SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server
REMOTE · B2B-CONTRACT-PARSER-API.ONRENDER.COM
B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP server for live RFPs, contract parsing, compliance & proposal tools.
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 69% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability59
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 29405 tokens (~506/item across 58 items; 58 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
- Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 58 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 58 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 0
- Tool “audit_section_508_vpat” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 16129 → 29405 ▼ functional
- New tool “audit_cyber_incident_dfars_7012” functional
- New tool “audit_govt_furnished_property_gfp” functional
- New tool “audit_itar_ear_export_control” functional
- New tool “audit_organizational_ethics_far_52_203_13” functional
- New tool “audit_service_contract_act_wage” functional
- New tool “generate_ai_governance_nist_ai_rmf_omb_m24” functional
- New tool “generate_award_fee_plan_incentive_maximizer” functional
- New tool “generate_cdrls_did_data_deliverables” functional
- New tool “generate_cost_accounting_cas_ds2” functional
- New tool “generate_cui_marking_distribution_plan” functional
- New tool “generate_doe_national_lab_mando_subcontract” functional
- New tool “generate_evms_ipmdr_variance_analysis” functional
- New tool “generate_fedramp_equivalency_body_of_evidence” functional
- New tool “generate_gsa_tdr_quarterly_sales_iff_reconciler” functional
- New tool “generate_gwac_task_order_fair_opportunity” functional
- New tool “generate_justification_ja_sole_source” functional
- New tool “generate_mentor_protege_jv_agreement” functional
- New tool “generate_novated_merger_change_of_name_far_42” functional
- New tool “generate_oconus_sofa_defense_logistics” functional
- New tool “generate_rea_equitable_adjustment” functional
- New tool “generate_section_l_m_proposal_red_team_scorer” functional
- New tool “generate_state_local_cooperative_piggyback” functional
- New tool “generate_termination_for_convenience_settlement” functional
- New tool “generate_value_engineering_vecp” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- 30 Oct 26 0
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 1.5.0 ▼ security
- Tool “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “generate_compliance_matrix” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “generate_sources_sought_response” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “match_capability_statement” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “scan_far_dfars_clauses” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_historical_awards” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 11386 → 16129 ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added a required parameter “award_notice_or_debrief_text”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added a required parameter “rfp_section_m_and_bidder_context”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” added a required parameter “rfp_security_and_ato_requirements”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” added a required parameter “system_architecture_and_boundary_context”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” added a required parameter “current_and_prior_contracts_portfolio”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” added a required parameter “target_solicitation_and_sow_text”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” added a required parameter “bidder_solution_and_key_personnel_context”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the required parameter “rfp_section_m_and_submitted_proposal_excerpts” ▼ functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the required parameter “unsuccessful_offeror_notice_and_debrief_text” ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” dropped the required parameter “cloud_hosting_and_inherited_controls_context” ▼ functional
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” dropped the required parameter “system_architecture_and_rfp_cyber_text” ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” dropped the required parameter “existing_contracts_and_corporate_relationships” ▼ functional
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” dropped the required parameter “new_solicitation_scope_and_oci_clauses” ▼ functional
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” dropped the required parameter “proposed_solution_and_key_personnel” ▼ functional
- New tool “audit_dcaa_accounting_sf1408” functional
- New tool “audit_foci_dd254_clearance” functional
- New tool “generate_capture_black_hat_review” functional
- New tool “generate_data_rights_assertion_table” functional
- New tool “generate_ota_white_paper” functional
- New tool “generate_phase_in_transition_plan” functional
- New tool “generate_post_award_cpar_rebuttal” functional
- New tool “generate_quality_assurance_qasp” functional
- New tool “generate_small_business_participation” functional
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added an optional parameter “analysis_mode” cosmetic
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” added an optional parameter “procurement_jurisdiction” cosmetic
- “audit_contract_risks” added an optional parameter “focus_categories” cosmetic
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” added an optional parameter “target_ato_timeline_days” cosmetic
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” added an optional parameter “proposed_bidding_role_and_teaming_structure” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” added an optional parameter “presentation_format” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” added an optional parameter “total_session_minutes” cosmetic
- “generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization” added an optional parameter “sponsoring_agency_or_program” cosmetic
- “get_live_solicitations” added an optional parameter “closing_after” cosmetic
- “scan_far_dfars_clauses” added an optional parameter “handles_cui_or_cdi” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” added an optional parameter “limit” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” added an optional parameter “max_amount_usd” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” added an optional parameter “min_amount_usd” cosmetic
- “classify_naics_psc_nigp” reworded the description of “context_type” cosmetic
- “extract_pricing_schedule” reworded the description of “expected_document_type” cosmetic
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” reworded the description of “target_authorization_framework” cosmetic
- “generate_compliance_matrix” reworded the description of “proposal_methodology” cosmetic
- “generate_rfp_response” reworded the description of “target_section_type” cosmetic
- “generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization” reworded the description of “target_phase_and_program” cosmetic
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- “match_capability_statement” reworded the description of “target_pursuit_role” cosmetic
- “parse_b2b_contract” reworded the description of “document_type_hint” cosmetic
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the optional parameter “award_and_debrief_timeline_context” cosmetic
- “analyze_debriefing_bid_protest” dropped the optional parameter “target_acquisition_regime” cosmetic
- “generate_ato_rmf_package” dropped the optional parameter “target_impact_level” cosmetic
- “generate_oci_mitigation_plan” dropped the optional parameter “proposed_mitigation_posture” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” dropped the optional parameter “known_incumbent_and_risk_areas” cosmetic
- “generate_oral_presentation_prep” dropped the optional parameter “presentation_format_mode” cosmetic
- “search_historical_awards” made “keywords” optional cosmetic
- 29 Oct 26 +1
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- New tool “audit_supply_chain_scrm” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- New tool “audit_section_508_vpat” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
- 27 Oct 26 0
- Tool “get_live_solicitations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- New tool “generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization” functional
- “get_live_solicitations” reworded the description of “state” cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onrender.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137 |
| SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onrender.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
