SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server
REMOTE · B2B-CONTRACT-PARSER-API.ONRENDER.COM
B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP server for live RFPs, contract parsing, compliance & proposal tools.
Available components
Last scanned (3 hours ago)
Scores higher than 69% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability59
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 29405 tokens (~506/item across 58 items; 58 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
- Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 58 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 58 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 0
- Tool “audit_section_508_vpat” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 16129 → 29405 ▼ functional
- New tool “audit_cyber_incident_dfars_7012” functional
- New tool “audit_govt_furnished_property_gfp” functional
- New tool “audit_itar_ear_export_control” functional
- New tool “audit_organizational_ethics_far_52_203_13” functional
- New tool “audit_service_contract_act_wage” functional
- New tool “generate_ai_governance_nist_ai_rmf_omb_m24” functional
- New tool “generate_award_fee_plan_incentive_maximizer” functional
- New tool “generate_cdrls_did_data_deliverables” functional
- New tool “generate_cost_accounting_cas_ds2” functional
- New tool “generate_cui_marking_distribution_plan” functional
- New tool “generate_doe_national_lab_mando_subcontract” functional
- New tool “generate_evms_ipmdr_variance_analysis” functional
- New tool “generate_fedramp_equivalency_body_of_evidence” functional
- New tool “generate_gsa_tdr_quarterly_sales_iff_reconciler” functional
- New tool “generate_gwac_task_order_fair_opportunity” functional
- New tool “generate_justification_ja_sole_source” functional
- New tool “generate_mentor_protege_jv_agreement” functional
- New tool “generate_novated_merger_change_of_name_far_42” functional
- New tool “generate_oconus_sofa_defense_logistics” functional
- New tool “generate_rea_equitable_adjustment” functional
- New tool “generate_section_l_m_proposal_red_team_scorer” functional
- New tool “generate_state_local_cooperative_piggyback” functional
- New tool “generate_termination_for_convenience_settlement” functional
- New tool “generate_value_engineering_vecp” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- 30 Oct 26 0
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 1.5.0 ▼ security
- Tool “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “generate_compliance_matrix” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “generate_sources_sought_response” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “match_capability_statement” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “scan_far_dfars_clauses” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_historical_awards” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 11386 → 16129 ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added a required parameter “award_notice_or_debrief_text”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added a required parameter “rfp_section_m_and_bidder_context”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” added a required parameter “rfp_security_and_ato_requirements”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” added a required parameter “system_architecture_and_boundary_context”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” added a required parameter “current_and_prior_contracts_portfolio”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” added a required parameter “target_solicitation_and_sow_text”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” added a required parameter “bidder_solution_and_key_personnel_context”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the required parameter “rfp_section_m_and_submitted_proposal_excerpts” ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the required parameter “unsuccessful_offeror_notice_and_debrief_text” ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” dropped the required parameter “cloud_hosting_and_inherited_controls_context” ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” dropped the required parameter “system_architecture_and_rfp_cyber_text” ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” dropped the required parameter “existing_contracts_and_corporate_relationships” ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” dropped the required parameter “new_solicitation_scope_and_oci_clauses” ▼ functional
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” dropped the required parameter “proposed_solution_and_key_personnel” ▼ functional
- New tool “audit_dcaa_accounting_sf1408” functional
- New tool “audit_foci_dd254_clearance” functional
- New tool “generate_capture_black_hat_review” functional
- New tool “generate_data_rights_assertion_table” functional
- New tool “generate_ota_white_paper” functional
- New tool “generate_phase_in_transition_plan” functional
- New tool “generate_post_award_cpar_rebuttal” functional
- New tool “generate_quality_assurance_qasp” functional
- New tool “generate_small_business_participation” functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added an optional parameter “analysis_mode” cosmetic
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added an optional parameter “procurement_jurisdiction” cosmetic
- “audit_contract_risks” added an optional parameter “focus_categories” cosmetic
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” added an optional parameter “target_ato_timeline_days” cosmetic
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” added an optional parameter “proposed_bidding_role_and_teaming_structure” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” added an optional parameter “presentation_format” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” added an optional parameter “total_session_minutes” cosmetic
- “generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization” added an optional parameter “sponsoring_agency_or_program” cosmetic
- “get_live_solicitations” added an optional parameter “closing_after” cosmetic
- “scan_far_dfars_clauses” added an optional parameter “handles_cui_or_cdi” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” added an optional parameter “limit” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” added an optional parameter “max_amount_usd” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” added an optional parameter “min_amount_usd” cosmetic
- “classify_naics_psc_nigp” reworded the description of “context_type” cosmetic
- “extract_pricing_schedule” reworded the description of “expected_document_type” cosmetic
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” reworded the description of “target_authorization_framework” cosmetic
- “generate_compliance_matrix” reworded the description of “proposal_methodology” cosmetic
- “generate_rfp_response” reworded the description of “target_section_type” cosmetic
- “generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization” reworded the description of “target_phase_and_program” cosmetic
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- “match_capability_statement” reworded the description of “target_pursuit_role” cosmetic
- “parse_b2b_contract” reworded the description of “document_type_hint” cosmetic
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the optional parameter “award_and_debrief_timeline_context” cosmetic
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the optional parameter “target_acquisition_regime” cosmetic
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” dropped the optional parameter “target_impact_level” cosmetic
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” dropped the optional parameter “proposed_mitigation_posture” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” dropped the optional parameter “known_incumbent_and_risk_areas” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” dropped the optional parameter “presentation_format_mode” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” made “keywords” optional cosmetic
- 29 Oct 26 +1
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- New tool “audit_supply_chain_scrm” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- New tool “audit_section_508_vpat” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- 27 Oct 26 0
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- New tool “generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onrender.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137 |
| SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onrender.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
analyze_debriefing_bid_protest Analyze GovCon Post-Award Debriefing, FAR 15.506 Q&A & GAO Bid-Protest Viability ~660
Analyze an Unsuccessful Offeror Notice, SSEB evaluation scorecard, RFP Section M criteria, and submitted proposal excerpts to generate strategic FAR 15.506 / DFARS 252.215-7016 Enhanced Debriefing follow-up questions, a 0-100 GAO Bid-Protest Viability Score, a Go/No-Go protest recommendation, CICA 31 U.S.C. 3553 automatic stay deadline calculations, a 4-C.F.R. Part 21 Protest Grounds Matrix (Unstated Evaluation Criteria, Disparate Treatment, Flawed Best-Value Tradeoff, Misleading Discussions), and an Executive Recompete/Corrective-Action Playbook. This is a read-only, stateless post-award diagnostic and debriefing analysis call that provides structured procurement intelligence rather than formal legal representation (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `unsuccessful_offeror_notice_and_debrief_text` accepts 30 to 100,000 characters, `rfp_section_m_and_submitted_proposal_excerpts` accepts 30 to 100,000 characters, optional `award_and_debrief_timeline_context` anchors the 10-day GAO filing and 5-day CICA stay clock, and `target_acquisition_regime` calibrates rules across DoD DFARS Enhanced Debriefings, Civilian FAR Part 15, FAR 16.505 Task Orders >$10M/$35M, and FAR 8.405-2 GSA MAS). Use this tool after contract award notification when preparing for a FAR 15.506 post-award debriefing or evaluating GAO/COFC bid-protest grounds; use `match_capability_statement` instead for pre-bid Gate-1 Bid/No-Bid Pwin scoring, or `analyze_rfp_amendment_diff` for pre-award SF-30 solicitation amendments. Use this tool when evaluating an unsuccessful offeror notice or preparing FAR 15.506 enhanced debriefing questions and GAO/COFC bid-protest viability analyses; use `generate_cpars_past_performance` or `generate_post_award_cpar_rebuttal` instead for CPARS performance evaluations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| analysis_mode | string | – | Perspective mode: 'unsuccessful_offeror_debrief_and_protest' (default, FAR 15.506 debrief questions + GAO protest merits audit), 'winning_awardee_intervention_defense' (defend contract award as Inter… |
| award_notice_or_debrief_text | string | yes | Raw text from the Agency Unsuccessful Offeror Notice, Post-Award Debriefing letter/slides, Source Selection Decision Document (SSDD) excerpt, or competitor protest allegations. |
| procurement_jurisdiction | string | – | Governing procurement protest forum and jurisdiction. |
| rfp_section_m_and_bidder_context | string | yes | RFP Section L/M evaluation criteria, weighting hierarchy (Best-Value Tradeoff vs. LPTA), and summary of the bidder's submitted ratings, evaluated price, and proposal strengths/weaknesses. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| far_15_506_debriefing_questions | array | – | Strategic FAR 15.506 / DoD Enhanced Debriefing questions to submit to the Contracting Officer. |
| protest_grounds_or_defense_matrix | array | – | Detailed GAO/COFC protest grounds (or Awardee Intervenor defenses) mapped to FAR/GAO precedent. |
| protest_viability_or_defense_score | integer | – | Overall 0-100 score measuring GAO/COFC protest sustain probability (or Awardee Defense strength when in winning_awardee_intervention_defense mode). |
| ready_to_send_debrief_request_or_counsel_memo | string | – | Ready-to-send FAR 15.506 Enhanced Debriefing Request Letter & Questions (or Executive Bid-Protest / Intervenor Strategy Memo). |
| recommended_executive_decision | string | – | Clear executive recommendation (e.g., 'PURSUE_ENHANCED_DEBRIEF_THEN_GAO_PROTEST', 'FILE_AGENCY_LEVEL_CORRECTIVE_ACTION_REQUEST', 'DO_NOT_PROTEST_PRESERVE_CUSTOMER_GOODWILL', or 'INTERVENE_AND_MOVE_TO… |
| statutory_deadline_calendar | object | – | Strict FAR 15.505/15.506, DFARS 215.506-70, and CICA (31 U.S.C. 3553) automatic-stay deadline schedule. |
| task_order_jurisdictional_bar_check | string | – | Audit of FASA task-order protest jurisdiction bars under FAR 16.505(a)(10) ($35M DoD / $10M Civilian threshold) or FAR 8.405-5 GSA Schedule rules. |
No examples provided.
analyze_rfp_amendment_diff Diff SF-30 RFP Amendments & Q&A Logs Against Base Solicitation ~330
Diff base RFP/SOW text against subsequent SF-30 Solicitation Amendments, SLED Addenda, and official Government Q&A logs to flag altered `shall`/`must` mandates, deadline extensions, page-limit revisions, CLIN pricing changes, de-facto Q&A requirements, and invalidated proposal sections with Shipley redraft language. This is a read-only, stateless change-impact analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `base_solicitation_text` and `amendment_or_qa_text` accept up to 100,000 characters each, and providing optional `current_proposal_outline` enables targeted auditing of which specific drafted proposal volumes/pages are invalidated). Use this tool whenever an agency issues an SF-30 amendment, addendum, or Q&A response matrix after initial RFP release; use `generate_compliance_matrix` instead when shredding an initial base RFP for the first time.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amendment_or_qa_text | string | yes | Subsequent SF-30 Amendment text, state/local SLED Addendum text, or official Contracting Officer Q&A clarification matrix to diff against the base solicitation. |
| base_solicitation_text | string | yes | Original base RFP text from Section B (CLINs), Section C/PWS (Statement of Work), Section L (Instructions/Deadlines/Page Limits), or Section M (Evaluation Criteria). |
| current_proposal_outline | string | – | Optional summary of the bidder's in-progress proposal outline, volume page allocations, or technical baseline used to pinpoint exact sections that must be rewritten. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amendment_impact_summary | object | – | Executive roll-up of amendment severity, rework risk score, deadline shifts, and mandatory SF-30 acknowledgment rules. |
| invalidated_proposal_sections | array | – | Bidder proposal sections invalidated by the amendment, paired with ready-to-paste replacement narrative. |
| qa_clarification_rulings | array | – | Structured breakdown of Government Q&A answers, flagging hidden de-facto requirements and competitive impacts. |
| requirement_and_clin_deltas | array | – | Ordered list of material requirement, CLIN pricing, page limit, evaluation criteria, and deadline changes. |
No examples provided.
