Acquisition.gov
PYPI · ACQUISITION-GOV-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20
Acquisition.gov FAR Overhaul model parts, agency deviations, PDFs, and guidance. 5 tools.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 37 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability54
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 223 tokens (~44/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
- Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the Acquisition.gov MCP server?
Acquisition.gov runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx acquisition-gov-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · acquisition-gov-mcp
claude mcp add com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp -- uvx acquisition-gov-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"acquisition-gov-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"acquisition-gov-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp -- uvx acquisition-gov-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"acquisition-gov-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp --command uvx --arg acquisition-gov-mcp
mcp_servers:
com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp:
command: "uvx"
args: ["acquisition-gov-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"acquisition-gov-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp -t stdio -c uvx -a acquisition-gov-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-1102tools-acquisition-gov-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"acquisition-gov-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 13 Sept 26 −14
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Package version: 1.0.2 → 1.0.8 functional
- Package version: 1.0.2 → 1.0.6 functional
- Package version: 1.0.2 → 1.0.4 functional
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/acquisition-gov-mcp@1.0.8
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 37 packages
| Packages resolved | 37 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_rfo_agency_deviation ~49
Resolve an indexed source ID and return page-numbered official PDF text.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_end | – | – | – |
| page_start | integer | – | – |
| source_id | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_rfo_guidance ~41
Return an allowlisted Acquisition.gov RFO FAQ or guidance resource.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor | – | – | – |
| heading | – | – | – |
| resource | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_rfo_part ~50
Return parsed, paginated model-deviation text for one FAR part.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor | – | – | – |
| max_characters | integer | – | – |
| part | integer | yes | – |
| section | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_rfo_agency_deviations ~44
List official agency-deviation links discovered through the RFO index.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agency | – | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| part | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_rfo_parts ~39
List official RFO model parts and counts of posted agency deviations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agency | – | – | – |
| part | – | – | – |
| updated_since | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the Acquisition.gov MCP server?
Acquisition.gov is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.1102tools/acquisition-gov-mcp. Acquisition.gov FAR Overhaul model parts, agency deviations, PDFs, and guidance. 5 tools. This page covers its PyPI package (acquisition-gov-mcp).
Is the Acquisition.gov MCP server safe to use?
Acquisition.gov scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Acquisition.gov MCP server expose?
Acquisition.gov exposes 5 tools: list_rfo_parts, get_rfo_part, list_rfo_agency_deviations, get_rfo_agency_deviation, get_rfo_guidance. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 223 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Acquisition.gov MCP server still maintained?
Acquisition.gov is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Acquisition.gov MCP server under?
Acquisition.gov declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.