 2026 | 16 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 651db42a91f8fb939a7ba46e5a2e3d158a0 |
| SANs: www.corazor.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.corazor.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| corazor.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.corazor.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.corazor.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.corazor.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_fit Check project fit ~62
Given a short project brief, return the best-matching Corazor services, a recommended engagement model, and the next step.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| brief | string | yes | What the user wants to build or fix. |
| budget | string | – | – |
| timeline | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_booking_link Get booking link ~26
Link where the user can book a free 30-minute intro call with Corazor.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_case_studies Corazor case studies ~41
Shipped client projects with challenge, solution, outcomes, and links. Optionally filter by keyword (industry or technology).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_company_profile Corazor company profile ~59
Who Corazor Technology is: global AI product engineering and technical partner (HQ Gurugram, India; clients in US, UK, Europe, Middle East, APAC, India), working style, roles, contact details, and how to engage.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_services List Corazor services ~57
Full service catalog (AI development, SaaS, web, mobile, audits, SOC 2 / ISO 27001 readiness, continuous assurance) plus engagement models and regions served. Optionally filter by category.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
submit_inquiry Send inquiry to Corazor ~170
Send a project inquiry to Corazor on the user's behalf. Only call with the user's explicit consent and their real name and email. Corazor replies within one business day.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget | string | – | – |
| company | string | – | – |
| country | string | – | Country or time zone. |
| string | yes | Email Corazor should reply to. | |
| message | string | yes | What they are building, who it is for, current stage, and goals. |
| name | string | yes | Full name of the person the inquiry is for. |
| on_behalf_of | string | – | Name of the AI assistant submitting on the user's behalf, if any. |
| phone | string | – | – |
| service | string | – | – |
| timeline | string | – | – |
| website | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Corazor Technology MCP server?
Corazor Technology is a hosted endpoint at https://www.corazor.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.corazor.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-corazor-corazor 'https://www.corazor.com/api/mcp'
What is the Corazor Technology MCP server?
Corazor Technology is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.corazor/corazor. Global AI product engineering partner: services, case studies, fit check, booking. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.corazor.com/api/mcp).
Is the Corazor Technology MCP server safe to use?
Corazor Technology scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Corazor Technology MCP server expose?
Corazor Technology exposes 6 tools: get_company_profile, list_services, get_case_studies, check_fit, get_booking_link, submit_inquiry. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 415 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Corazor Technology MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Corazor Technology without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Corazor Technology MCP server still maintained?
Corazor Technology is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.