answer_security_questionnaire Respond to SOC 2, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 & CMMC Security Questionnaires ~468
Draft audit-ready responses to vendor security questionnaires (SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP Moderate/High, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2/3, CMMC 2.0, CAIQ/SIG/HECVAT) with cross-framework control citations, an estimated DoD SPRS score (-203 to 110), required evidence artifacts, and POA&M remediation items for any control gaps. This is a read-only, stateless advisory responder (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; maps each question in `questionnaire_text` against the vendor's `security_posture_summary`, while `target_framework` selects 'auto_detect' [default] or locks control citations to a specific standard and flags any unsupported controls as 'Partially Met' or 'POA&M Required' rather than fabricating compliance). Use this tool when completing customer due-diligence questionnaires, SSP control tables, or DoD SPRS self-assessments; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead to audit FAR/DFARS solicitation clauses, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general RFP Section C/L/M requirements.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| questionnaire_text | string | yes | Numbered or bulleted security questionnaire items from an enterprise SIG/CAIQ/HECVAT sheet, customer infosec assessment, or Federal RFP / NIST 800-171 SSP checklist. |
| security_posture_summary | string | yes | Required summary of the vendor's actual security stack, cloud hosting (e.g., AWS GovCloud), active certifications (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP), encryption (FIPS 140-3, AES-256), MFA/IAM, and S… |
| target_framework | string | – | Compliance control mapping mode: 'auto_detect' (default, infers framework from questionnaire text), 'soc2_iso27001' (AICPA TSC & ISO 27001 Annex A), 'nist_800_171_cmmc' (110 CMMC 2.0 Level 2 controls… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| executive_compliance_attestation | string | – | Executive CISO attestation paragraph summarizing the vendor's security architecture, certifications, and shared-responsibility model. |
| overall_readiness_score | integer | – | Overall security questionnaire readiness score (0-100) based on control alignment. |
| poam_and_remediation_items | array | – | Actionable Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) items or continuous improvement recommendations for any partial or open controls. |
| question_responses | array | – | Question-by-question auditor-ready responses with cross-framework control citations and evidence artifacts. |
| questionnaire_title | string | – | Inferred security questionnaire title, buyer domain, and compliance scope. |
| sprs_and_framework_summary | object | – | Summary of detected frameworks, estimated DoD SPRS / GRC maturity impact, and control counts. |
No examples provided.
audit_contract_risks Audit Contract Risks & Generate Legal Redlines ~295
Audit commercial and B2B legal agreements (MSAs, NDAs, SaaS terms, subcontracts) to detect high-risk clauses, compute a 0-100 overall risk score, and generate verbatim clause quotes paired with ready-to-paste fallback redline language. This operation is read-only, stateless, and non-destructive (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `raw_text` accepts 50 to 100,000 characters, and `party_perspective` shifts redline rewrites to protect the 'vendor', 'buyer', or 'neutral' counsel). Use this tool when reviewing commercial/legal terms (indemnification, liability caps, IP ownership, termination for convenience); use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for federal FAR/DFARS/CMMC regulatory flow-down audits, or `parse_b2b_contract` for basic metadata extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| focus_categories | array | – | Optional list of specific clause risk categories to prioritize during the audit. |
| party_perspective | string | – | Negotiating party perspective ('vendor' protects service provider liability/IP, 'buyer' strengthens customer remedies/SLAs, 'neutral' balances mutual terms). |
| raw_text | string | yes | Full or partial legal contract text (MSA, NDA, subcontract, or SaaS agreement) to audit for commercial, IP, indemnification, and termination risks (50 to 100,000 characters). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_type | string | – | Identified legal document type (e.g., 'Master Services Agreement', 'Mutual NDA', 'Statement of Work'). |
| executive_summary | string | – | High-level deal-desk summary of the contract's risk posture and primary negotiation blockers. |
| flagged_clauses | array | – | Detailed list of risky clauses identified in the contract, ordered by severity. |
| missing_standard_protections | array | – | List of standard protective clauses missing from the contract (e.g., 'No Limitation of Liability cap'). |
| overall_risk_level | string | – | Aggregate risk severity classification ('LOW', 'MEDIUM', 'HIGH', or 'CRITICAL'). |
| overall_risk_score | integer | – | Quantified overall risk score from 0 (minimal risk) to 100 (critical/unacceptable exposure). |
| party_perspective | string | – | The negotiating perspective used to evaluate risks ('vendor', 'buyer', or 'neutral'). |
No examples provided.
audit_cyber_incident_dfars_7012 DFARS 252.204-7012 (72-Hour DIBNet) & CIRCIA Cyber Incident Reporting Package ~534
Evaluate CUI/CDI security incidents against DFARS 252.204-7012, CISA CIRCIA, and FedRAMP incident SLAs, generating a structured 72-hour DoD DIBNet ICF report, 90-day forensic media preservation checklist, and subcontractor flow-down notifications. Returns a strictly validated `Dfars7012IncidentResponse` JSON object containing `incident_reporting_determination`, `dibnet_72_hour_icf_report_fields`, `forensic_90_day_preservation_and_sla_clock`, and `dc3_damage_assessment_and_prime_flowdown_notices` grounded in DFARS 252.204-7012(c)–(m) (72-Hour DoD DIBNet Reporting & 90-Day Image Preservation), CISA CIRCIA (6 U.S.C. § 681b), & NIST SP 800-61r2. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `security_incident_telemetry_and_affected_contracts_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `regulatory_reporting_regimes` and `assurance_certificate_and_cloud_posture` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing DFARS 252.204-7012 (72-Hour DIBNet) & CIRCIA Cyber Incident Reporting Package workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| assurance_certificate_and_cloud_posture | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'DoD ECA Medium Token Assurance Certificate Active; Enclave Hosted on AWS GovCloud (US) FedRAMP High / IL5'). |
| regulatory_reporting_regimes | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'DFARS_252_204_7012_72Hr_DIBNet_Plus_CISA_CIRCIA_72Hr_And_FedRAMP_US_CERT'). |
| security_incident_telemetry_and_affected_contracts_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for DFARS 252.204-7012 (72-Hour DIBNet) & CIRCIA Cyber Incident Reporting Package (15 to 45,000 charac… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dc3_damage_assessment_and_prime_flowdown_notices | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| dibnet_72_hour_icf_report_fields | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| forensic_90_day_preservation_and_sla_clock | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| incident_reporting_determination | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
audit_dcaa_accounting_sf1408 Audit DCAA Pre-Award Accounting System (SF 1408) & Indirect Rate Pools ~564
Audit a contractor's chart of accounts, indirect cost pool structure (Fringe, Overhead, G&A, B&P/IR&D), timekeeping procedures, labor distribution policy, and general ledger setup against the 18-point DCAA Standard Form 1408 (SF 1408) Pre-Award Accounting System Checklist, FAR 16.301-3, FAR Subpart 31.2, and DFARS 252.242-7006, returning an SF 1408 executive readiness overview, a line-by-line SF 1408 checklist audit, an indirect rate pool and allocation base analysis, a FAR 31.205 unallowable cost segregation assessment (with FAR 52.242-3 penalty risk), labor timekeeping and DCAA floor-check controls, and a pre-award survey remediation roadmap. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon accounting and compliance audit call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `chart_of_accounts_and_pools_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `target_contract_type_and_solicitation` and `accounting_software_and_erp_stack` calibrate audit criteria across CPFF, CPIF, CPAF, T&M, and FFP contracts on Deltek Costpoint, Unanet, QuickBooks + GovCon timekeeping, or NetSuite). Use this tool when preparing for a DCAA SF 1408 Pre-Award Accounting System Survey, validating Fringe/Overhead/G&A pool-to-base causal/beneficial relationships, or segregating FAR 31.205 unallowable costs; use `generate_igce_price_to_win` instead to model proposal CLIN wrap-rate pricing and Price-to-Win sensitivity, or `extract_pricing_schedule` to parse Section B CLIN tables.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accounting_software_and_erp_stack | string | – | Current accounting ERP & timekeeping stack (e.g., Deltek Costpoint, Unanet GovCon, QuickBooks + ICAT/BigTime, NetSuite; defaults to 'QuickBooks_Online_With_GovCon_Timekeeping'). |
| chart_of_accounts_and_pools_text | string | yes | Contractor's chart of accounts, indirect cost pool structure (Fringe, Overhead, G&A, B&P/IR&D), timekeeping procedures, labor distribution policy, and general ledger setup (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| target_contract_type_and_solicitation | string | – | Target contract type (CPFF, CPIF, CPAF, T&M, FFP) and solicitation SF 1408 / FAR 16.301-3 adequacy requirements (defaults to 'Cost_Plus_Fixed_Fee_CPFF_And_T_And_M'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| far_31_205_unallowable_cost_segregation | object | – | Audit of FAR 31.205 expressly unallowable cost account segregation and FAR 52.242-3 penalty protection controls. |
| indirect_rate_pool_and_base_analysis | array | – | Indirect cost pool (Fringe, Overhead, G&A, B&P/IR&D) and allocation base audit under FAR 31.201-4 and CAS 418/410. |
| labor_timekeeping_and_floor_check_controls | object | – | Evaluation of daily labor timekeeping, supervisor approvals, Total Time Accounting (TTA), and DCAA floor-check readiness. |
| pre_award_survey_remediation_roadmap | array | – | Ordered pre-audit action items and artifact checklist to pass the DCAA SF 1408 Pre-Award Accounting System Survey. |
| sf1408_18_point_checklist | array | – | Line-by-line audit of Standard Form 1408 Section II accounting system adequacy criteria with findings and remediation steps. |
| sf1408_executive_overview | object | – | Executive DCAA SF 1408 readiness verdict, compliance score (0-100), cost-reimbursable award eligibility, and summary. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
audit_foci_dd254_clearance Audit DCSA Facility Clearance (FCL), DD Form 254 & FOCI Mitigation ~555
Audit DD Form 254 Contract Security Classification Specifications (Blocks 10, 11, 13), Standard Form 328 (SF 328 — Certificate Pertaining to Foreign Interests), and corporate cap-table / foreign investor structures against 32 CFR Part 117 (NISPOM) and Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) Facility Clearance (FCL) and Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI) mitigation standards, returning an FCL & FOCI executive overview, a DD Form 254 Block 10/11 safeguarding matrix (COMSEC, SCI, SIPRNet, CUI), an SF 328 foreign interest factor audit, a DCSA FOCI mitigation agreement blueprint (Board Resolution, SCA, SSA with NID, or Proxy/Voting Trust with ECP and TCP controls), and a Key Management Personnel (KMP) Exclusion Resolution & NISP eMASS checklist. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive industrial security audit call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `dd254_and_ownership_cap_table_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `target_facility_clearance_level` and `foreign_ownership_and_board_context` calibrate DCSA FCL safeguarding and 32 CFR 117.11 FOCI mitigation instruments). Use this tool when auditing DD Form 254 classified safeguarding requirements, SF 328 foreign ownership/LP triggers, or DCSA FCL / FOCI mitigation agreements; use `generate_ato_rmf_package` instead for DoD RMF / Continuous ATO (cATO) NIST 800-53 System Security Plans, or `match_key_personnel` for individual candidate security clearance and LCAT resume verification.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dd254_and_ownership_cap_table_text | string | yes | DD Form 254 Contract Security Classification Specification text (Blocks 10, 11, 13), SF 328 Certificate Pertaining to Foreign Interests entries, and corporate cap-table / foreign investor ownership s… |
