ai.dsght/public
REMOTE · WWW.DSGHT.AI
Read-only MCP access to DSGHT.ai published foresight and country-grounded claim resolution.
Available components
Last scanned (5 hours ago)
Scores higher than 97% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability86
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 3855 tokens (~50/item across 76 items; 12 tools + 64 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage95
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Oct 26 0
- New resource “European Battery Cell Manufacturing: Meeting 50% of Demand by 2030 — final report” functional
- New resource “European Battery Cell Manufacturing: Meeting 50% of Demand by 2030 — scenario matrix” functional
- New resource “European Battery Cell Manufacturing: Meeting 50% of Demand by 2030 — structural tensions” functional
- 18 Oct 26 0
- New resource “EU AI Act Enforcement and the Future of European B2B SaaS — final report” functional
- New resource “EU AI Act Enforcement and the Future of European B2B SaaS — scenario matrix” functional
- New resource “EU AI Act Enforcement and the Future of European B2B SaaS — structural tensions” functional
- 17 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 3186 → 3597 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 79% → 86% ▲ functional
- New resource “Czech Housing Affordability Outlook to 2032 — final report” functional
- New resource “Czech Housing Affordability Outlook to 2032 — scenario matrix” functional
- New resource “Czech Housing Affordability Outlook to 2032 — structural tensions” functional
- New tool “get_public_claims” functional
- New tool “get_public_forecasts” functional
- 15 Oct 26 0
- New resource “European Heat Pumps 2030: Policy, Power, Capacity — final report” functional
- New resource “European Heat Pumps 2030: Policy, Power, Capacity — scenario matrix” functional
- New resource “European Heat Pumps 2030: Policy, Power, Capacity — structural tensions” functional
- 12 Oct 26 +7
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- MCP protocol: Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28). functional
- MCP protocol version: 2025-11-25 → 2026-07-28 functional
- Tool “detect_tensions” changed its title: Detect Strategy Tensions cosmetic
- Tool “extract_assumptions” changed its title: Extract Strategy Assumptions cosmetic
- Tool “get_country_indicator” changed its title: Get Country Macro Indicator cosmetic
- Tool “get_public_report” changed its title: Get Foresight Report cosmetic
- Tool “get_public_scenarios” changed its title: Get Scenario Matrix cosmetic
- Tool “get_public_tensions” changed its title: Get Structural Tensions cosmetic
- Tool “list_countries” changed its title: List Country Coverage cosmetic
- Tool “list_public_spaces” changed its title: List Public Foresight Spaces cosmetic
- Tool “resolve_country_claim” changed its title: Resolve Country Macro Claim cosmetic
- Tool “search_spaces” changed its title: Search Foresight Spaces cosmetic
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.dsght.ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=dsght.ai | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 26 Sept 2026 | 25 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 9376e0dcc34fcf040e28469b8db67913 |
| SANs: dsght.ai, *.dsght.ai | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.dsght.ai. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | DS published | 1814, 3799 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dsght.ai. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://*.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.langfuse.com https://*.sentry.io https://*.ingest.sentry.io https://va.vercel-scripts.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://gateway.dsght.ai https://*.codesandbox.io https://*.supabase.co wss://*.supabase.co https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://*.googletagmanager.com https://*.langfuse.com https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com https://api.openai.com https://*.sentry.io https://*.ingest.sentry.io https://vitals.vercel-insights.com https://huggingface.co https://*.huggingface.co https://*.hf.co; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-src 'self' https://gateway.dsght.ai https://artifacts.dsght.ai https://*.codesandbox.io https://www.googletagmanager.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.dsght.ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.dsght.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.dsght.ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
detect_tensions Detect Strategy Tensions ~79
Use when the user pastes strategy text and asks what is internally inconsistent: detects the structural contradictions — where the text quietly bets on two things that cannot both hold. Stateless taster; nothing is stored. DSGHT surfaces the conflict rather than smoothing it over.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | Strategy / plan / memo text to analyze (plain text). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
extract_assumptions Extract Strategy Assumptions ~94
Use when the user pastes a strategy, plan, or memo and wants its hidden bets made explicit: extracts the falsifiable, load-bearing assumptions (dated/quantified bets + structural findings). Stateless taster — nothing is stored; the persistent per-company assumption registry with monitoring and a Brier track record is the authenticated tier.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | Strategy / plan / memo text to analyze (plain text). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_country_indicator Get Country Macro Indicator ~117
Look up a country's authoritative macro indicator (inflation | gdp_growth) directly — deterministic, offline, cited. Use whenever you need a real macro figure instead of recalling one from memory: give the jurisdiction (CZ, DE, US, ...) and indicator, plus an optional year (omit for the full annual series).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| indicator | string | yes | – |
