Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SERP Title Width

NPM · MCP-SERVER-SERP-TITLE-WIDTH

Check if Chinese, Japanese and Korean page titles fit Google results by pixel width, not char count

0 this week 63 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 31% of npm servers

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security81
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 94 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1001 tokens (~500/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 24 Oct 26 −5
    • CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
  • 23 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 22 Oct 26 53

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/mcp-server-serp-title-width@0.1.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 1 finding
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 CVE-2023-54404 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 94 packages
Packages resolved 94
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~1,001 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_title_files ~522

Read the first <title> element from local .html/.htm files and run the same pixel-width checks as measure_titles across all of them. Each path may be a file (read whatever its extension) or a directory; directories are searched recursively for .html and .htm files, skipping node_modules and names that start with '.', and stop with an error after 20000 files. Only the title in the document head counts; titles in comments, <svg>, <script> and similar are ignored. Reads only, never writes. Character references &amp; &lt; &gt; &quot; &apos; &nbsp; and numeric references are decoded before measuring. Model: Google search results on google.com with the zh-TW (Traditional Chinese, Taiwan) interface, Chrome on Windows, title font Arial 22px, desktop result column 652px, mobile first line 343px, measured 2026-09-18. Full-width characters (East Asian Width W or F: CJK ideographs, kana, Hangul, full-width punctuation, most emoji) count 22px; printable ASCII uses Arial's own advance widths at 22px; other half-width characters count 12.2px; zero-width characters count 0 and each grapheme cluster (such as an emoji ZWJ sequence) counts once. Kerning is not modelled. Tiers: safe <= 572px, long > 572px (warning), edge > 630px (must fix), cut > 648px (must fix). Japanese and Korean use the same full-width assumption but were not separately measured. Google may rewrite title links, so a passing title is not a guarantee of what is displayed. Fails: tier edge or cut; more than 2 separators (、 or ,) in a title over 572px; more than 1 full-width question mark (?); a trailing phrase after the last 、 or , shared by more than 2 titles in the same call (boilerplate; a site name after a colon is not counted, as Google suggests that pattern); empty title; the same 2-4 ideograph run 3 or more times (keyword stuffing). Warnings: tier long; more than 2 separators in a title within 572px; text before the first ?:、,wider than the 343px mobile first line.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathsarrayyesAbsolute paths to HTML files or directories on this machine, e.g. a static site's build output.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

measure_titles ~479

Measure page titles by rendered pixel width in Google search results, not by character count, and check them for truncation and title-link problems. Pass every title of a site in one call so boilerplate tails shared across titles are detected. Returns per title: px, full_width_units (px / 22), tier (safe/long/edge/cut), fails, warns; plus boilerplate_tails for the whole set and verdict 'fix' if any title fails. Model: Google search results on google.com with the zh-TW (Traditional Chinese, Taiwan) interface, Chrome on Windows, title font Arial 22px, desktop result column 652px, mobile first line 343px, measured 2026-09-18. Full-width characters (East Asian Width W or F: CJK ideographs, kana, Hangul, full-width punctuation, most emoji) count 22px; printable ASCII uses Arial's own advance widths at 22px; other half-width characters count 12.2px; zero-width characters count 0 and each grapheme cluster (such as an emoji ZWJ sequence) counts once. Kerning is not modelled. Tiers: safe <= 572px, long > 572px (warning), edge > 630px (must fix), cut > 648px (must fix). Japanese and Korean use the same full-width assumption but were not separately measured. Google may rewrite title links, so a passing title is not a guarantee of what is displayed. Fails: tier edge or cut; more than 2 separators (、 or ,) in a title over 572px; more than 1 full-width question mark (?); a trailing phrase after the last 、 or , shared by more than 2 titles in the same call (boilerplate; a site name after a colon is not counted, as Google suggests that pattern); empty title; the same 2-4 ideograph run 3 or more times (keyword stuffing). Warnings: tier long; more than 2 separators in a title within 572px; text before the first ?:、,wider than the 343px mobile first line.

NameTypeReqDescription
titlesarrayyesTitle strings exactly as they appear in <title>, already decoded ("&" not "&amp;").

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SERP Title Width MCP server?

SERP Title Width runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y mcp-server-serp-title-width. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · mcp-server-serp-title-width

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add adsandcode-serp-title-width -- npx -y mcp-server-serp-title-width
Common questions

What is the SERP Title Width MCP server?

SERP Title Width is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.adsandcode/serp-title-width. Check if Chinese, Japanese and Korean page titles fit Google results by pixel width, not char count. This page covers its npm package (mcp-server-serp-title-width).

Is the SERP Title Width MCP server safe to use?

SERP Title Width scores 63 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SERP Title Width MCP server expose?

SERP Title Width exposes 2 tools: measure_titles, check_title_files. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,001 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the SERP Title Width MCP server still maintained?

SERP Title Width is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the SERP Title Width MCP server under?

SERP Title Width declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.