| foreign_ownership_and_board_context | string | – | Summary of foreign equity voting/ownership percentages, foreign board seats, foreign debt, or foreign technology licensing ties under 32 CFR Part 117 (NISPOM; defaults to 'Minority_Foreign_LP_Or_Boar… |
| target_facility_clearance_level | string | – | Required Facility Clearance (FCL) and safeguarding posture (e.g., Confidential, Secret, Top Secret, TS/SCI, COMSEC, SIPRNet, JWICS; defaults to 'Top_Secret_FCL_With_SCI_And_SIPRNet'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dcsa_foci_mitigation_agreement_blueprint | object | – | Structured DCSA FOCI mitigation blueprint (Board Resolution, SCA, SSA, or Proxy/Voting Trust) with Outside Director, ECP, and TCP controls. |
| dd254_block10_and_11_safeguarding_matrix | array | – | Block-by-block audit of DD Form 254 Block 10, 11, and 13 classified access, safeguarding, COMSEC, SCI, and SIPRNet mandates under 32 CFR Part 117. |
| fcl_and_foci_executive_overview | object | – | High-level DCSA Facility Clearance (FCL) eligibility verdict, FOCI severity tier, and recommended mitigation instrument. |
| kmp_exclusion_resolution_and_nisp_emass_checklist | array | – | Step-by-step Key Management Personnel (KMP) List, Board Exclusion Resolution, DISS, and NISP eMASS submission checklist. |
| sf328_foreign_interest_factor_audit | array | – | Evaluation of Standard Form 328 (Certificate Pertaining to Foreign Interests) triggers across foreign equity, LP feeders, board seats, debt, and revenue. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
audit_govt_furnished_property_gfp Government-Furnished Property (GFP / FAR 52.245-1) & PIEE Property Management Plan ~522
Audit GFP/GFE/GFI attachments under FAR 52.245-1 and DFARS 252.245-7003/7005, generating a DCMA-ready Property Management System Plan (PMSP), PIEE GFP Module reporting workflow, and IUID marking checklist. Returns a strictly validated `GfpPropertyAuditResponse` JSON object containing `gfp_property_system_overview`, `far_52_245_1_ten_lifecycle_outcomes_audit`, `gfp_cap_line_item_and_iuid_registry_table`, and `piee_gfp_module_and_plant_clearance_workflow` grounded in FAR 52.245-1, DFARS 252.245-7003 (Contractor Property Management System Administration), DFARS 252.245-7005 (PIEE GFP Module), & MIL-STD-130N. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `gfp_attachment_and_property_clauses_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `dcma_property_system_audit_scope` and `liability_and_cap_regime` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing Government-Furnished Property (GFP / FAR 52.245-1) & PIEE Property Management Plan workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dcma_property_system_audit_scope | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'FAR_52_245_1_10_Lifecycle_Outcomes_DFARS_252_245_7005_PIEE_GFP_Module_And_MIL_STD_130_IUID'). |
| gfp_attachment_and_property_clauses_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for Government-Furnished Property (GFP / FAR 52.245-1) & PIEE Property Management Plan (15 to 45,000 c… |
| liability_and_cap_regime | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'FAR 52.245-1(h) Limited Risk of Loss (Government Self-Insures Except Willful Misconduct / Revoked PMSA)'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| far_52_245_1_ten_lifecycle_outcomes_audit | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| gfp_cap_line_item_and_iuid_registry_table | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| gfp_property_system_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| piee_gfp_module_and_plant_clearance_workflow | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
audit_itar_ear_export_control ITAR (22 CFR 120–130), EAR & Technology Control Plan (TCP) Export Compliance ~479
Classify defense/dual-use technical deliverables against USML Categories (ITAR) and CCL ECCNs (EAR), flags DFARS 252.225-7048 export obligations, and generates a facility Technology Control Plan (TCP). Returns a strictly validated `ItarEarExportResponse` JSON object containing `export_jurisdiction_overview`, `usml_and_eccn_classification_matrix`, `technology_control_plan_tcp_controls`, and `deemed_export_and_ddtc_bis_licensing` grounded in 22 CFR Parts 120–130 (ITAR USML Categories IV & XI), 15 CFR Parts 730–774 (EAR CCL), & DFARS 252.225-7048. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `technical_deliverables_and_rfp_export_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `target_export_regime` and `foreign_national_and_oconus_context` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing ITAR (22 CFR 120–130), EAR & Technology Control Plan (TCP) Export Compliance workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| foreign_national_and_oconus_context | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'U.S. Persons Only on ITAR USML Technical Data; Evaluate Deemed Export Rule (22 CFR 120.50 / 15 CFR 734.13)'). |
| target_export_regime | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'ITAR_22_CFR_120_130_And_EAR_15_CFR_730_774_Dual_Audit'). |
| technical_deliverables_and_rfp_export_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for ITAR (22 CFR 120–130), EAR & Technology Control Plan (TCP) Export Compliance (15 to 45,000 charact… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| deemed_export_and_ddtc_bis_licensing | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| export_jurisdiction_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| technology_control_plan_tcp_controls | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| usml_and_eccn_classification_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
No examples provided.
audit_organizational_ethics_far_52_203_13 FAR 52.203-13 Business Ethics, Procurement Integrity Act & OIG Mandatory Disclosure ~542
Audit compliance incidents, overpayments, and hiring of former government officials against FAR 52.203-13 (Mandatory Disclosure Rule), False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729), and Procurement Integrity Act (FAR 3.104), generating an Internal Control System & Post-Government Employment opinion. Returns a strictly validated `EthicsMandatoryDisclosureResponse` JSON object containing `credible_evidence_and_ethics_overview`, `far_52_203_13_and_pia_trigger_audit_matrix`, `oig_disclosure_submission_and_pge_wall_memos`, and `far_9_4_present_responsibility_and_internal_controls` grounded in FAR 52.203-13 (Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act), FAR 3.104 (41 U.S.C. § 2101–2107 PIA), & 18 U.S.C. § 207. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `compliance_incident_or_former_official_hiring_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `audit_focus_regime` and `contract_value_and_performance_duration` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing FAR 52.203-13 Business Ethics, Procurement Integrity Act & OIG Mandatory Disclosure workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| audit_focus_regime | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'FAR_52_203_13_Credible_Evidence_OIG_Disclosure_FAR_3_104_PIA_And_18_USC_207_Revolving_Door'). |
| compliance_incident_or_former_official_hiring_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for FAR 52.203-13 Business Ethics, Procurement Integrity Act & OIG Mandatory Disclosure (15 to 45,000… |
| contract_value_and_performance_duration | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Active Contract > $6.0M Threshold and > 120 Days Performance (Full FAR 52.203-13(c) Internal Control System… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| credible_evidence_and_ethics_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| far_52_203_13_and_pia_trigger_audit_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| far_9_4_present_responsibility_and_internal_controls | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| oig_disclosure_submission_and_pge_wall_memos | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
audit_section_508_vpat Audit Revised Section 508, WCAG 2.2 AA & Generate VPAT 2.5 Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) ~530
Audit software, cloud SaaS portals, and electronic deliverables against Revised Section 508 (36 CFR Part 1194 / FAR Subpart 58.2), W3C WCAG 2.1 / 2.2 Level A & AA Success Criteria, and State SLED digital accessibility laws (such as Colorado HB21-1110) to generate an Accessibility Readiness Score (0-100), a structured ITI VPAT 2.5 Conformance Matrix (WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA + Revised Section 508 Chapters 3, 5, and 6), an Engineering Accessibility Remediation POA&M Roadmap, and a paste-ready VPAT 2.5 ACR & Equally Effective Alternate Access Plan (EEAAP) proposal narrative. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive accessibility compliance generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `product_architecture_and_ui_specs` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters and `known_accessibility_test_results_or_gaps` accepts 10 to 35,000 characters). Use this tool when auditing software/SaaS accessibility or generating a Section 508 VPAT 2.5 ACR table for federal/SLED proposals; use `answer_security_questionnaire` instead for cybersecurity/SOC 2/NIST 800-171 questionnaires, or `scan_far_dfars_clauses` for general Section I FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| known_accessibility_test_results_or_gaps | string | – | Known accessibility test findings (axe-core, Lighthouse, DHS Trusted Tester v5, JAWS/NVDA/VoiceOver), existing exceptions (e.g., third-party GIS map canvas or legacy PDF exports), and current remedia… |
| product_architecture_and_ui_specs | string | yes | Description of the software/SaaS application, UI framework (React/Angular/USWDS), electronic documents, user workflows, and target RFP Section 508 / accessibility solicitation clauses (20 to 45,000 c… |
| target_compliance_standard | string | – | Target accessibility regulatory regime ('Revised_Section_508_And_WCAG_2_2_AA' [default], 'Federal_Section_508_36_CFR_1194_Only', 'State_SLED_Accessibility_HB21_1110_And_WCAG_2_2_AA', or 'DoD_DISA_Sec… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accessibility_readiness_score | integer | – | 0-100 score quantifying the product's Section 508 / WCAG 2.2 AA compliance readiness and VPAT 2.5 defensibility for federal/state procurement. |
| engineering_remediation_roadmap | array | – | Prioritized Accessibility Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) and engineering remediation roadmap for any 'Partially_Supports' or 'Does_Not_Support' items. |
| executive_vpat_summary | string | – | Executive accessibility compliance summary for the Agency Section 508 Coordinator and Contracting Officer. |
| overall_section_508_determination | string | – | Overall Section 508 / WCAG 2.2 AA procurement conformance determination under FAR 58.2 and ITI VPAT 2.5 standards. |
| ready_to_submit_vpat_2_5_acr_narrative | string | – | Complete, paste-ready ITI VPAT 2.5 Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) & FAR 58.2 Proposal Volume narrative including evaluation methodology (DHS Trusted Tester v5, axe-core, NVDA/JAWS) and Equall… |
| vpat_2_5_conformance_matrix | array | – | Structured ITI VPAT 2.5 Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) audit rows covering WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA and Revised Section 508 Chapters 3, 5, and 6. |
No examples provided.