| jurisdiction | string | yes | ISO code, e.g. CZ, DE, US |
| year | string | – | optional 4-digit year, e.g. 2022 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_public_claims Get Cited Claims ~141
Get the evidence claims behind a published future-space that carry a cited source page (URL + quoted passage), with a census of how many claims are verified, cited or uncited. Use when you need quotable, source-backed facts on a covered topic. Uncited claims are counted, never served as sourced.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | page size (default 25) |
| offset | integer | – | page start (default 0) |
| query | string | – | keywords every returned claim must contain |
| slug | string | yes | future-space slug from list_public_spaces |
| status | string | – | only this citation status (default: both) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_public_forecasts Get Forecast Track Record ~105
Get the append-only forecast registry of a published future-space — every checkable signpost with the probability, threshold and date stated in advance, its resolution and Brier score — plus the track record. Use when the user asks how reliable DSGHT's forecasts have been, or what dated, checkable predictions a space makes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | future-space slug from list_public_spaces |
| status | string | – | only forecasts with this status (default: all) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_public_report Get Foresight Report ~60
Get the latest full foresight report (markdown) for a published future-space. Use when the user wants the detailed analysis, or a quotable, cited source on a covered topic.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | future-space slug from list_public_spaces |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_public_scenarios Get Scenario Matrix ~78
Get the scenario matrix with probabilities for a published future-space. Use when the user asks how a domain (banking, energy, CEE markets, ...) might play out, what the plausible futures are, or wants to reason across scenarios instead of a single forecast.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | future-space slug from list_public_spaces |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_public_tensions Get Structural Tensions ~77
Get the structural tensions — the load-bearing contradictions — for a published future-space. Use when the user asks what forces conflict, what could break a strategy, or what the tensions/paradoxes are in a covered domain. DSGHT surfaces contradictions rather than averaging them.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | future-space slug from list_public_spaces |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_countries List Country Coverage ~55
List the jurisdictions and macro indicators (inflation, GDP growth) available to resolve_country_claim and get_country_indicator, with per-country year coverage and source. Call this to check coverage before resolving a claim or looking up an indicator.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_public_spaces List Public Foresight Spaces ~49
List the DSGHT future-spaces published for public use (slug, topic, status, depth). Call this first to discover what foresight is available before fetching scenarios, tensions, or a report.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
resolve_country_claim Resolve Country Macro Claim ~168
Use this WHENEVER the user states or asks you to verify a numeric macro claim (inflation, GDP, interest rates): settle it against the claim's OWN country's authoritative series instead of answering from memory, which risks the wrong jurisdiction (e.g. U.S. CPI for a Czech claim). Binds the claim to a jurisdiction (CZ, DE, ...) and returns a cited above/below verdict. Deterministic and offline.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| direction | string | yes | – |
| jurisdiction | string | yes | ISO code, e.g. CZ, DE |
| resolve_by | string | – | ISO date the claim resolves by, e.g. 2022-12-31 |
| subject | string | yes | e.g. "inflation", "GDP growth" |
| threshold | number | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_spaces Search Foresight Spaces ~80
Find the most relevant published DSGHT future-space by keyword (topic + report text, plain-text ranked, no AI). Use this to locate a space before calling get_public_scenarios / get_public_tensions / get_public_report when you do not already know the slug.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | search terms, e.g. "open banking consent" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the ai.dsght/public MCP server?
ai.dsght/public is a hosted endpoint at https://www.dsght.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.dsght.ai
claude mcp add --transport http ai-dsght-public 'https://www.dsght.ai/mcp'
What is the ai.dsght/public MCP server?
ai.dsght/public is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.dsght/public. Read-only MCP access to DSGHT.ai published foresight and country-grounded claim resolution. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.dsght.ai/mcp).
Is the ai.dsght/public MCP server safe to use?
ai.dsght/public scores 89 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ai.dsght/public MCP server expose?
ai.dsght/public exposes 12 tools: list_public_spaces, get_public_tensions, get_public_scenarios, get_public_report, get_public_claims, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,103 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the ai.dsght/public MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to ai.dsght/public without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the ai.dsght/public MCP server still maintained?
ai.dsght/public is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the ai.dsght/public MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on ai.dsght/public, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.