Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service
REMOTE · ADVISORSAI.AI · SCANNED SEP 21
Describe a store's problem: get the matching service, its fixed price, and a request link.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability86
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 447 tokens (~89/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
- Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service MCP server?
Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service is a hosted endpoint at https://advisorsai.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · advisorsai.ai
claude mcp add --transport http ai-advisorsai-service-navigator 'https://advisorsai.ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-advisorsai-service-navigator": {
"url": "https://advisorsai.ai/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"ai-advisorsai-service-navigator": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://advisorsai.ai/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.ai-advisorsai-service-navigator] url = "https://advisorsai.ai/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"ai-advisorsai-service-navigator": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://advisorsai.ai/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add ai-advisorsai-service-navigator --url 'https://advisorsai.ai/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
ai-advisorsai-service-navigator:
url: "https://advisorsai.ai/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"ai-advisorsai-service-navigator": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://advisorsai.ai/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add ai-advisorsai-service-navigator -t streamable-http -u 'https://advisorsai.ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-advisorsai-service-navigator": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://advisorsai.ai/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +5
- HTTPS: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 6 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://advisorsai.ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=advisorsai.ai | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 18 Sept 2026 | 17 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 1a95e829e02f3c2f0ec791e6f11f5e54 |
| SANs: advisorsai.ai, *.advisorsai.ai | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of advisorsai.ai. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | present | 3799 | 8 | Verified |
| advisorsai.ai. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://advisorsai.ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://advisorsai.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://advisorsai.ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
advisors_catalog_get_service Get one public service and its packages ~69
Use after a service is identified and the user needs its published scope, limits, commercial packages, sample, and terms. Does not determine eligibility or order.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | Response language: ar or en. |
| service_id | string | yes | One id returned by the list tool. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| catalog_fingerprint_sha256 | string | yes | – |
| catalog_version | string | yes | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| service | – | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
advisors_catalog_list_services List the five public services ~52
Use when a user asks what Advisors AI offers. Returns exactly five public services; do not use it to infer fit or to create an order.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | Response language: ar or en. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution_status | string | yes | – |
| catalog_fingerprint_sha256 | string | yes | – |
| catalog_version | string | yes | – |
| deployed_channel | string | yes | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| package_count | integer | yes | – |
| service_count | integer | yes | – |
| services | array | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
advisors_catalog_match_service Route a business need to a public service ~74
Use when the user describes a business need but has not chosen a service. Returns at most two deterministic routing suggestions; it is not a diagnosis or proof of fit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | Response language: ar or en. |
| need | string | yes | Business need only; do not include credentials or personal data. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| claim_boundary | – | – | – |
| confidence | – | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| question | – | – | – |
| recommendations | array | yes | – |
| scoring_method | string | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
advisors_order_prepare_link Prepare a normal request link for a selected package ~77
Use only after the user explicitly selects a package returned by the service tool. Returns the ordinary login/request link; it does not create an order, confirm eligibility, or charge anything.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | Request-page language: ar or en. |
| package_id | string | yes | Published package id returned by advisors_catalog_get_service. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| attribution_status | string | yes | – |
| charges_customer | boolean | yes | – |
| creates_order | boolean | yes | – |
| eligibility_status | string | yes | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| package | – | yes | – |
| request_url | string | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
advisors_site_check_basics Check declared public-page machine basics ~94
Use only when a user asks to inspect a public website. Measures bounded page, robots, structured-data, sitemap, and experimental llms.txt signals. It does not measure AI mentions, rank, visibility, firewall passage, or sales.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | Response language: ar or en. |
| url | string | yes | Public HTTP(S) website; private networks, credentials, and unusual ports are rejected. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| checked_origin | – | – | – |
| coverage_percent | – | – | – |
| errors | array | – | – |
| external_data_policy | – | – | – |
| measured_at_utc | – | – | – |
| measurement | – | – | – |
| message | – | – | – |
| miss_count | – | – | – |
| next_step | – | – | – |
| not_measured | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| scope | – | – | – |
| score_percent | – | – | – |
| separate_live_measurement | – | – | – |
| signals | array | – | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
| unchecked_count | – | – | – |
No examples provided.
What is the Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service MCP server?
Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.advisorsai/service-navigator. Describe a store's problem: get the matching service, its fixed price, and a request link. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://advisorsai.ai/mcp).
Is the Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service MCP server safe to use?
Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service MCP server expose?
Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service exposes 5 tools: advisors_catalog_list_services, advisors_catalog_get_service, advisors_catalog_match_service, advisors_site_check_basics, advisors_order_prepare_link. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 366 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service MCP server still maintained?
Advisors AI — Route a Store Need to a Service is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.