audit_service_contract_act_wage Map RFP LCATs to DOL SCA Wage Determinations & Audit Fringe / FAR 52.222-43 Compliance ~549
Map solicitation labor categories (LCATs) to Department of Labor (DOL) SAM.gov Service Contract Act (SCA / FAR 52.222-41) Directory of Occupations 5-digit codes and Davis-Bacon Act classifications, audit FLSA 29 CFR Part 541 exempt vs. non-exempt status, compute mandatory Health & Welfare (H&W) fringe obligations (Standard vs. EO 13706 Paid Sick Leave), Vacation (including EO 14055 predecessor seniority credit), and 11 Federal Holidays hourly loads, and generate an SF 1444 conformance and FAR 52.222-43 Option Year price adjustment compliance narrative. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive labor compliance and pricing audit call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `rfp_labor_categories_and_locality_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `wage_determination_and_fringe_mode` and `audit_objective` calibrate H&W rates, holiday counts, and FAR 52.222-43 zero-escalation rules). Use this tool when mapping RFP labor categories to DOL SCA Wage Determinations, calculating H&W and vacation fringe floors, or preparing SF 1444 conformance requests; use `generate_igce_price_to_win` instead for full multi-year CLIN wrap-rate and Price-to-Win modeling, or `match_key_personnel` to evaluate candidate resumes against LCAT education/experience requirements.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| audit_objective | string | – | Audit objective: DOL 5-digit Occupation Code mapping, FLSA 29 CFR 541 exemption check, H&W/Vacation/Holiday build-up, SF 1444 conformance check, and FAR 52.222-43 price adjustment baseline (defaults… |
| rfp_labor_categories_and_locality_text | string | yes | Solicitation labor categories (LCATs), job duties, proposed base hourly rates, place of performance county/MSA, and applicable DOL Wage Determination or CBA details (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| wage_determination_and_fringe_mode | string | – | Wage determination and fringe calculation mode (Standard H&W vs. EO 13706 Paid Sick Leave H&W, 11 Federal Holidays including Juneteenth, and predecessor seniority vacation accrual; defaults to 'SAM_D… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cost_volume_boe_sca_narrative_template | string | – | Paste-ready Cost Volume Narrative warranting SCA compliance, zero Option Year SCA escalation contingency per FAR 52.222-43, and bona fide fringe benefit plan administration. |
| far_52_222_43_price_adjustment_and_sf1444_plan | object | – | FAR 52.222-43 Option Year price adjustment protection rules, SF 1444 conformance playbook, and incumbent seniority vacation audit. |
| sca_labor_category_mappings | array | – | LCAT-by-LCAT mapping to DOL SCA Directory of Occupations codes, FLSA exemption audit, and total minimum hourly cost floor. |
| sca_wage_compliance_overview | object | – | High-level SCA/DBA statutory compliance overview, locality Wage Determination profile, and H&W fringe rate. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
audit_supply_chain_scrm Audit Supply Chain Risk (NIST 800-161 C-SCRM, NDAA 889, FASCSA, TAA, BAA) & Generate SBOM Attestation ~979
Audit hardware Bills of Materials (BOMs), sub-tier suppliers, and software components (SBOM) against NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM), FAR 52.204-25 (NDAA Section 889 Part A/B prohibition on Huawei, ZTE, Hytera, Hikvision, Dahua and their affiliates), FAR 52.204-30 (FASCSA exclusion orders), the Buy American Act (FAR Part 25 domestic content), and the Trade Agreements Act (FAR 52.225-5 designated countries), returning JSON with a Supply Chain Risk Score (0-100), an overall SCRM verdict, per-line NDAA 889 and TAA determinations, a BAA domestic-content percentage, NIST 800-161 SR-family control gaps, an NTIA minimum-elements SBOM and CISA Secure Software Self-Attestation readiness review, paste-ready C-SCRM Plan sections, a SCRM POA&M remediation roadmap, and a proposal-ready SCRM narrative. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive compliance auditor (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; nothing is stored, filed, or submitted to SAM.gov, and FASCSA results must still be verified in SAM.gov; `solicitation_or_contract_context` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, `bom_line_items` accepts 1 to 200 lines, and `software_components` accepts up to 500 SBOM components). Use this tool when vetting a BOM, reseller quote, or SBOM for NDAA 889 / FASCSA / TAA / BAA award eligibility or drafting a C-SCRM Plan and SBOM attestation; use `audit_section_508_vpat` instead for Section 508 / WCAG 2.2 accessibility and VPAT conformance, `scan_far_dfars_clauses` for general Section I FAR/DFARS clause flow-down risk scanning, `answer_security_questionnaire` for SOC 2 / FedRAMP / NIST 800-171 questionnaires, or `generate_ato_rmf_package` for NIST 800-53 SSP / RMF / cATO authorization packages.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| additional_supplier_notes | string | – | Optional sub-tier supplier attestations, SAM.gov FAR 52.204-24/26 representations, ownership/affiliation notes, or existing C-SCRM program documentation (0 to 20,000 characters). |
| applicable_contract_clauses | array | – | Supply chain clauses and standards in the solicitation, e.g. 'FAR 52.204-25', 'FAR 52.204-30', 'FAR 52.225-5', 'DFARS 252.225-7001', 'DFARS 252.204-7012', 'DFARS 252.246-7008', 'NIST SP 800-161 Rev.… |
| bom_line_items | array | yes | Hardware / COTS Bill of Materials line items to screen (1 to 200 lines). |
| contracting_agency | string | – | Contracting agency or SLED buyer, e.g. 'U.S. Army PEO C3T', 'GSA FAS', or 'Arizona ADOA-ASET' (2 to 300 characters). |
| offeror_name | string | – | Legal name of the prime offeror / reseller submitting the BOM and supply chain representations (2 to 300 characters). |
| sbom_format | string | – | Format of the offeror's SBOM deliverable: 'CycloneDX_1_6' (default), 'SPDX_2_3', 'SPDX_3_0', 'Proprietary_Or_Spreadsheet', or 'None_Available'. |
| software_components | array | – | Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) components for NTIA minimum-elements and CISA secure software attestation review (0 to 500 components). |
| solicitation_or_contract_context | string | yes | Solicitation / contract scope, Section H/I supply chain clauses, delivery location, end-use, and any agency C-SCRM, NDAA 889, TAA, BAA, or SBOM requirements (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| target_compliance_regime | string | – | Target supply chain regulatory regime: 'Auto_Detect_From_Clauses' (default), 'Federal_DoD_Full_C_SCRM_NDAA_889_TAA_BAA', 'Federal_Civilian_FASCSA_And_CISA_Secure_Software', or 'State_SLED_Prohibited_… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| baa_domestic_content | object | – | Buy American Act (FAR Part 25) domestic content analysis. |
| c_scrm_plan_sections | array | – | Paste-ready Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) Plan sections aligned to NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1. |
| executive_scrm_summary | string | – | Executive supply chain risk summary for the Contracting Officer and offeror leadership. |
| fascsa_exclusion_check | object | – | FAR 52.204-30 FASCSA exclusion/removal order screening. |
| ndaa_889_findings | array | – | Per-line FAR 52.204-25 (NDAA Section 889 Part A/B) prohibited-vendor screening findings. |
| nist_800_161_control_gaps | array | – | NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 C-SCRM control gaps with severity and implementation guidance. |
| overall_scrm_verdict | string | – | Overall C-SCRM / NDAA 889 / FASCSA / TAA / BAA award-eligibility verdict. |
| ready_to_submit_scrm_narrative | string | – | Paste-ready proposal Supply Chain Risk Management volume narrative with NDAA 889 / FASCSA representations, TAA/BAA certification language, and SBOM attestation statement. |
| remediation_roadmap | array | – | Prioritized SCRM Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) remediation roadmap. |
| sbom_attestation | object | – | NTIA SBOM minimum-elements review and CISA Secure Software Self-Attestation readiness. |
| supply_chain_risk_score | integer | – | Quantitative supply chain risk score from 0 (no material risk) to 100 (prohibited / award-blocking). |
| taa_compliance_by_line | array | – | Per-line Trade Agreements Act (FAR 52.225-5) designated-country determinations. |
No examples provided.
classify_naics_psc_nigp Classify NAICS, SIC, Federal PSC & State NIGP/UNSPSC Codes ~330
Map any company profile, product description, or Statement of Work (SOW) into ranked 6-digit NAICS codes (with official SBA Small Business Size Standards in revenue or headcount), 4-digit SIC codes, 4-character Federal PSC codes, and State NIGP/UNSPSC commodity codes. This is a read-only, stateless taxonomy classification call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `description_text` is required, `context_type` tunes code selection for vendor KYB profiles vs. RFP scopes, and `max_secondary_codes` [1-5, default 3] controls how many secondary NAICS/PSC alternatives are returned alongside the primary code). Use this tool whenever you need industry, procurement, or KYB taxonomy codes and SBA small-business size caps; use `search_historical_awards` instead to query past contract awards once you have a NAICS code, or `parse_b2b_contract` to extract contract dates and dollar values.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| context_type | string | – | Classification context: 'company_or_vendor_profile', 'rfp_or_sow_scope', or 'product_or_line_item'. |
| description_text | string | yes | Unstructured text describing a company's offerings, a B2B product catalog, or a government RFP/SOW technical scope (20 to 50,000 characters). |
| max_secondary_codes | integer | – | Maximum number of secondary/alternative NAICS, PSC, and NIGP codes to return in addition to the top-ranked primary code (integer 1 to 5; defaults to 3). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_or_offering_summary | string | – | Concise 1-sentence executive summary of the company, SOW, or product analyzed. |
| federal_psc_codes | array | – | 4-character Federal Product Service Codes (PSC) for SAM.gov saved searches and FPDS award tracking. |
| kyb_and_procurement_notes | string | – | Actionable guidance covering SAM.gov NAICS/PSC profile setup, SBA small-business size standard nuances (e.g., 150-employee IT Value Added Reseller footnote under 541519), SLED NIGP registration, and… |
| primary_industry_sector | string | – | 2-digit NAICS sector code and name (e.g., '54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services'). |
| primary_naics | object | – | Highest-confidence primary 6-digit NAICS code and SBA Small Business Size Standard. |
| secondary_naics_codes | array | – | Additional relevant 6-digit NAICS codes for SAM.gov registration and secondary capabilities. |
| sic_codes | array | – | 4-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for FinTech KYB, banking underwriting, and corporate filings. |
| state_unspsc_and_nigp_codes | array | – | 8-digit UNSPSC and 5-digit NIGP Class-Item codes for State/Municipal SLED vendor portals and ERP catalogs. |
No examples provided.
extract_pricing_schedule Extract Section B CLIN Pricing Tables, Quotes & Labor Rate Cards ~327
Extract multi-tier CLIN/SLIN pricing schedules, GSA/T&M labor rate cards, vendor quotes, and Bill of Materials (BOM) tables from unstructured text into normalized JSON with automated line-item math auditing. This is a read-only, stateless extraction call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `document_text` accepts 20 to 100,000 characters, `expected_document_type` optionally hints the table schema, and `audit_math_and_anomalies` [default true] verifies `quantity * unit_price == extended_price` and flags arithmetic discrepancies). Use this tool when parsing pricing tables, CLIN schedules, invoices, or labor rate cards; use `parse_b2b_contract` instead for general contract dates/parties/deliverables, or `search_historical_awards` to look up historical government award prices.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| audit_math_and_anomalies | boolean | – | When true (default), cross-checks each line item (`quantity * unit_price == total_price`) and subtotal summation, returning any arithmetic mismatches in `math_discrepancies`. |
| document_text | string | yes | Raw text or copied table content from a Federal Section B CLIN schedule, T&M labor rate card, B2B vendor quote, BOM, or invoice (20 to 100,000 characters). |
| expected_document_type | string | – | Primary document type hint: 'federal_section_b_clin_schedule', 'vendor_quote', 'commercial_invoice', 'labor_rate_card_tm', 'bill_of_materials_bom', or 'purchase_order'. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| base_period_total_usd | number | – | Sum of all Base Period / Year 1 / Initial Term line items in USD. |
| currency_code | string | – | ISO 4217 3-letter currency code (defaults to 'USD'). |
| customer_or_agency_name | string|null | – | Buyer organization, government agency, or bill-to entity if present in the text. |
| detected_document_type | string | – | Classified pricing document type. |
| document_title_or_reference | string | – | Extracted solicitation number, quote ID, invoice number, or contract title. |
| dominant_pricing_model | string | – | Overall contract pricing structure (e.g., 'HYBRID_MIXED', 'FIRM_FIXED_PRICE_FFP', 'TIME_AND_MATERIALS_TM'). |
| finops_and_price_to_win_summary | string | – | Executive FinOps & Price-to-Win (PTW) analysis summarizing blended labor rates, annual escalation percentages, discount depth, and negotiation leverage. |
| line_items | array | – | Normalized array of all extracted CLINs, SLINs, labor rate rows, and BOM SKUs. |
| math_and_pricing_anomalies | array | – | Arithmetic discrepancies (Quantity * Unit Price != Stated Total), missing NTE ceilings, or escalation anomalies. |
| options_total_usd | number | – | Sum of all Option Year / Renewal Tier line items in USD (0.0 if no option periods exist). |
| payment_terms_and_invoicing_rules | array | – | Extracted payment terms (e.g., 'Net 30', 'WAWF/IPP electronic invoicing', 'Milestone billing schedule', 'Annual upfront'). |
| period_subtotals | array | – | Subtotal breakdown grouped by contract performance period or billing tier. |
| total_evaluated_contract_value_usd | number | – | Grand total contract ceiling or quote value across Base + All Option Periods in USD. |
| vendor_or_issuer_name | string|null | – | Vendor, prime contractor, or quote issuer name if present in the text. |
No examples provided.