generate_mentor_protege_jv_agreement Generate SBA Mentor-Protégé (13 CFR 125.9) & Joint Venture Operating Agreement ~641
Audit and generate SBA All-Small Mentor-Protégé Program Agreements (13 CFR 125.9) and unpopulated Joint Venture Operating Agreements (13 CFR 125.8, 121.103(h), 124.513 8(a), 126.616 HUBZone, 127.506 WOSB, 128.402 SDVOSB), returning an SBA affiliation safe-harbor overview, all mandatory 13 CFR 125.8(b)(2) Operating Agreement clauses (Protégé Managing Venturer & Responsible Manager controls neutralizing OHA negative-control protests, >= 40% substantive Protégé workshare, commensurate profit distribution, dual-signature JV bank account, and equipment/labor schedules), a quantitative 40% Protégé workshare and FAR 52.219-14 audit, and a 6-year SBA MPP Developmental Plan blueprint. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon corporate structuring and SBA compliance generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `mentor_and_protege_profile_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `target_set_aside_and_jv_type` and `agreement_deliverable_scope` calibrate SBA socio-economic JV rules and developmental assistance plans). Use this tool when drafting or auditing an SBA 13 CFR 125.8 Joint Venture Operating Agreement or 13 CFR 125.9 Mentor-Protégé Developmental Plan to survive OHA size/status protests; use `generate_teaming_strategy` instead for standard FAR Subpart 9.6 Prime/Subcontractor Teaming Agreements, or `generate_small_business_participation` for Large Business Prime FAR 52.219-9 Subcontracting Plans.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agreement_deliverable_scope | string | – | Deliverable scope: 13 CFR 125.8(b)(2) Joint Venture Operating Agreement + Solicitation Addendum Clauses, 13 CFR 125.9 SBA Mentor-Protégé Developmental Plan, and OHA Size/Status Protest Pre-Audit (def… |
| mentor_and_protege_profile_text | string | yes | Profiles of the Protégé (Managing Venturer) and Mentor (Partner Venturer), socioeconomic certifications (Small, 8(a), SDVOSB, WOSB, HUBZone), target solicitation details, and proposed workshare split… |
| target_set_aside_and_jv_type | string | – | Target socioeconomic set-aside and SBA JV regulation (13 CFR 125.8 Small Business, 128.402 SDVOSB, 124.513 8(a), 127.506 WOSB, or 126.616 HUBZone; defaults to 'Unpopulated_SDVOSB_And_All_Small_MPP_Jo… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| forty_percent_workshare_and_limitations_audit | object | – | Quantitative audit of FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting and the mandatory >= 40% Protégé workshare rule. |
| mentor_protege_and_jv_overview | object | – | Executive overview of SBA regulatory compliance, unpopulated LLC structure, affiliation safe harbor, and 2-year rule. |
| sba_mpp_developmental_plan_blueprint | object | – | SBA All-Small Mentor-Protégé Program (13 CFR 125.9) developmental assistance blueprint and term compliance check. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| thirteen_cfr_125_8_mandatory_clauses | array | – | Complete set of 13 CFR 125.8(b)(2) mandatory Joint Venture Operating Agreement clauses neutralizing OHA protest traps. |
No examples provided.
generate_novated_merger_change_of_name_far_42 GovCon M&A Contract Novation (FAR 42.1204) & Change-of-Name Due Diligence Package ~561
Generate a complete FAR 42.1204 Three-Party Novation Agreement package for GovCon asset/stock acquisitions, auditing anti-assignment exceptions (41 U.S.C. 6305), SAM.gov UEI/CAGE transfer checklists, and SBA recertification triggers under 13 CFR 121.404(g). Returns a strictly validated `NovationFar42Response` JSON object containing `transaction_structure_and_novation_overview`, `far_42_1204_document_checklist_and_three_party_agreement`, `sba_13_cfr_121_404_recertification_and_backlog_audit`, and `sam_uei_cage_and_dcsa_fcl_transition_runbook` grounded in 41 U.S.C. § 6305 (Anti-Assignment Act), FAR Subpart 42.12 (FAR 42.1204 Novation & FAR 42.1205 Change-of-Name), & 13 CFR § 121.404(g). This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `m_and_a_transaction_and_contract_backlog_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `deal_structure_and_pathway` and `small_business_and_clearance_context` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing GovCon M&A Contract Novation (FAR 42.1204) & Change-of-Name Due Diligence Package workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| deal_structure_and_pathway | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'Asset_Purchase_Requiring_FAR_42_1204_Three_Party_Novation_vs_Stock_Purchase_Or_FAR_42_1205_Change_Of_Name'). |
| m_and_a_transaction_and_contract_backlog_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for GovCon M&A Contract Novation (FAR 42.1204) & Change-of-Name Due Diligence Package (15 to 45,000 ch… |
| small_business_and_clearance_context | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Audit 13 CFR 121.404(g) 30-Day SBA Size Recertification, GWAC/MAC Eligibility, & DCSA 32 CFR 117 Changed Con… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| far_42_1204_document_checklist_and_three_party_agreement | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| sam_uei_cage_and_dcsa_fcl_transition_runbook | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| sba_13_cfr_121_404_recertification_and_backlog_audit | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| transaction_structure_and_novation_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
No examples provided.
generate_oci_mitigation_plan Audit FAR Subpart 9.5 Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) & Generate Mitigation Plan ~455
Audit existing prime/subcontract awards (SETA, A&AS, IV&V, Systems Engineering, Cloud Architecture) against a target solicitation scope to detect Unequal Access to Information, Biased Ground Rules, and Impaired Objectivity under FAR Subpart 9.5 (FAR 9.505-1 through 9.505-4) and generate an OCI Risk Score (0-100), a 3-Pillar Case-Law Audit Matrix, an Organizational Firewall & NDA Control Matrix, and a ready-to-submit OCI Disclosure & Mitigation Plan volume. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive compliance and legal-engineering generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `new_solicitation_scope_and_oci_clauses` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters and `existing_contracts_and_corporate_relationships` accepts 20 to 35,000 characters). Use this tool when auditing FAR 9.5 / DFARS 252.209-7008 / 252.209-7009 Organizational Conflicts of Interest or drafting an OCI Mitigation Plan & Non-Disclosure Firewall; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general Section I FAR/DFARS flow-down clause scanning, or `generate_teaming_strategy` to structure 13 CFR 125.6 Prime/Sub workshare splits.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| current_and_prior_contracts_portfolio | string | yes | Summary of the bidder's (and any proposed subcontractor's) active or recent prime/sub contracts, SETA/A&AS/IV&V advisory roles, and access to nonpublic source-selection or proprietary third-party dat… |
| proposed_bidding_role_and_teaming_structure | string | – | Bidder's pursuit structure ('Prime_Offeror', 'Subcontractor_or_Teaming_Partner', 'Joint_Venture_or_Mentor_Protege', or 'SETA_or_A_and_AS_Incumbent_Pivoting_to_Development'). |
| target_solicitation_and_sow_text | string | yes | Full or excerpted target RFP scope, PWS/SOW tasks, Section H/I/K/L OCI disclosure instructions, and issuing agency/program office. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| executive_oci_risk_summary | string | – | Executive legal and capture summary of the OCI audit findings for the Contracting Officer and Capture Director. |
| oci_clearance_and_defensibility_score | integer | – | 0-100 score indicating how defensible the bidder's OCI posture and mitigation plan are against Contracting Officer exclusion or GAO bid protest. |
| organizational_firewall_and_nda_controls | array | – | Concrete organizational, technical (IT/GovCloud enclave), personnel NDA, and workshare carve-out controls. |
| overall_oci_determination | string | – | Formal FAR Subpart 9.5 OCI risk determination and pursuit posture recommendation. |
| ready_to_submit_oci_mitigation_plan_narrative | string | – | Complete, paste-ready Volume I / Section L Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Disclosure & Mitigation Plan narrative including a FAR 9.505-4 Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) template and Contrac… |
| three_pillar_far_9_5_audit_matrix | array | – | Comprehensive audit across all three FAR Subpart 9.5 / GAO OCI pillars: Unequal Access to Information (FAR 9.505-4), Biased Ground Rules (FAR 9.505-1/9.505-2), and Impaired Objectivity (FAR 9.505-3). |
No examples provided.
