Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Polargate

REMOTE · POLARGATE.AI

What Polargate does and how to start a project, read from polargate.ai.

Available components

+3 this week 73 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 60% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 540 tokens (~67/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
  • Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage82
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 46% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “list_products” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 78 → 67 ▲ functional
  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://polargate.ai/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.polargate.ai CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 26 Oct 2026 24 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5b102e60eea350f6fd38d5a7f3142f15ddd
SANs: *.polargate.ai, polargate.ai
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of polargate.ai. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. present 1814, 3799 8, 8 Verified
polargate.ai. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://portal.polargate.ai https://www.googletagmanager.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com; font-src 'self'; media-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://gysinhqxvelxxudbchez.supabase.co https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://vitals.vercel-insights.com https://va.vercel-scripts.com; frame-src 'self' https://challenges.cloudflare.com; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://polargate.ai/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://polargate.ai/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://polargate.ai/api/mcp
MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~478 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_case ~54

The full case study for one project, including the markdown of the page. Use list_cases first to find the slug.

NameTypeReqDescription
localestring––
slugstringyesFor example hotel-marien or kd-tech

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_page ~57

The full text of any page on polargate.ai, as markdown. Give the route, for example /pricing or /es/work/hotel-marien.

NameTypeReqDescription
routestringyesA path on polargate.ai, starting with /

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_pricing ~80

How Polargate engages: every model (Discovery Sprint, fixed-price projects, Care, Grow, the AI visibility audit) with what it includes, who it is for and how it is billed. Polargate does not publish prices: each engagement gets a fixed price, sent privately in writing after a first call.

NameTypeReqDescription
localestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

how_to_start ~43

How to engage Polargate: what the brief asks, the answer time, the languages spoken and where the work is done from.

NameTypeReqDescription
localestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_cases ~78

Projects Polargate has delivered, with the client where the client agreed to be named, measured outcomes, the stack and a link to the live site. Filter by industry or service line.

NameTypeReqDescription
industrystring–hotels, events, leisure, retail, industrial or corporate
localestring––
servicestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_products ~38

Products Polargate makes and owns, as opposed to work for clients. PolarRabbit is a free Mac app.

NameTypeReqDescription
localestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_services ~57

The three service lines (build, grow, care) and every capability under them, with what each includes, the typical timeline, who works on it and how it is priced.

NameTypeReqDescription
localestring–Answer language. Defaults to en.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_site ~71

Find pages by words in their title or description, across all three languages. Returns the page URL and its markdown twin.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
localestring–Restrict to one language
querystringyesWhat to look for, for example hotel, accessibility, AI search

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Polargate MCP server?

Polargate is a hosted endpoint at https://polargate.ai/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · polargate.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ai-polargate-polargate 'https://polargate.ai/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Polargate MCP server?

Polargate is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.polargate/polargate. What Polargate does and how to start a project, read from polargate.ai. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://polargate.ai/api/mcp).

Is the Polargate MCP server safe to use?

Polargate scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Polargate MCP server expose?

Polargate exposes 8 tools: list_services, get_pricing, list_cases, get_case, search_site, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 478 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Polargate MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Polargate without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Polargate MCP server still maintained?

Polargate is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.