generate_ai_governance_nist_ai_rmf_omb_m24 Federal AI Governance, OMB M-24-10/M-24-18 & NIST AI RMF 1.0 Compliance Package ~584
Evaluate AI/ML/LLM solutions proposed for federal and SLED agencies against OMB Memoranda M-24-10 & M-24-18, NIST AI RMF 1.0 (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage), and DoD Responsible AI (RAI) Toolkit, outputting a Safety-Impact Classification & Model Card. Returns a strictly validated `AiGovernanceOmbResponse` JSON object containing `omb_safety_and_rights_impact_overview`, `nist_ai_rmf_govern_map_measure_manage_matrix`, `omb_m_24_10_and_m_24_18_minimum_practices_audit`, and `federal_ai_system_card_and_hitl_safeguards` grounded in OMB Memorandum M-24-10, OMB Memorandum M-24-18 (Advancing the Responsible Acquisition of AI in Government), NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF 1.0), NIST AI 600-1, & DoD CDAO RAI Shield. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `proposed_ai_system_and_agency_use_case_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `target_ai_governance_frameworks` and `deployment_enclave_and_training_data_policy` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing Federal AI Governance, OMB M-24-10/M-24-18 & NIST AI RMF 1.0 Compliance Package workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| deployment_enclave_and_training_data_policy | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Stateless RAG on Agency Tenant (Zero Training on Government CUI/PII; Open-Format Export to Prevent Vendor Lo… |
| proposed_ai_system_and_agency_use_case_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for Federal AI Governance, OMB M-24-10/M-24-18 & NIST AI RMF 1.0 Compliance Package (15 to 45,000 char… |
| target_ai_governance_frameworks | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'OMB_M_24_10_OMB_M_24_18_NIST_AI_RMF_1_0_NIST_AI_600_1_GenAI_And_DoD_CDAO_RAI_Toolkit'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| federal_ai_system_card_and_hitl_safeguards | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| nist_ai_rmf_govern_map_measure_manage_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| omb_m_24_10_and_m_24_18_minimum_practices_audit | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| omb_safety_and_rights_impact_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_ato_rmf_package Generate GovCon RMF, Continuous ATO (cATO), SSP & POA&M Package ~486
Transform RFP cybersecurity clauses, system architecture descriptions, and cloud hosting baselines into a NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 / DoDI 8510.01 RMF / FedRAMP / StateRAMP Authority to Operate (ATO & Continuous ATO) package with FIPS 199 / CNSSI 1253 security categorization, System Security Plan (SSP) control inheritance matrices, eMASS/CSAM-ready Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) schedules, Continuous Monitoring (ConMon) DevSecOps blueprints, and Shipley proposal narratives. This is a read-only, stateless generative authorization modeling call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `system_architecture_and_rfp_cyber_text` accepts 40 to 100,000 characters, `cloud_hosting_and_inherited_controls_context` accepts 20 to 80,000 characters, and `target_authorization_framework` and `target_impact_level` calibrate control baselines across DoD RMF IL2-IL6, FedRAMP, StateRAMP, and CMMC 2.0). Use this tool when building System Security Plans (SSPs), eMASS POA&M items, FIPS 199 categorizations, or cATO roadmaps for an ATO boundary; use `answer_security_questionnaire` instead to answer vendor security questionnaires and calculate a numeric DoD SPRS score (-203 to 110), or `scan_far_dfars_clauses` to audit FAR/DFARS solicitation clauses.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| rfp_security_and_ato_requirements | string | yes | Raw text from RFP Section C/H/L/M detailing ATO, RMF (eMASS/Xacta), FedRAMP, StateRAMP, DISA Impact Level (IL4/IL5), NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, or CMMC Level 2 authorization requirements. |
| system_architecture_and_boundary_context | string | yes | Description of the bidder's cloud environment, hosting boundary, identity provider, encryption posture, DevSecOps toolchain, and any existing compliance gaps. |
| target_ato_timeline_days | integer | – | Target calendar days from contract award to achieve full ATO / cATO authorization. |
| target_authorization_framework | string | – | Target government cybersecurity authorization framework. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ato_readiness_score | integer | – | Overall ATO / cATO readiness score from 0 to 100 based on boundary maturity, control coverage, and open findings. |
| authorization_boundary_summary | object | – | FIPS 199 categorization, Impact Level baseline, GRC system of record, CSP control inheritance percentage, and boundary summary. |
| cato_devsecops_pipeline_blueprint | object | – | Continuous ATO (cATO) DevSecOps CI/CD security gates, ConMon cadence, and OSCAL/SBOM automation blueprint. |
| poam_remediation_schedule | array | – | Structured Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) remediation table for any open findings or architecture gaps. |
| proposal_technical_volume_ato_narrative | string | – | Executive-ready Shipley Technical Volume narrative explaining how the Offeror will achieve rapid, low-risk ATO / cATO without delaying mission deployment. |
| rmf_six_step_milestone_plan | array | – | Day-by-day RMF Step 1 through Step 6 schedule to achieve IATT and full ATO within target_ato_timeline_days. |
| ssp_control_implementations | array | – | Audit-ready NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 / NIST 800-171 System Security Plan (SSP) control implementation narratives. |
No examples provided.
generate_award_fee_plan_incentive_maximizer FAR Subpart 16.4 Award-Fee (CPAF) & Incentive-Fee (CPIF / FPIF) Evaluation Maximizer ~555
Model CPAF, CPIF, and FPIF share-ratio curves (overrun/underrun ceiling geometry under FAR 16.401) and transforms periodic performance metrics into an Award-Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB) self-assessment presentation to maximize unearned/rollover fee pools. Returns a strictly validated `CpafCpifAwardFeeResponse` JSON object containing `award_and_incentive_fee_geometry_overview`, `cpif_fpif_share_ratio_and_pta_sensitivity_table`, `afeb_table_16_1_self_assessment_briefing_sections`, and `far_16_401_e_4_rollover_rules_and_afdo_strategy` grounded in FAR Subpart 16.4 (Incentive Contracts), FAR 16.401(e)(3) Table 16-1 (Standard Award-Fee Adjectival Ratings), FAR 16.401(e)(4) (Rollover Prohibition), & DFARS 216.405-2. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `incentive_or_award_fee_plan_and_period_metrics_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `contract_fee_structure_type` and `evaluation_period_and_pool_context` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing FAR Subpart 16.4 Award-Fee (CPAF) & Incentive-Fee (CPIF / FPIF) Evaluation Maximizer workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_fee_structure_type | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'Combined_CPAF_Award_Fee_Adjectival_Table_16_1_And_CPIF_FPIF_Share_Ratio_PTA_Geometry'). |
| evaluation_period_and_pool_context | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Award-Fee Period 04 (6-Month Evaluation Pool: $1,250,000 Available Award Fee + Base Fee 2.0%)'). |
| incentive_or_award_fee_plan_and_period_metrics_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for FAR Subpart 16.4 Award-Fee (CPAF) & Incentive-Fee (CPIF / FPIF) Evaluation Maximizer (15 to 45,000… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| afeb_table_16_1_self_assessment_briefing_sections | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| award_and_incentive_fee_geometry_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| cpif_fpif_share_ratio_and_pta_sensitivity_table | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| far_16_401_e_4_rollover_rules_and_afdo_strategy | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_capture_black_hat_review Generate GovCon Black-Hat Competitive Review & Ethical Ghosting Statements ~478
Conduct a Shipley Black-Hat competitive intelligence simulation on a target solicitation and incumbent contractor, returning a Black-Hat executive assessment with unseating probability (0-100%), simulated competitor Black-Hat profiles (predicted bid strategy, pricing/wrap-rate posture, exploitable vulnerabilities, and counter-strategies), paste-ready Shipley ethical ghosting statements mapped to RFP Section L/M evaluation factors, an incumbent recompete vulnerability matrix (transition risk neutralizer, technical debt exposure, PTW wrap-rate wedge, and Contracting Officer shaping questions), and Red Team evaluator scoring triggers. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive capture intelligence generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `solicitation_and_incumbent_context_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `bidder_discriminators_and_proof_points` and `evaluation_type_and_posture` tailor ghosting prose across Best-Value Tradeoff and LPTA competitions). Use this tool when running a pre-RFP or pre-proposal Black-Hat competitive review to expose incumbent weaknesses and draft Shipley ethical ghosting language; use `match_capability_statement` instead for an initial Gate-1 Bid/No-Bid Pwin score, or `generate_igce_price_to_win` for quantitative LCAT and wrap-rate sensitivity modeling.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bidder_discriminators_and_proof_points | string | – | Bidder's technical discriminators, proprietary accelerators, past performance metrics, socio-economic status, and wrap-rate / PTW advantages (defaults to 'Cleared_Automation_First_Team_With_Zero_Trus… |
| evaluation_type_and_posture | string | – | Capture posture and source selection method (e.g., Challenger Unseating Incumbent under Best-Value Tradeoff, Incumbent Defending Recompete, or LPTA; defaults to 'Challenger_Unseating_Incumbent_Best_V… |
| solicitation_and_incumbent_context_text | string | yes | Target RFP scope, Section M evaluation weights, incumbent contractor name/PIID, historical award ceiling, known incumbent pain points (SLA misses, turnover, legacy tech debt), and likely competitor b… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| black_hat_executive_assessment | object | – | High-level Black-Hat competitive intelligence summary, unseating probability, and primary win strategy. |
| competitor_black_hat_profiles | array | – | Simulated Black-Hat profiles for the incumbent and top challenger archetypes with exploitable vulnerabilities and counter-strategies. |