generate_oconus_sofa_defense_logistics DoD OCONUS / INDOPACOM Deployment, SOFA, Defense Base Act (DBA) & SPOT Compliance ~563
Evaluate Pacific/OCONUS defense IT solicitations for Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) TESA/TDY accreditation, FAR 52.228-3 Defense Base Act (DBA) insurance wraps, DFARS 252.225-7040 SPOT synchronization, and COLA/Post Allowance rate structures. Returns a strictly validated `OconusSofaDbaResponse` JSON object containing `oconus_theater_deployment_overview`, `sofa_host_nation_accreditation_matrix`, `dba_insurance_and_dssr_allowance_model`, and `spot_loa_and_crc_deployment_checklist` grounded in FAR 52.228-3 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1651–1654 Defense Base Act), DFARS 252.225-7040 / 252.225-7995 (SPOT LOA), & DSSR Chapters 130/220/650. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `oconus_pws_and_theater_clauses_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `target_combatant_command_and_host_nations` and `dba_and_dssr_allowance_assumptions` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing DoD OCONUS / INDOPACOM Deployment, SOFA, Defense Base Act (DBA) & SPOT Compliance workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dba_and_dssr_allowance_assumptions | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'FAR 52.228-3 Defense Base Act (DBA) Insurance + DSSR Living Quarters Allowance (LQA), Post Allowance (COLA),… |
| oconus_pws_and_theater_clauses_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for DoD OCONUS / INDOPACOM Deployment, SOFA, Defense Base Act (DBA) & SPOT Compliance (15 to 45,000 ch… |
| target_combatant_command_and_host_nations | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'USINDOPACOM_USFJ_Japan_USFK_Korea_Guam_And_USEUCOM_Germany_DOCPER_TESA'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dba_insurance_and_dssr_allowance_model | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| oconus_theater_deployment_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| sofa_host_nation_accreditation_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| spot_loa_and_crc_deployment_checklist | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_oral_presentation_prep Build GovCon Oral Presentation Deck, Live Tech-Demo Runbook & Murder-Board Q&A ~544
Generate a FAR 15.102 & Shipley Phase-II Oral Presentation slide-by-slide blueprint, Key Personnel speaker-attributed talking points, a minute-by-minute Live Technical Demonstration / Scenario Challenge runbook with zero-downtime failover contingencies, an adversarial SSEB 'Murder Board' Q&A coaching matrix, and evaluator caucus takeaways from RFP Section L/M oral instructions. This is a read-only, stateless generative preparation call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `rfp_oral_instructions_and_sow_text` accepts 30 to 120,000 characters, `proposed_solution_and_key_personnel` maps slides strictly to eligible Key Personnel speakers, optional `known_incumbent_and_risk_areas` sharpens Murder-Board trap questions, and `presentation_format_mode` selects 'COMBINED_ORALS_TECH_DEMO_AND_QA' [default], 'EXECUTIVE_SLIDE_BRIEFING_AND_QA', 'LIVE_TECHNICAL_SCENARIO_CHALLENGE', or 'KEY_PERSONNEL_INTERVIEW_AND_CAUCUS'). Use this tool when preparing for Phase-II advisory down-select oral presentations, live technical demonstrations, or SSEB Q&A caucuses; use `generate_rfp_response` instead for written Volume I Technical Approach prose, or `match_key_personnel` for written Volume II resumes and Letters of Commitment.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bidder_solution_and_key_personnel_context | string | yes | Proposed Key Personnel names/roles/clearances, technical architecture, past performance metrics, and competitive win themes to weave into the speaker scripts and Murder-Board Q&A answers. |
| presentation_format | string | – | Oral evaluation format: 'far_15_102_oral_technical_proposal' (default Federal FAR 15.102 / GSA FEDSIM Phase II Orals), 'live_technical_demo_and_coding_challenge' (hands-on tech demo & scenario execut… |
| rfp_oral_instructions_and_sow_text | string | yes | Raw RFP Section L Oral Presentation / Live Tech-Demo rules (time limits, slide limits, speaker eligibility restrictions under FAR 15.102, live scenario prompts), Section M evaluation criteria, and PW… |
| total_session_minutes | integer | – | Total scheduled duration of the oral presentation, live demo, and Q&A session in minutes (15 to 240; defaults to 90). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| closing_evaluator_leave_behind_pitch | string | – | Final 60-second executive closing statement designed to anchor 'High Confidence / Multiple Significant Strengths' before the SSEB caucuses. |
| key_personnel_speaker_choreography | array | – | Rules of engagement and handoff choreography ensuring every Key Personnel speaker demonstrates deep technical mastery without talking over teammates. |
| live_tech_demo_runbook | array | – | Step-by-step live technical demonstration runbook with operator actions, evaluator strength callouts, and offline failover contingencies. |
| murder_board_qna_bank | array | – | Adversarial SSEB Murder-Board questions with hidden evaluator concerns, responder roles, gold-standard answers, and traps to avoid. |
| recommended_time_budget_breakdown | string | – | Minute-by-minute time allocation across Opening/Intros, Core Technical Slides, Live Demo, Caucus Buffer, and Q&A. |
| slide_deck_blueprint | array | – | Slide-by-slide Shipley oral presentation blueprint with action captions, speaker assignments, visual concepts, and verbatim scripts. |
| solicitation_and_format_summary | string | – | Identified solicitation title/ID, oral format, speaker restrictions, and Section M evaluation hierarchy. |
No examples provided.
