io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp
NPM · BETTERPROMPT-MCP · SCANNED SEP 25
MCP server for AI-enhanced prompt engineering and request conversion.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security80
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.18.0, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 32 of 91 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency17
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL returned HTTP 404. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 372 days ago).Pass
- Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability82
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 264 tokens (~37/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
- Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp server?
io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y betterprompt-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · betterprompt-mcp
claude mcp add aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp -- npx -y betterprompt-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"betterprompt-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"betterprompt-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp -- npx -y betterprompt-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"betterprompt-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg betterprompt-mcp
mcp_servers:
aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "betterprompt-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"betterprompt-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y betterprompt-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"aungmyokyaw-betterprompt-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"betterprompt-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 22 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 15 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 25 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/betterprompt-mcp@0.2.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 3 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7 | CVE-2026-25536 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g | CVE-2026-0621 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w | CVE-2025-66414 | high | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 91 packages
| Packages resolved | 91 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 32 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
clear-cache Clear Enhancement Cache ~21
Clear the prompt enhancement cache to free memory or force fresh enhancements
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
enhance-analysis-prompt Enhance Analysis Prompt ~62
Specialized tool for enhancing prompts related to technical analysis, research, and problem-solving
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| depth | string | – | Desired depth of analysis |
| domain | string | – | Specific domain or field of analysis |
| prompt | string | yes | The analysis request to enhance |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
enhance-code-prompt Enhance Code Generation Prompt ~61
Specialized tool for enhancing prompts related to code generation, debugging, and software development
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| complexity | string | – | Target complexity level |
| language | string | – | Programming language or technology stack |
| prompt | string | yes | The code-related request to enhance |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
enhance-prompt Enhance Prompt ~55
Converts user requests to AI-enhanced prompts using world-class prompt engineering techniques
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | The category of enhancement to apply |
| prompt | string | yes | The user request to convert to an AI-enhanced prompt |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get-best-practices Get Best Practices Guide ~20
Retrieve the comprehensive prompt engineering best practices guide
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get-template Get Prompt Template ~28
Retrieve a specific prompt engineering template by category
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Template category to retrieve |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
server-stats Server Statistics ~17
Get server performance statistics and cache information
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp server?
io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp. MCP server for AI-enhanced prompt engineering and request conversion. This page covers its npm package (betterprompt-mcp).
Is the io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 3 known advisories against it as of 25 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp server expose?
io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp exposes 7 tools: enhance-prompt, enhance-code-prompt, enhance-analysis-prompt, get-template, get-best-practices, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 264 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp server under?
io.github.AungMyoKyaw/betterprompt-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.