| incumbent_recompete_vulnerability_matrix | object | – | Tactical playbook neutralizing incumbent transition advantages, exposing technical debt, and shaping Q&A amendments. |
| red_team_evaluator_scoring_triggers | array | – | Concrete proof points and callout boxes designed to earn formal SSEB 'Significant Strengths' under FAR 15.305. |
| shipley_ethical_ghosting_statements | array | – | Paste-ready Shipley ethical ghosting statements mapped to RFP Section L/M evaluation factors. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_cdrls_did_data_deliverables DoD CDRL (DD Form 1423) & Data Item Description (DID) Schedule Extractor ~497
Extract all Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL / DD Form 1423) items from DoD RFPs, maps Data Item Descriptions (DIDs), Block 4 authority, submission frequencies, inspection/acceptance codes, and builds a WBS Data Delivery Calendar. Returns a strictly validated `CdrlDd1423Response` JSON object containing `cdrl_schedule_overview`, `dd_form_1423_extracted_items`, `did_tailoring_and_delivery_calendar`, and `piee_wawf_and_block18_pricing_governance` grounded in DFARS Subpart 227.71, DoD 5010.12-M (Procedures for the Acquisition and Management of Technical Data), & ASSIST DID Registry. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `rfp_exhibit_a_cdrl_and_pws_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `contract_award_and_pop_start_context` and `dd1423_pricing_group_strategy` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing DoD CDRL (DD Form 1423) & Data Item Description (DID) Schedule Extractor workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_award_and_pop_start_context | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'Contract Award / Post-Award Conference (PAC) = Day 0; 12-Month Base Period + 4 Option Years'). |
| dd1423_pricing_group_strategy | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Map DD Form 1423 Block 18 Price Groups (Group I, II, III, IV — NSP vs. Separately Priced Data CLIN)'). |
| rfp_exhibit_a_cdrl_and_pws_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for DoD CDRL (DD Form 1423) & Data Item Description (DID) Schedule Extractor (15 to 45,000 characters). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cdrl_schedule_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| dd_form_1423_extracted_items | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| did_tailoring_and_delivery_calendar | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| piee_wawf_and_block18_pricing_governance | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_compliance_matrix Generate Shipley RFP Compliance Matrix & Proposal Outline ~298
Shred unstructured RFP Section C (SOW/PWS), Section L (Instructions), and Section M (Evaluation Criteria) text into a numbered `shall`/`must` Requirements Traceability Matrix, Section L-to-M cross-reference map, and annotated Proposal Outline with page allocations. This is a read-only, stateless analysis operation (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `raw_text` accepts 50 to 100,000 characters, and `proposal_methodology` selects 'shipley' [default Volume I-IV structure], 'federal_far' [FAR 15.3], or 'standard_b2b' outline conventions). Use this tool when shredding a base RFP into a compliance checklist and proposal outline; use `analyze_rfp_amendment_diff` instead when comparing an SF-30 amendment against a base RFP, or `generate_rfp_response` to draft the actual prose narrative for a specific section.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| proposal_methodology | string | – | Proposal structuring methodology: 'shipley' (Shipley Associates capture standard), 'standard_b2b' (commercial enterprise RFP), or 'federal_far' (strict FAR Section L/M mapping). |
| raw_text | string | yes | Raw RFP Section C (Statement of Work / PWS), Section L (Instructions to Offerors), and/or Section M (Evaluation Factors) text (50 to 100,000 characters). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| evaluation_criteria_weights | array | – | Extracted Section M or commercial evaluation scoring factors and relative weights. |
| proposal_methodology | string | – | Echoed proposal methodology applied ('shipley', 'standard_b2b', or 'federal_far'). |
| proposal_outline | array | – | Structured section-by-section proposal outline with mapped requirements, win themes, and page budgets. |
| requirements_matrix | array | – | Ordered list of shredded RFP requirements mapped to proposal sections and required verification evidence. |
| solicitation_title | string | – | Inferred or stated title/scope of the RFP or Statement of Work. |
| submission_format_rules | array | – | Extracted administrative formatting, page limit, font, margin, or submission instructions that could trigger rejection if violated. |
| total_mandatory_shall_count | integer | – | Total count of mandatory ('MANDATORY_SHALL') requirements identified in the text. |
No examples provided.
generate_cost_accounting_cas_ds2 Audit CAS Coverage (Modified vs. Full CAS) & Draft CASB Form DS-1 Disclosure Sections ~549
Determine Cost Accounting Standards (CAS / 48 CFR Chapter 99) exemptions vs. Modified CAS ($2M trigger contract / < $50M net CAS-covered awards) vs. Full CAS (>= $50M net CAS-covered awards or single award >= $50M) under FAR 52.230-1 through 52.230-6, audit contractor cost accounting practices against CAS 401, CAS 402, CAS 405, CAS 406, CAS 410 (Total Cost Input vs. Value-Added G&A base), and CAS 418, and generate paste-ready CASB Form DS-1 Disclosure Statement Continuation Sheet narratives across Parts I, II, III, IV, and VII plus FAR 52.230-6 General Dollar Magnitude (GDM) cost-impact governance rules. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon cost accounting compliance and disclosure generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `contractor_accounting_and_awards_profile` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `target_cas_coverage_and_ds_form` and `g_and_a_allocation_base_preference` calibrate Modified vs. Full CAS audits and CAS 410 G&A base distortion checks). Use this tool when determining FAR Part 30 CAS coverage tiers, auditing CAS 401-420 compliance, or drafting a CASB Form DS-1 Disclosure Statement; use `audit_dcaa_accounting_sf1408` instead for pre-award Standard Form 1408 accounting system surveys, or `generate_igce_price_to_win` for proposal LCAT wrap-rate pricing.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contractor_accounting_and_awards_profile | string | yes | Contractor business size status, prior/current year net CAS-covered awards, contract types, direct vs. indirect charging rules, Fringe/Overhead/G&A pool structures, and pass-through subcontract volum… |
| g_and_a_allocation_base_preference | string | – | CAS 410 G&A allocation base preference (Total Cost Input [TCI], Value-Added Cost Input excluding direct material/subcontracts, or Single Element Cost Input; defaults to 'Evaluate_Total_Cost_Input_TCI… |
| target_cas_coverage_and_ds_form | string | – | Target CAS coverage evaluation and disclosure form (CAS Exemption Audit, Modified CAS 401/402/405/406, Full CAS 19 Standards, or CASB DS-1 / DS-2 Disclosure Statement preparation; defaults to 'Full_C… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cas_applicability_and_coverage_determination | object | – | 48 CFR 9903 CAS exemption vs. Modified CAS vs. Full CAS determination and FAR 52.230 clause mapping. |
| casb_ds1_disclosure_statement_sections | array | – | Paste-ready CASB Form DS-1 Disclosure Statement Continuation Sheet narratives across Parts I, II, III, IV, and VII. |
| core_cas_standards_compliance_audit | array | – | Audit of CAS 401, CAS 402, CAS 405, CAS 406, CAS 410, and CAS 418 compliance against DCAA CAM Chapter 8. |
| far_52_230_6_cost_impact_and_change_governance | object | – | FAR 52.230-6 60-day CFAO advance notice rules and General Dollar Magnitude (GDM) cost-impact governance. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_cpars_past_performance Generate Shipley Volume III Past Performance & CPARS Citations ~366
Transform unstructured project histories, prior contract summaries, and CPARS excerpts into Shipley Section L/M Past Performance Volume III citations with predicted DoD Source Selection Relevance ('Very Relevant' to 'Not Relevant') and Performance Confidence ratings, Scope/Magnitude/Complexity matrices, FAR 42.1503 5-Factor CPARS narratives, and Context-Challenge-Action-Result (CCAR) blocks. This is a read-only, stateless generative evaluation call where relevance/confidence ratings are model-inferred against Section M criteria (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `rfp_section_l_m_requirements` and `project_history_text` accept up to 100,000 characters, and optional `bidder_role_and_context` calibrates Prime vs. Subcontractor/JV attribution and page budgets). Use this tool when building Volume III Past Performance contract citations and CPARS questionnaires; use `generate_rfp_response` instead for Volume I Technical Approach prose, or `match_key_personnel` for individual staff resumes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bidder_role_and_context | string | – | Optional pursuit context specifying Prime vs. Subcontractor citation mix, Joint Venture / SBA Mentor-Protege structure (13 CFR 125.8), or Volume III page-limit constraints. |
| project_history_text | string | yes | Unstructured prior contract summaries, internal project delivery notes, or official CPARS evaluation excerpts (contract numbers, agencies, dollar values, FTEs, KPIs, and technical accomplishments). |
| rfp_section_l_m_requirements | string | yes | Target RFP Section L (Volume III Past Performance instructions, recency window, minimum annual/total dollar value, max citations), Section M (relevance evaluation criteria), and Section C/PWS core ta… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| past_performance_citations | array | – | List of Shipley-formatted Past Performance citations with Relevance ratings, Scope/Magnitude/Complexity matrices, and CPARS narratives. |
| ppq_and_cor_interview_prep_checklist | array | – | Actionable checklist for preparing Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) and briefing Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs) before government reference checks. |
| relevance_gaps_and_mitigations | array | – | Evaluator risk audit of potential Relevance gaps paired with FAR 15.305(a)(2) mitigation language. |
| volume_summary | object | – | Executive Past Performance Volume III summary, DoD Confidence rating prediction, and ready-to-paste Volume Introduction. |
No examples provided.