generate_ota_white_paper Generate DoD Other Transaction Authority (OTA / 10 U.S.C. 4022) Prototype White Paper & Milestone Schedule ~571
Convert commercial dual-use technology specifications and DoD Problem Statements / Commercial Solutions Openings (CSOs) / Request for Prototype Proposals (RPPs) across DIU, C5ISR/CECOM, SOSSEC, SpEC, MTEC, NSTXL, and AFWERX into a 10 U.S.C. 4022 statutory eligibility assessment, evaluator-ready OTA Prototype White Paper sections, an outcome-based Fixed-Price Payable Milestone Schedule & Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM), a Phase 3 Sole-Source Follow-On Production Strategy under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), an OTA Intellectual Property & Data Rights posture (FAR/DFARS/Bayh-Dole exempt), and consortium pitch deck talking points. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive capture and prototype proposal generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `commercial_solution_and_problem_topic_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `target_ota_consortium_and_pathway` and `nontraditional_contractor_and_cost_share_status` calibrate consortium formatting and 10 U.S.C. 4022(d)(1) Nontraditional Defense Contractor [NDC], Small Business, or 1/3 cost-share rules). Use this tool when drafting a DoD 10 U.S.C. 4022 Other Transaction Authority (OTA) Prototype White Paper, DIU Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) solution brief, or Fixed-Price Payable Milestone Schedule; use `generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization` instead for 15 U.S.C. 638 SBIR/STTR Phase I-III proposals, or `generate_rfp_response` for traditional FAR Part 15 technical proposal volumes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| commercial_solution_and_problem_topic_text | string | yes | DoD Problem Statement / CSO / RPP topic description (DIU, C5ISR/CECOM, SOSSEC, SpEC, MTEC, NSTXL) and vendor's dual-use commercial technology, TRL, and architecture (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| nontraditional_contractor_and_cost_share_status | string | – | 10 U.S.C. 4022 statutory eligibility posture: Nontraditional Defense Contractor (NDC), Small Business, or Traditional Defense Contractor with NDC sub / 1/3 cost-share (defaults to 'Nontraditional_Def… |
| target_ota_consortium_and_pathway | string | – | Target OTA pathway or consortium (e.g., DIU Commercial Solutions Opening [CSO], SOSSEC, SpEC Space Enterprise Consortium, C5ISR, NSTXL, AFWERX; defaults to 'DIU_Commercial_Solutions_Opening_CSO'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| consortium_pitch_deck_talking_points | array | – | High-impact talking points for the Phase 2 DIU / Consortium oral pitch and live technical demonstration. |
| dual_use_and_follow_on_production_strategy | object | – | TRL advancement roadmap, commercial dual-use viability, and 10 U.S.C. 4022(f) non-competitive follow-on production transition strategy. |
| executive_white_paper_sections | array | – | Evaluator-ready OTA Prototype White Paper / Solution Brief sections tailored to DIU CSO and DoD Consortium scoring criteria. |
| intellectual_property_and_data_rights_posture | object | – | OTA Intellectual Property and Data Rights negotiation posture leveraging FAR/DFARS/Bayh-Dole exemptions. |
| ota_statutory_eligibility_assessment | object | – | 10 U.S.C. 4022 statutory eligibility assessment covering NDC/Small Business status, cost-share exemption, and 10 U.S.C. 4022(f) sole-source production eligibility. |
| payable_milestone_schedule_and_rom | array | – | Outcome-based Fixed-Price Payable Milestone Schedule and Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) pricing table. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_phase_in_transition_plan Generate GovCon 30/60/90-Day Phase-In / Phase-Out Transition & Incumbent Capture Plan ~600
Generate a risk-mitigated 30/60/90-Day Phase-In and Phase-Out Transition Plan from solicitation Section C/L/M transition instructions and incumbent workforce context, returning a 0-100 Transition Risk Readiness Score, an executive transition summary, chronological Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) milestones across Days 1-30, 31-60, and 61-90 (plus Phase-Out), an Executive Order 14055 / Service Contract Act (SCA) Incumbent Workforce Capture & Right-of-First-Refusal retention plan with DD-254/DISS clearance crossover timelines and outreach scripts, functional Knowledge Transfer & Shadowing tracks with COR Operational Readiness Review (ORR) gates, a FAR 52.237-3 Continuity of Services Phase-Out checklist, and a ready-to-submit Shipley Transition Plan proposal volume. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive capture and program-management generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `solicitation_transition_and_sow_text` accepts 30 to 75,000 characters, optional `incumbent_workforce_and_clearance_context` accepts up to 50,000 characters, and `transition_timeline_window` calibrates milestone cadences across 30-day rapid cutovers, standard 30/60/90-day transitions, 120-day enterprise transitions, and FAR 52.237-3 phase-outs). Use this tool when drafting a Phase-In / Phase-Out Transition Plan volume, WBS mobilization schedule, or incumbent staff capture strategy; use `match_key_personnel` instead to audit and format individual Key Personnel resumes and Letters of Commitment, or `generate_teaming_strategy` for 13 CFR 125.6 Prime/Sub workshare splits.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clearance_requirement | string | – | Optional personnel and facility security clearance level required (DD-254 / DISS / Public Trust). |
| incumbent_workforce_and_clearance_context | string | – | Optional incumbent contractor details, target FTE count, Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) / Service Contract Act (SCA) context, and DD-254 facility/personnel security clearance transfer requirem… |
| solicitation_transition_and_sow_text | string | yes | Solicitation Section C/L/M transition instructions, PWS scope, incumbent staffing size, clearance levels, and continuity-of-operations mandates (30 to 75,000 characters). |
| target_agency | string | – | Optional issuing agency or contracting office. |
| transition_duration_days | integer | – | Optional total Phase-In transition duration in calendar days (15 to 180; defaults to 90). |
| transition_timeline_window | string | – | Transition schedule profile ('Rapid_30_Day_Cutover', 'Standard_30_60_90_Day_Phase_In', 'Extended_120_Day_Enterprise_Transition', or 'Include_Phase_Out_FAR_52_237_3'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| executive_transition_summary | string | – | Executive summary of the zero-mission-disruption Phase-In / Phase-Out strategy, governance structure, and Day-1 Full Operational Capability (FOC) roadmap. |
| far_52_237_3_phase_out_continuity_checklist | array | – | FAR 52.237-3 Continuity of Services Phase-Out checklist covering GFE/GFP return, CUI sanitization, credential revocation, and successor contractor training. |
| incumbent_capture_and_retention_plan | object | – | Comprehensive incumbent workforce capture, EO 14055 / SCA right-of-first-refusal compliance, DD-254/DISS clearance crossover timeline, and outreach script. |
| knowledge_transfer_and_shadowing_schedule | array | – | Functional knowledge transfer tracks with side-by-side shadowing durations, artifact handover checklists, and COR Operational Readiness Review (ORR) gates. |
| ready_to_submit_transition_volume | string | – | Complete, paste-ready Shipley Phase-In / Phase-Out Transition Plan proposal volume narrative in Markdown. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| transition_risk_readiness_score | integer | – | 0-100 score quantifying Day-1 operational continuity, incumbent capture probability, and FAR 52.237-3 compliance readiness. |
| wbs_30_60_90_day_milestones | array | – | Chronological Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) transition milestones across Days 1-30, Days 31-60, Days 61-90 (and Phase-Out) with activities, deliverables, exit criteria, and risk mitigations. |
No examples provided.