generate_cui_marking_distribution_plan Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI / 32 CFR 2002 & DoDI 5200.48) Handling Plan ~528
Analyze deliverables against the NARA CUI Registry, 32 CFR Part 2002, and DoDI 5200.48 to generate exact CUI banner/portion markings, DoD Distribution Statements (A–F), and a CUI Sanitization & Spill Response SOP. Returns a strictly validated `CuiMarkingPlanResponse` JSON object containing `cui_registry_governance_overview`, `deliverable_cui_banner_and_distribution_matrix`, `portion_marking_and_designation_indicator_blocks`, and `nist_800_88_sanitization_and_spill_response_sop` grounded in 32 CFR Part 2002 (NARA CUI Program), DoDI 5200.48 (Controlled Unclassified Information), DoDI 5230.24 (Distribution Statements), & NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 1. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `deliverables_and_security_classification_guide_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `cui_authority_framework` and `controlling_dod_office_and_ldc_context` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI / 32 CFR 2002 & DoDI 5200.48) Handling Plan workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| controlling_dod_office_and_ldc_context | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Controlling DoD Office: AFLCMC/HNC (Hanscom AFB, MA) | Limited Dissemination Controls: NOFORN, FEDCON, DL ON… |
| cui_authority_framework | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to '32_CFR_Part_2002_NARA_CUI_Registry_DoDI_5200_48_And_DoDI_5230_24_Distribution_Statements'). |
| deliverables_and_security_classification_guide_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI / 32 CFR 2002 & DoDI 5200.48) Handling Plan (15 to 45,000… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cui_registry_governance_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| deliverable_cui_banner_and_distribution_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| nist_800_88_sanitization_and_spill_response_sop | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| portion_marking_and_designation_indicator_blocks | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_data_rights_assertion_table Generate DFARS 252.227-7017 & FAR 52.227-14 IP & Data Rights Assertion Table ~567
Audit software components, AI/ML models and weights, firmware, technical data packages, and CDRL deliverables by development funding history (100% private expense, SBIR/STTR, mixed funding, or government-funded) to generate a 4-column DFARS 252.227-7017 Data Rights Assertion Table, verbatim DFARS 252.227-7013/7014/7018 and FAR 52.227-14 restrictive marking legends, a 10 U.S.C. 4401 Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) boundary and DFARS 252.227-7027 deferred-ordering protection plan, and a pre-award IP negotiation checklist. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive Government Contracts IP compliance generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `software_modules_and_cdrl_deliverables_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `governing_acquisition_regime` and `modular_open_systems_approach_mosa_context` calibrate DoD DFARS vs. Civilian FAR data rights rules and 10 U.S.C. 4401 open interface boundaries). Use this tool when building a proposal's DFARS 252.227-7017 / FAR 52.227-14 Data Rights Assertion Table, verbatim restrictive legends, or MOSA IP segregation plan; use `generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization` instead for full SBIR/STTR Phase I-III work plans, or `scan_far_dfars_clauses` for general Section I FAR/DFARS clause scanning.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| governing_acquisition_regime | string | – | Applicable IP clause framework: DoD DFARS 252.227-7013/7014/7015/7017/7018 (SBIR) or Civilian FAR 52.227-14 / 52.227-19 (defaults to 'DoD_DFARS_252_227_7013_7014_7015_7017_And_7018'). |
| modular_open_systems_approach_mosa_context | string | – | 10 U.S.C. 4401 Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) interface strategy separating open APIs/form-fit-function data from proprietary source code and model weights (defaults to 'MOSA_Open_API_Boundary_… |
| software_modules_and_cdrl_deliverables_text | string | yes | Inventory of software components, AI/ML models, weights, firmware, technical data packages, and CDRL deliverables with their development funding history (100% private expense, mixed funding, SBIR/STT… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dfars_252_227_7017_assertion_table | array | – | Complete 4-column DFARS 252.227-7017 Identification and Assertion of Use, Release, or Disclosure Restrictions table. |
| ip_strategy_executive_overview | object | – | Executive summary of the data rights assertion posture, background IP protection, and MOSA alignment. |
| mosa_and_deferred_ordering_protection_plan | object | – | 10 U.S.C. § 4401 MOSA interface boundary plan, black-box encapsulation strategy, and DFARS 252.227-7027/7037 audit defense. |
| pre_award_ip_negotiation_checklist | array | – | Pre-award checklist for submitting the signed DFARS 252.227-7017 attachment with the proposal and negotiating Specially Negotiated License Rights. |
| restrictive_marking_and_legend_templates | array | – | Verbatim DFARS/FAR restrictive legends and placement instructions for source code, binaries, and technical data deliverables. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_doe_national_lab_mando_subcontract DOE / NNSA National Lab M&O Subcontract & DEAR (48 CFR Ch. 9) Compliance Auditor ~546
Audit DOE/NNSA Management & Operating (M&O) National Laboratory solicitations (Sandia, LANL, ORNL, LLNL) for DEAR 48 CFR 952/970 clauses, Q-Clearance / L-Clearance requirements, Foreign National Unclassified Visits (DOE O 142.3B), and patent waivers. Returns a strictly validated `DoeDearSubcontractResponse` JSON object containing `doe_national_lab_subcontract_overview`, `dear_48_cfr_952_970_clause_audit_matrix`, `q_l_clearance_foci_and_doe_o_142_3b_controls`, and `patent_rights_and_crada_tech_transfer_strategy` grounded in 48 CFR Chapter 9 (DEAR Parts 952 & 970), 10 CFR Part 710 (Q/L Access Authorizations), DOE O 142.3B, & DOE O 470.4B. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `doe_national_lab_rfp_and_dear_clauses_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `target_national_lab_and_mando_prime` and `clearance_and_ip_posture` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing DOE / NNSA National Lab M&O Subcontract & DEAR (48 CFR Ch. 9) Compliance Auditor workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clearance_and_ip_posture | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'DOE Q-Clearance / L-Clearance Cross-Over from DoD TS/Secret + Domestic Small Business Patent Retention (DEAR… |
| doe_national_lab_rfp_and_dear_clauses_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for DOE / NNSA National Lab M&O Subcontract & DEAR (48 CFR Ch. 9) Compliance Auditor (15 to 45,000 cha… |
| target_national_lab_and_mando_prime | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'Sandia_National_Laboratories_NTESS_And_Los_Alamos_National_Lab_Triad_NNSA'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dear_48_cfr_952_970_clause_audit_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| doe_national_lab_subcontract_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| patent_rights_and_crada_tech_transfer_strategy | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| q_l_clearance_foci_and_doe_o_142_3b_controls | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_evms_ipmdr_variance_analysis Calculate EVMS Metrics (CPI, SPI, TCPI, IEAC) & Generate IPMDR Format 5 Narratives ~532
Calculate Earned Value Management System (EVMS) performance indices (CV, CV%, SV, SV%, CPI, SPI, TCPI_BAC, VAC, and 3-method Independent Estimate at Completion [IEAC]) across Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Control Accounts under DFARS 252.234-7001/7002, FAR 52.234-4, and NDIA EIA-748-D (32 Guidelines), and generate ready-to-submit DI-MGMT-81861C IPMDR Format 5 Root-Cause Variance Analysis (isolating Rate vs. Usage and Schedule drivers), Critical Path impact assessments, and Control Account Manager (CAM) Corrective Action Plans with Estimated Completion Dates (ECDs). This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive earned-value calculation and CDRL narrative generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `wbs_control_account_metrics_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `variance_reporting_thresholds` and `evms_reporting_standard` calibrate CDRL breach flags and EIA-748 Management Reserve / baseline integrity audits). Use this tool when computing WBS Control Account CPI/SPI/TCPI/IEAC metrics and drafting monthly IPMR/IPMDR Format 5 Variance Analysis CDRL narratives; use `audit_dcaa_accounting_sf1408` instead for pre-award DCAA SF 1408 accounting system adequacy, or `generate_quality_assurance_qasp` for FAR 37.6 QASP and SLA surveillance matrices.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| evms_reporting_standard | string | – | Target EVMS reporting DID and standard (DI-MGMT-81861C IPMDR Format 5, DFARS 252.234-7002, and EIA-748-D 32 Guidelines; defaults to 'DI_MGMT_81861C_IPMDR_Format_5_And_EIA_748_D_32_Guidelines'). |
| variance_reporting_thresholds | string | – | Contract CDRL variance reporting thresholds (e.g., +/- 10% and +/- $50,000 current period or cumulative CV/SV; defaults to 'Plus_Minus_10_Percent_And_50000_USD_Cumulative_Format_5'). |
| wbs_control_account_metrics_text | string | yes | WBS Control Account metrics (BCWS/PV, BCWP/EV, ACWP/AC, BAC), technical/schedule/rate variance drivers, Management Reserve (MR) balance, and contract reporting thresholds (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| control_account_format_5_narratives | array | – | Ready-to-submit IPMDR Format 5 Variance Analysis narratives with Root Cause, Impact, and CAM Corrective Action Plans for each WBS Control Account. |
| evms_executive_program_summary | object | – | Program-level EVMS rollup, CPI/SPI/TCPI realism check, and EIA-748 compliance overview. |
| ieac_and_baseline_integrity_audit | object | – | 3-method Independent Estimate at Completion (IEAC) comparison, Management Reserve audit, and EIA-748 baseline integrity controls. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_fedramp_equivalency_body_of_evidence DoD FedRAMP Moderate Equivalency (2024 DoD CIO Memo) & 3PAO Body of Evidence Auditor ~559
Audit cloud service offerings against the DoD CIO FedRAMP Moderate Equivalency Memorandum (100% 3PAO assessment, zero unmitigated high/moderate POA&Ms, KSIs) and generates a complete Cloud Equivalency Body of Evidence (BoE) checklist. Returns a strictly validated `FedrampEquivalencyResponse` JSON object containing `dod_cio_equivalency_overview`, `body_of_evidence_boe_8_artifact_checklist`, `three_pao_100_pct_and_zero_poam_remediation_matrix`, and `dibcs_72hr_incident_reporting_and_prime_verification` grounded in DoD CIO Memorandum 'Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program Moderate Equivalency for Cloud Service Provider's Cloud Service Offerings' (Jan 2, 2024) & DFARS 252.204-7012(b)(2)(ii)(D). This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `cloud_service_offering_and_3pao_posture_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `target_equivalency_standard` and `underlying_iaas_and_fips_posture` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing DoD FedRAMP Moderate Equivalency (2024 DoD CIO Memo) & 3PAO Body of Evidence Auditor workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cloud_service_offering_and_3pao_posture_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for DoD FedRAMP Moderate Equivalency (2024 DoD CIO Memo) & 3PAO Body of Evidence Auditor (15 to 45,000… |
| target_equivalency_standard | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'DoD_CIO_Jan_2024_FedRAMP_Moderate_Equivalency_Memo_DFARS_252_204_7012_c_d_And_FedRAMP_Rev5'). |
| underlying_iaas_and_fips_posture | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Hosted on AWS GovCloud (US) FedRAMP High JAB P-ATO; FIPS 140-3 Validated Cryptographic Modules'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| body_of_evidence_boe_8_artifact_checklist | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| dibcs_72hr_incident_reporting_and_prime_verification | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| dod_cio_equivalency_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| three_pao_100_pct_and_zero_poam_remediation_matrix | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
No examples provided.
generate_gsa_mas_offer Generate GSA MAS Schedule SIN Mapping, 0.75% IFF Rate Card & PRC Compliance Package ~607
Map commercial labor rate cards, software/cloud SKUs, commercial discounting practices, and past project histories into a GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Large Category F (IT) eOffer or eMod package containing a Special Item Number (SIN) mapping matrix (`54151S`, `54151HACS`, `518210C`, `511210`, `OLM`), a GSA Price Proposal Template (PPT) ceiling rate card grossed up for the 0.75% Industrial Funding Fee (`Net / 0.9925`) with 5-year GSAR 552.238-118 EPA escalation, GSAR 552.238-81 Price Reductions Clause (PRC) / Most Favored Customer (MFC) guardrails, CSP-1 vs. Transactional Data Reporting (TDR) pathway recommendations, and a ready-to-submit SCP-FSS-001 proposal narrative. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive compliance and pricing generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `commercial_catalog_and_lcat_rates` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters and `corporate_experience_and_project_context` accepts 20 to 35,000 characters). Use this tool when preparing a GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) eOffer, SIN addition eMod, or GSAR 552.238-81 Price Reductions Clause (PRC) / MFC audit; use `generate_igce_price_to_win` instead for single-RFP IGCE wrap-rate and Price-to-Win modeling, or `match_key_personnel` to tailor individual candidate resumes to LCAT minimums.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| commercial_catalog_and_lcat_rates | string | yes | Commercial Price List (CPL), LCAT titles, hourly rates, minimum education/years of experience, software/SaaS SKUs, and standard commercial discounting practices (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| corporate_experience_and_project_context | string | yes | Past project experience for SCP-FSS-001 Factor 4 (1-2 completed projects per target SIN), target GSA IT/Cyber SINs (`54151S`, `54151HACS`, `518210C`), and commercial customer classes (20 to 35,000 ch… |
| pricing_disclosure_pathway | string | – | GSA MAS pricing disclosure pathway: 'CSP-1_Traditional_PRC' (traditional Commercial Sales Practices with Most Favored Customer tracking), 'TDR_Transactional_Data_Reporting' (GSAR 552.238-81 Alt I TDR… |
| submission_type | string | – | Submission mode: 'New_GSA_MAS_Offer' (default, full SCP-FSS-001 eOffer package) or 'Add_SIN_or_EPA_Price_Mod' (GSA eMod SIN addition or GSAR 552.238-118 Economic Price Adjustment). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| gsa_lcat_iff_price_list | array | – | GSA MAS Price Proposal Template (PPT) table with minimum education/experience, CPL rate, Net rate, 0.75% IFF ceiling rate (`Net / 0.9925`), and 5-year EPA progression. |
| gsa_mas_readiness_score | integer | – | Overall GSA eOffer / eMod readiness score (0-100) under SCP-FSS-001. |
| iff_and_epa_pricing_summary | string | – | Executive summary of the 0.75% Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) gross-up (`Net / 0.9925`), proposed GSA discount off CPL, and 5-year GSAR 552.238-118 EPA escalation. |
| prc_and_mfc_compliance_guardrails | array | – | GSAR 552.238-81 Price Reductions Clause (PRC) and Most Favored Customer (MFC) Basis of Award guardrails and safe-harbor exemptions. |
| ready_to_submit_scp_fss_001_narrative | string | – | Authoritative, paste-ready SCP-FSS-001 Administrative, Technical (Factor 1 Corporate Experience, Factor 2 Past Performance, Factor 3 Quality Control, Factor 4 Relevant SIN Experience), and Price Prop… |
| recommended_pricing_pathway | string | – | Recommended GSA pricing disclosure pathway (TDR Transactional Data Reporting vs. CSP-1 Traditional Most Favored Customer) with rationale. |
| sin_mapping_matrix | array | – | Structured GSA MAS Special Item Number (SIN) mapping matrix (`54151S`, `54151HACS`, `518210C`, `OLM`, etc.) with Factor 4 relevant project narratives. |
No examples provided.
generate_gsa_tdr_quarterly_sales_iff_reconciler GSA FAS Sales Reporting Portal (SRP), TDR Line-Item & IFF CAV/IOA Audit Reconciler ~569
Audit commercial vs. GSA Schedule invoices to separate Open-Market vs. Schedule sales, calculate quarterly 0.75% IFF remittance, validate Transactional Data Reporting (TDR) 16-field data elements, and prepare for a GSA IOA Contractor Assistance Visit (CAV). Returns a strictly validated `GsaTdrIffAuditResponse` JSON object containing `gsa_srp_and_iff_reconciliation_overview`, `invoice_schedule_vs_open_market_classification_table`, `tdr_16_field_validation_and_ioa_cav_checklist`, and `iff_remittance_calendar_and_price_reductions_safe_harbor` grounded in GSAR 552.238-80 (Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting — 0.75% IFF within 30 days of quarter close), GSAR 552.238-81 (TDR), & GSA IOA Contractor Assistance Visit (CAV) Guide. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `quarterly_invoice_ledger_and_gsa_contract_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `gsa_reporting_regime` and `reporting_quarter_and_sins` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing GSA FAS Sales Reporting Portal (SRP), TDR Line-Item & IFF CAV/IOA Audit Reconciler workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| gsa_reporting_regime | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'GSAR_552_238_80_IFF_0_75_Pct_GSAR_552_238_81_TDR_16_Data_Elements_And_IOA_CAV_Readiness'). |
| quarterly_invoice_ledger_and_gsa_contract_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for GSA FAS Sales Reporting Portal (SRP), TDR Line-Item & IFF CAV/IOA Audit Reconciler (15 to 45,000 c… |
| reporting_quarter_and_sins | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'FY2026 Q4 (July 1 – Sept 30; SRP Filing Due Oct 30) | SINs: 54151S, 54151HACS, 518210C, OLM'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| gsa_srp_and_iff_reconciliation_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| iff_remittance_calendar_and_price_reductions_safe_harbor | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| invoice_schedule_vs_open_market_classification_table | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| tdr_16_field_validation_and_ioa_cav_checklist | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
No examples provided.
generate_gwac_task_order_fair_opportunity GWAC / IDIQ Task Order Fair Opportunity (FAR 16.505) & Pool Selection Optimizer ~527
Match task order TORFPs across OASIS+, GSA Polaris, 8(a) STARS III, VETS 2, NASA SEWP, and NITAAC CIO-SP3/4 against vendor contract pools, scoring self-scoring scorecard matrices and drafting rapid 5-day TORFP responses. Returns a strictly validated `GwacTaskOrderResponse` JSON object containing `gwac_fair_opportunity_overview`, `vehicle_pool_and_scorecard_alignment_matrix`, `rapid_torfp_technical_and_staffing_sections`, and `far_16_505_protest_thresholds_and_ombudsman_governance` grounded in FAR 16.505(b)(1) (Fair Opportunity), FAR 16.505(a)(10) ($10M Civilian / $25M DoD Task Order Protest Jurisdictional Cap), & GSAR 552.216-74. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `torfp_scope_and_vehicle_holders_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `target_gwac_or_mac_vehicles` and `turnaround_window_and_evaluation_mode` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing GWAC / IDIQ Task Order Fair Opportunity (FAR 16.505) & Pool Selection Optimizer workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| target_gwac_or_mac_vehicles | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'GSA_OASIS_Plus_Unrestricted_And_SB_GSA_Polaris_8a_STARS_III_VETS_2_CIO_SP3'). |
| torfp_scope_and_vehicle_holders_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for GWAC / IDIQ Task Order Fair Opportunity (FAR 16.505) & Pool Selection Optimizer (15 to 45,000 char… |
| turnaround_window_and_evaluation_mode | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to '5-Business-Day Rapid TORFP Turnaround | FAR 16.505(b)(1) Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) / Fair Opp… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| far_16_505_protest_thresholds_and_ombudsman_governance | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| gwac_fair_opportunity_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| rapid_torfp_technical_and_staffing_sections | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| vehicle_pool_and_scorecard_alignment_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
No examples provided.
generate_igce_price_to_win Build GovCon IGCE, Indirect Wrap-Rate & Price-to-Win (PTW) Model ~562
Model an Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE), compounded Indirect Wrap-Rate breakdown (Fringe, Overhead, G&A, and Fee/Profit), GSA CALC+ aligned LCAT rate card, multi-year Section B CLIN pricing schedule, 4-scenario Price-to-Win (PTW) sensitivity matrix, and Shipley Volume IV Basis of Estimate (BOE) narrative from RFP Section B/SOW text. This is a read-only, stateless financial modeling and estimation call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `rfp_section_b_and_sow_text` accepts 30 to 120,000 characters, optional `historical_benchmark_and_incumbent_context` and `bidder_indirect_wrap_assumptions` anchor indirect multipliers and incumbent baselines, and `evaluation_methodology` calibrates FAR 15.101-1 Best-Value Tradeoff vs. LPTA or FAR 15.404-1(d) Cost Realism). Use this tool when building forward-looking Volume IV Price/Cost models, wrap-rate build-ups, and Price-to-Win targets; use `search_historical_awards` instead to query past FPDS/SAM award records, or `extract_pricing_schedule` to parse an existing vendor quote or invoice table.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bidder_indirect_wrap_assumptions | string | – | Optional bidder indirect rate assumptions (Fringe %, Overhead %, G&A %, Target Fee/Profit %, annual productive hours per FTE such as 1,880 or 1,920, and annual Option Year escalation %). |
| evaluation_methodology | string | – | Source selection evaluation methodology: 'BEST_VALUE_TRADEOFF' (FAR 15.101-1), 'LPTA_LOWEST_PRICE_TECHNICALLY_ACCEPTABLE' (FAR 15.101-2), 'HIGHEST_TECHNICALLY_RATED_FAIR_REASONABLE_PRICE', or 'COST_R… |
| historical_benchmark_and_incumbent_context | string | – | Optional incumbent contract value, FPDS/USAspending historical award benchmarks, GSA MAS SIN 54151S CALC+ ceiling rates, or known agency budget ceilings to anchor the IGCE and Price-to-Win model. |
| rfp_section_b_and_sow_text | string | yes | Raw RFP Section B (Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs), PWS/SOW level-of-effort & LCAT staffing requirements, contract type (FFP, T&M, Labor-Hour, CPFF), Period of Performance (Base + Option Years… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clin_period_of_performance_schedule | array | – | Section B CLIN pricing schedule across Base Year and Option Years. |
| cost_realism_and_price_reasonableness_posture | string | – | FAR 15.404-1 Price Reasonableness & Cost Realism risk classification. |
| independent_government_cost_estimate_igce_usd | number | – | Estimated Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) baseline ($ USD) across the full PoP. |
| lcat_rate_card_and_fte_buildup | array | – | Bottom-up LCAT staffing, unburdened direct wage, burdened bill rate, and GSA CALC+ benchmark table. |
| ptw_discount_vs_igce_pct | number | – | Percentage difference between recommended Price-to-Win and the estimated IGCE (e.g., -6.4 represents a 6.4% discount below IGCE). |
| ptw_sensitivity_scenarios | array | – | Competitive Price-to-Win sensitivity matrix (Aggressive Floor, Recommended Target PTW, Incumbent Benchmark, IGCE Ceiling). |
| recommended_price_to_win_usd | number | – | Recommended total evaluated Price-to-Win ($ USD) across Base + all Option Years. |
| section_b_cost_narrative_and_boe_summary | string | – | Ready-to-paste Shipley Volume IV Price/Cost Narrative and Basis of Estimate (BOE) justification. |
| solicitation_pricing_overview | string | – | Executive summary of contract structure, total FTEs, Period of Performance, and pricing strategy. |
| wrap_rate_calculator_breakdown | object | – | Compounded Fringe, Overhead, G&A, and Fee wrap-rate breakdown. |
No examples provided.
generate_justification_ja_sole_source FAR 6.302 / FAR 8.405-6 Sole-Source Justification & Approval (J&A / LSJ) Drafter ~540
Draft a complete 12-Part FAR 6.303-2 Justification & Approval (J&A), FAR 8.405-6 Limited Sources Justification (LSJ), or FAR 16.505(b)(2) Fair Opportunity Exception package for Contracting Officers. Returns a strictly validated `SoleSourceJaResponse` JSON object containing `statutory_exception_overview`, `far_6_303_2_twelve_part_ja_sections`, `unacceptable_delay_and_duplicative_cost_quantification`, and `sam_gov_posting_and_approval_routing` grounded in FAR 6.302-1 (10 U.S.C. § 3204(a)(1) / 41 U.S.C. § 3304(a)(1)), FAR 6.303-2 (12 Mandatory Content Elements), & FAR 8.405-6 / 16.505(b)(2). This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `sole_source_requirement_and_vendor_uniqueness_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `statutory_authority_pathway` and `estimated_dollar_value_and_approval_tier` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing FAR 6.302 / FAR 8.405-6 Sole-Source Justification & Approval (J&A / LSJ) Drafter workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| estimated_dollar_value_and_approval_tier | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to '$18.5M Total Estimated Value — Competition Advocate Approval Tier ($750K to $15M / $20M DoD PEO/HCA Threshol… |
| sole_source_requirement_and_vendor_uniqueness_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for FAR 6.302 / FAR 8.405-6 Sole-Source Justification & Approval (J&A / LSJ) Drafter (15 to 45,000 cha… |
| statutory_authority_pathway | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'FAR_6_302_1_Only_One_Responsible_Source_10_USC_3204_a_1'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| far_6_303_2_twelve_part_ja_sections | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| sam_gov_posting_and_approval_routing | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| statutory_exception_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| unacceptable_delay_and_duplicative_cost_quantification | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
No examples provided.
How do I install the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server is a hosted endpoint at https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com
claude mcp add --transport http aarbchen-signaltender-mcp 'https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp'
What is the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.aarbchen/signaltender-mcp. B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP server for live RFPs, contract parsing, compliance & proposal tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp).
Is the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server safe to use?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server expose?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server exposes 58 tools: parse_b2b_contract, audit_contract_risks, search_historical_awards, get_live_solicitations, generate_compliance_matrix, and 53 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 29,405 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server require authentication?
No. We connected to SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server still maintained?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.