generate_post_award_cpar_rebuttal Generate FAR 42.1503 CPARS Self-Assessment & 14-Day Reviewing Official Rebuttal ~515
Transform contract performance metrics (SLA attainment, CDRL on-time delivery, cost variance, key personnel stability, small business utilization) and Assessing Official (AO) draft CPAR narratives into a FAR 42.1503 Table 42-1 justified CPARS Self-Assessment Package, factor-by-factor rating upgrade narratives (Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Small Business), a formal 14-Calendar-Day Reviewing Official (RO) Rebuttal Brief correcting factual omissions and excusable Government GFE delays, and a COR Evidence Binder checklist. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive post-award past-performance generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `contract_metrics_and_assessing_official_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `cpar_submission_mode` and `target_far_42_1503_rating_goal` calibrate proactive annual self-assessments vs. 14-day non-concurrence rebuttals under FAR 42.1503(d)). Use this tool when preparing an annual CPARS Self-Assessment for the COR/Assessing Official or rebutting an unfavorable draft CPAR within the statutory 14-calendar-day window; use `generate_cpars_past_performance` instead when formatting already-completed historical contracts into a Proposal Volume III Past Performance submission, or `analyze_debriefing_bid_protest` for FAR 15.506 post-award debriefings and GAO bid protests.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_metrics_and_assessing_official_text | string | yes | Contract performance metrics (SLA attainment, CDRL on-time delivery, cost variance, key personnel fill rate, small business goals) and, if rebutting a draft CPAR, the Assessing Official's draft ratin… |
| cpar_submission_mode | string | – | Submission mode under FAR 42.1503: Proactive Annual Self-Assessment Package, 14-Calendar-Day Draft CPAR Rebuttal to Reviewing Official, or Both (defaults to 'Proactive_Annual_CPARS_Self_Assessment_An… |
| target_far_42_1503_rating_goal | string | – | Target FAR 42.1503 Table 42-1 rating outcome across Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Small Business, and Regulatory Compliance (defaults to 'Upgrade_To_Exceptional_And_Very_Good_With_Posi… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cor_evidence_binder_checklist | array | – | Checklist of objective artifacts (CDRL acceptance receipts, monthly IPR slides, WAWF vouchers, eSRS confirmations, COR emails) to attach to the CPARS submission. |
| cpar_evaluation_overview | object | – | High-level FAR 42.1503 CPARS assessment, 14-day deadline rule, and rating upgrade feasibility. |
| far_42_1503_factor_by_factor_narratives | array | – | Factor-by-factor CPARS narratives mapped to FAR 42.1503 Table 42-1 across Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, and Small Business. |
| fourteen_day_reviewing_official_rebuttal_brief | object | – | Formal 14-Calendar-Day Reviewing Official rebuttal brief correcting factual errors and excusable Government delays. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_quality_assurance_qasp Generate GovCon Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP), PRS Table & PWS SLA/KPI Matrix ~568
Transform Performance Work Statement (PWS), Statement of Work (SOW), or Statement of Objectives (SOO) deliverables into a FAR Subpart 37.6 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) package containing a 0-100 QASP Readiness Score, an executive surveillance summary, a Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) Table (with PWS section reference, performance objective, measurable KPI standard, Acceptable Quality Level [AQL], FAR 46.4 surveillance method, monitoring frequency, positive/negative incentive or invoice deduction formula, and assigned COR/QA role), automated SLA/KPI telemetry metrics, a closed-loop Non-Conformance & Cure Notice Corrective Action Report (CAR) workflow with FAR 52.246 inspection citations, and a ready-to-submit QASP/QCP proposal narrative. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive quality engineering and proposal generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `pws_or_sow_deliverables_text` accepts 30 to 75,000 characters, while `contract_type_and_incentive_structure` and `surveillance_rigor_and_mission_criticality` calibrate AQL thresholds and incentive/deduction mechanics across FFP, T&M, CPAF, CPIF, and Hybrid IDIQ task orders). Use this tool when building a FAR 37.6 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP), Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) matrix, or Contractor Quality Control Plan (QCP) with AQLs and SLA deduction formulas; use `generate_compliance_matrix` instead to shred general Section C/L/M `shall`/`must` requirements into a proposal outline, or `generate_rfp_response` to draft general Technical Approach prose.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_type_and_incentive_structure | string | – | Contract type and fee structure ('Firm_Fixed_Price_FFP', 'Time_and_Materials_TM', 'Cost_Plus_Award_Fee_CPAF', 'Cost_Plus_Incentive_Fee_CPIF', or 'Hybrid_IDIQ_Task_Order'). |
| pws_or_sow_deliverables_text | string | yes | Raw Performance Work Statement (PWS), Statement of Work (SOW), or Statement of Objectives (SOO) tasks, service levels, and deliverable requirements (30 to 75,000 characters). |
| solicitation_or_contract_number | string | – | Optional solicitation or contract number for QASP traceability. |
| surveillance_rigor_and_mission_criticality | string | – | Mission criticality profile ('Mission_Critical_24x7_Zero_Trust', 'Standard_Enterprise_IT_SLA', or 'R_and_D_Agile_DevSecOps'). |
| target_agency | string | – | Optional issuing agency or contracting office. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| executive_surveillance_summary | string | – | Executive summary of the Performance-Based Acquisition (FAR 37.6) surveillance strategy, ISO 9001 / CMMI Level 3 quality governance, and COR partnership model. |
| non_conformance_and_cure_notice_workflow | object | – | Closed-loop Non-Conformance, Corrective Action Report (CAR), Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Corrective Action Plan (CAP), and FAR 52.246 inspection workflow. |
| performance_requirements_summary_prs_table | array | – | Structured FAR Subpart 37.6 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) matrix mapping PWS sections to objectives, standards, AQLs, surveillance methods, and incentive/deduction formulas. |
| qasp_readiness_score | integer | – | 0-100 score quantifying the measurability, FAR Subpart 37.6 compliance, and audit defensibility of the generated QASP and PRS matrix. |
| ready_to_submit_qasp_narrative | string | – | Complete, paste-ready Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) & Quality Control Plan (QCP) proposal volume narrative in Markdown. |
| sla_and_kpi_telemetry_metrics | array | – | Automated SLA and KPI telemetry metrics with target thresholds, measurement windows, data sources, and breach escalation triggers. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_rea_equitable_adjustment Generate FAR Part 43 REA, Constructive Change & Eichleay CDA Claim Package ~647
Analyze post-award scope creep, out-of-scope COR technical directions, Government-Furnished Equipment/Information (GFE/GFI) or ATO delays, and stop-work orders under FAR 52.243-1/2/3/4, FAR 52.242-14/15/17, and the Contract Disputes Act (41 U.S.C. 7101) to generate a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) or Certified CDA Claim package containing a 5-element constructive change proof, a DCAA-auditable Quantum Cost Schedule (direct labor, indirect burden, Eichleay unabsorbed home office overhead, FAR 31.205-33 allowable REA preparation costs, and DFARS 215.404-71 weighted guidelines profit), an Eichleay 3-step standby overhead and CPM schedule extension analysis, and verbatim DFARS 252.243-7002 and CDA 41 U.S.C. 7103 certifications. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive post-award contract claims and quantum analysis generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `contract_change_and_delay_facts` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `remedy_clause_and_submission_type` and `quantum_pricing_methodology` calibrate non-adversarial FAR Part 43 REAs vs. interest-bearing CDA claims). Use this tool when quantifying post-award constructive changes, Government delays, or Eichleay standby overhead for a Contracting Officer REA or CDA claim; use `analyze_debriefing_bid_protest` instead for pre-award or post-award GAO/COFC bid protests under FAR 15.506, or `generate_post_award_cpar_rebuttal` for FAR 42.1503 CPARS rating rebuttals.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_change_and_delay_facts | string | yes | Chronology of out-of-scope COR/CO technical directions, Government-furnished equipment/information (GFE/GFI) or ATO delays, stop-work orders, standby labor costs, and company overhead figures (20 to… |
| quantum_pricing_methodology | string | – | Quantum pricing method (Segregated Actual Costs, Modified Total Cost, Jury Verdict Method, Eichleay Unabsorbed Home Office Overhead, and FAR 31.205-33 REA Preparation Cost recovery; defaults to 'Segr… |
| remedy_clause_and_submission_type | string | – | Target remedy clause and submission posture (e.g., Non-Adversarial FAR Part 43 REA under FAR 52.243-1/2/3/4 & DFARS 252.243-7002 vs. Certified CDA Claim under 41 U.S.C. 7103; defaults to 'FAR_52_243_… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| eichleay_and_delay_schedule_analysis | object | – | Eichleay 3-step unabsorbed home office overhead calculation and Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule extension justification. |
| rea_entitlement_executive_overview | object | – | High-level REA vs. CDA legal posture, 5-element constructive change proof, and total recommended adjustment. |
| rea_quantum_cost_schedule | array | – | DCAA-auditable Quantum Cost Breakdown across direct labor, indirect pools, Eichleay standby overhead, REA preparation costs (FAR 31.205-33), and weighted guidelines profit. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| statutory_certification_and_notice_block | object | – | Verbatim DFARS 252.243-7002 REA and CDA 41 U.S.C. 7103 certifications, timely notice defense, and SF-30 reservation-of-rights language. |
No examples provided.
generate_rfp_response Draft Shipley Proposal Section & Vendor Clarification Q&A ~336
Draft an evaluator-ready Shipley proposal narrative (complete with Win Themes, Feature-Benefit-Proof blocks, and Risk Mitigations) AND a list of strategic Contracting Officer Clarification Q&A questions from an RFP section and company capabilities. This is a read-only, stateless composite generation call that always returns both the drafted narrative and the clarification questions in a single JSON payload (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `target_section_type` selects the proposal section format, and `tone_and_methodology` customizes the writing style). Use this tool when writing Technical Approach, Executive Summary, or Management Plan prose; use `generate_compliance_matrix` instead to build a requirement checklist/outline first, or `generate_cpars_past_performance` for structured Volume III CPARS contract citations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_context_and_capabilities | string | yes | Bidder's technical architecture, past performance metrics, SLAs, certifications, and competitive discriminators to weave into the narrative. |
| rfp_section_text | string | yes | Verbatim RFP Section C/PWS technical requirements, Section L instructions, or Section M evaluation criteria that the drafted proposal section must satisfy. |
| target_section_type | string | – | Type of proposal section to draft: 'technical_approach', 'executive_summary', 'management_and_staffing_plan', 'past_performance_narrative', or 'transition_and_quality_control'. |
| tone_and_methodology | string | – | Editorial voice and methodology instruction applied to the prose draft (defaults to 'Shipley Proposal Methodology (Active Voice, Evaluator-First, Feature-Benefit-Proof)'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| compliance_coverage_score | integer | – | Percentage (0-100) of input RFP requirements explicitly addressed in the drafted response. |
| drafted_subsections | array | – | Complete, multi-subsection Shipley proposal draft ready to paste into Word or proposal automation software. |
| estimated_word_count | integer | – | Total word count of the drafted narrative across all subsections. |
| executive_theme_statement | string | – | Overarching Shipley win-theme thesis statement for the entire proposal section. |
| feature_benefit_proof_matrix | array | – | Structured Feature-Benefit-Proof & competitive ghosting table for evaluator skimming. |
| red_team_evaluator_critique | string | – | Internal Red Team review note highlighting strengths of the draft and any remaining proof-point placeholders to verify before final submission. |
| section_title | string | – | Evaluator-focused title for the drafted proposal section. |
| strategic_clarification_questions | array | – | Formal Contracting Officer (KO) Q&A questions designed to neutralize competitor-wired specs and clarify scope risks. |
No examples provided.
generate_sbir_sttr_commercialization Generate SBIR / STTR Phase I–III Technical Work Plan, TRL Matrix & Commercialization Plan ~514
Convert R&D technical specifications and an SBIR/STTR solicitation topic description into a DoD/AFWERX/SpaceWERX/NSF SBIR/STTR Technical Work Plan, a TRL 1–9 progression matrix, a Phase III Dual-Use Commercialization & Transition Plan, and a pre-award DFARS 252.227-7018 / FAR 52.227-20 SBIR Data Rights assertion schedule. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive R&D proposal and IP compliance generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `sbir_sttr_topic_and_rd_specs` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters and `company_technology_and_ip_baseline` accepts 20 to 35,000 characters). Use this tool when preparing Phase I, Phase II, Direct-to-Phase II (AFWERX/SpaceWERX), or Phase III SBIR/STTR technical volumes, commercialization plans, and DFARS 252.227-7018 IP data-rights tables; use `generate_rfp_response` instead for standard FAR Part 15 technical approach volumes, or `scan_far_dfars_clauses` for general Section I clause flow-down audits.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_technology_and_ip_baseline | string | yes | Summary of the small business offeror's R&D technology, current TRL, Principal Investigator (PI) credentials, prior IRAD/patents, STTR university/lab partner (if applicable), and dual-use commercial… |
| sbir_sttr_topic_and_rd_specs | string | yes | Full or excerpted DoD, AFWERX, SPACEWERX, Navy, Army, DARPA, NSF, NASA, or DHS SBIR/STTR topic instructions, Phase I/II/III technical objectives, and evaluation criteria (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| sponsoring_agency_or_program | string | – | Optional sponsoring agency, PEO, or Phase III transition customer (e.g., USAF AFWERX / SpaceWERX, Office of Naval Research, NSF TIP). |
| target_phase_and_program | string | – | Target SBIR/STTR phase ('Phase_I_Feasibility_and_Proof_of_Concept', 'Direct_to_Phase_II_or_Phase_II_Prototype', 'Phase_IIB_or_STRATFI_TACFI_Matching', or 'Phase_III_Sole_Source_Transition_15_USC_638_… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dfars_252_227_7018_sbir_data_rights_assertions | array | – | Pre-populated DFARS 252.227-7018 / FAR 52.227-20 SBIR/STTR Data Rights Assertion Table protecting core IP for 20 years. |
| executive_technical_and_dual_use_summary | string | – | Executive summary of the R&D innovation, warfighter/agency operational impact, and commercial dual-use market thesis. |
| phase_iii_dual_use_commercialization_and_work_plan_narrative | string | – | Complete, paste-ready SBIR/STTR Volume 2 Technical Work Plan & Commercialization Plan narrative including Customer Memorandum (MOU) justification, TAM/SAM/SOM dual-use revenue forecast, and 15 U.S.C.… |
| recommended_phase_and_transition_pathway | string | – | Strategic SBIR/STTR pursuit and transition recommendation. |
| sbir_pwin_and_transition_readiness_score | integer | – | 0-100 score evaluating technical merit, TRL feasibility, dual-use commercialization potential, and Phase III Program-of-Record transition readiness. |
| trl_progression_and_technical_work_plan | array | – | Structured Phase I/II Technical Work Plan and TRL 1-9 progression milestones with quantifiable exit criteria. |
No examples provided.
generate_section_l_m_proposal_red_team_scorer SSEB Source Selection Simulator & Shipley Pink/Red/Gold Team Proposal Scorer ~509
Simulate a Government Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) under FAR 15.305, grading a draft proposal volume against RFP Section L/M into DoD Color/Adjectival Ratings (Blue/Outstanding to Red/Unacceptable) with exact Strengths, Weaknesses, Deficiencies, and page-level rewrites. Returns a strictly validated `RedTeamEvaluatorResponse` JSON object containing `sseb_consensus_evaluation_overview`, `factor_by_factor_color_and_risk_scorecard`, `sseb_strengths_weaknesses_deficiencies_and_rewrites`, and `competitive_range_and_gold_team_recovery_plan` grounded in FAR 15.305 (Proposal Evaluation), DoD Source Selection Procedures (DFARS PGI 215.3 — Blue/Purple/Green/Yellow/Red Consensus Grading), & Shipley Color Team Standards. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `rfp_section_l_m_and_draft_proposal_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `source_selection_grading_methodology` and `color_team_review_stage` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing SSEB Source Selection Simulator & Shipley Pink/Red/Gold Team Proposal Scorer workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| color_team_review_stage | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Red_Team_Full_SSEB_Simulation_With_Paste_Ready_Feature_Benefit_Proof_Upgrades_To_Blue_Outstanding'). |
| rfp_section_l_m_and_draft_proposal_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for SSEB Source Selection Simulator & Shipley Pink/Red/Gold Team Proposal Scorer (15 to 45,000 charact… |
| source_selection_grading_methodology | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'DoD_Source_Selection_Procedures_2022_Color_Adjectival_Blue_Purple_Green_Yellow_Red_And_FAR_15_305'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| competitive_range_and_gold_team_recovery_plan | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| factor_by_factor_color_and_risk_scorecard | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| sseb_consensus_evaluation_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| sseb_strengths_weaknesses_deficiencies_and_rewrites | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
No examples provided.
generate_small_business_participation Generate FAR 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan & eSRS Goals ~546
Calculate Small Business subcontracting dollar and percentage goals across SB, SDB/8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB, and HUBZone categories (under both % of Total Subcontracted Dollars and % of Total Contract Value baselines), draft all 15 mandatory elements of a FAR 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan and DFARS 252.219-7003 Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD), and structure eSRS.gov ISR/SSR reporting and FAR 52.219-16 Liquidated Damages good-faith effort controls. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive subcontracting compliance and goal calculator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `solicitation_subcontracting_and_clin_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters, while `plan_type_and_regulatory_regime` and `agency_socioeconomic_goal_benchmarks` calibrate Individual, Master, or Commercial Subcontracting Plans against DoD or Civilian SBA statutory targets). Use this tool when preparing a Large Business Prime FAR 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan, DFARS 252.219-7003 Small Business Participation Volume, or eSRS ISR/SSR goal calculation; use `generate_teaming_strategy` instead when a Small Business Prime needs a 13 CFR 125.6 (50% Rule) Limitations on Subcontracting workshare split, or `generate_sources_sought_response` for pre-RFP Rule-of-Two set-aside shaping.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agency_socioeconomic_goal_benchmarks | string | – | Agency statutory or RFP-mandated small business subcontracting goal percentages across SB, SDB/8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB, and HUBZone (defaults to 'DoD_23Pct_SB_5Pct_SDB_5Pct_WOSB_5Pct_SDVOSB_3Pct_HUBZone'). |
| plan_type_and_regulatory_regime | string | – | Subcontracting Plan structure: Individual Plan, Master Plan + Individual Goals, or Commercial Subcontracting Plan under FAR 52.219-9 / DFARS 252.219-7003 (defaults to 'Individual_Subcontracting_Plan_… |
| solicitation_subcontracting_and_clin_text | string | yes | Total contract ceiling, Base + Option period breakdown, total planned subcontracted dollars, RFP Section L/M Small Business Participation factor targets, and named subcontractor commitments (20 to 45… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dfars_small_business_participation_commitment_summary | array | – | Actionable checklist for DFARS 252.219-7003 Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) enforceability and bilateral teaming agreements. |
| esrs_isr_ssr_reporting_and_good_faith_effort_controls | object | – | eSRS.gov ISR/SSR reporting calendar, FAR 52.219-16 Liquidated Damages good-faith effort controls, and outreach procedures. |
| far_52_219_9_15_element_compliance_narratives | array | – | Drafted compliance narratives covering the 15 mandatory elements of FAR 52.219-9(d). |
| socioeconomic_category_goal_table | array | – | Socioeconomic subcontracting goal breakdown across SB, SDB/8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB, and HUBZone showing both % of subcontracted spend and % of total contract value. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| subcontracting_plan_overview | object | – | Executive summary and dual-baseline financial breakdown of total contract value vs. total subcontracted spend. |
No examples provided.
generate_sources_sought_response Generate GovCon Sources Sought, RFI & FAR 19.502-2 Set-Aside Shaping Response ~558
Analyze agency Sources Sought notices, Market Research RFIs, and Draft PWS/SOWs against a vendor's socioeconomic status (`8(a)`, `SDVOSB`, `HUBZone`, `WOSB/EDWOSB`, Small Business) and past performance to generate a persuasive FAR 19.502-2 Rule-of-Two set-aside justification, a 13 CFR 121.402 NAICS & SBA size standard shaping analysis, a requirement-by-requirement capability alignment matrix, Contracting Officer / OSDBU acquisition-shaping recommendations, and a ready-to-submit Sources Sought / RFI response narrative. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive capture shaping generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `sources_sought_or_rfi_notice_text` accepts 20 to 45,000 characters and `vendor_capability_and_socioeconomic_profile` accepts 20 to 35,000 characters). Use this tool during pre-RFP Market Research / Sources Sought / RFI phases to persuade the Contracting Officer to set aside an upcoming procurement for small business; use `match_capability_statement` instead for Gate-1 Bid/No-Bid Pwin scoring on an already-released RFP, or `generate_rfp_response` to draft final RFP proposal volumes. Use this tool when responding to pre-RFP Sources Sought notices or RFIs to lock in small-business set-asides under the FAR 19.502-2 Rule of Two; use `match_capability_statement` instead for full RFP Bid/No-Bid Pwin scoring, or `generate_rfp_response` for full proposal narrative drafting.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| sources_sought_or_rfi_notice_text | string | yes | Full text of the agency Sources Sought notice, Market Research RFI, SSN capability questions, or Draft PWS/SOW (20 to 45,000 characters). |
| target_set_aside_preference | string | – | Preferred FAR Part 19 set-aside pathway to justify to the Contracting Officer and OSDBU ('8a_Sole_Source_or_Competitive', 'SDVOSB_Set_Aside', 'HUBZone_Set_Aside', 'WOSB_EDWOSB_Set_Aside', 'Total_Smal… |
| vendor_capability_and_socioeconomic_profile | string | yes | Vendor socioeconomic designations (8(a), SDVOSB, HUBZone, WOSB/EDWOSB, Small Business), UEI/CAGE, GSA MAS / GWAC contract vehicles, facility clearances, and past performance (20 to 35,000 characters). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contracting_officer_shaping_questions_and_recommendations | array | – | Strategic recommendations for the Contracting Officer and Small Business Specialist (OSDBU) to shape the final RFP in the vendor's favor. |
| naics_psc_and_size_standard_shaping_analysis | string | – | Analysis of the posted NAICS/PSC code under 13 CFR 121.402, recommending either retention or a higher/more accurate SBA size standard. |
| ready_to_submit_sources_sought_response_narrative | string | – | Complete, paste-ready Sources Sought / RFI Response Narrative (Corporate Overview, Socioeconomic & Vehicle Eligibility, Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Acquisition Strategy Recommendation… |
| recommended_acquisition_strategy_and_set_aside | string | – | Recommended acquisition vehicle (GSA MAS, 8(a) STARS III, VETS 2, Polaris, Open Market) and FAR Part 19 set-aside determination. |
| requirement_capability_alignment_matrix | array | – | Requirement-by-requirement alignment table mapping agency RFI tasks to demonstrated prime capability and 13 CFR 125.6 workshare compliance. |
| rule_of_two_and_far_19_502_justification | string | – | Formal FAR 19.502-2 Rule-of-Two & FAR Part 10 market research justification proving two or more capable small businesses (or sole-source 8(a)/SDVOSB authority) exist at fair market prices. |
| set_aside_shaping_confidence_score | integer | – | 0-100 score indicating the strength of the vendor's case to persuade the Contracting Officer and OSDBU to set aside the procurement. |
No examples provided.
generate_state_local_cooperative_piggyback SLED Cooperative Purchasing (NASPO ValuePoint, Sourcewell, OMNIA, TIPS & DIR) Piggyback Mapper ~511
Evaluate state and municipal IT procurements to identify eligible NASPO ValuePoint, Sourcewell, OMNIA Partners, TIPS, TX DIR, and GSA Cooperative Purchasing (SIN 54151S/HACS) piggyback vehicles that bypass a 6-month competitive RFP. Returns a strictly validated `SledCoopPiggybackResponse` JSON object containing `sled_cooperative_piggyback_overview`, `eligible_cooperative_vehicles_matrix`, `participating_addendum_and_distributor_pathways`, and `statutory_interlocal_authority_and_cpo_memo` grounded in 40 U.S.C. § 502(c) (GSA Cooperative Purchasing for IT/Cyber SINs), ABA Model Procurement Code Article 10 (Intergovernmental Relations), & State Participating Addendum Statutes. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `sled_buyer_requirement_and_vendor_contracts_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `target_cooperative_portfolios` and `vendor_direct_vs_distributor_model` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing SLED Cooperative Purchasing (NASPO ValuePoint, Sourcewell, OMNIA, TIPS & DIR) Piggyback Mapper workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| sled_buyer_requirement_and_vendor_contracts_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for SLED Cooperative Purchasing (NASPO ValuePoint, Sourcewell, OMNIA, TIPS & DIR) Piggyback Mapper (15… |
| target_cooperative_portfolios | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'NASPO_ValuePoint_Cloud_AR2472_Sourcewell_OMNIA_Partners_TIPS_USA_TX_DIR_And_GSA_Coop_Purchasing'). |
| vendor_direct_vs_distributor_model | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Evaluate Both Direct Master Agreement Holdership and Carahsoft / TD SYNNEX / Ingram Micro Authorized Reselle… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| eligible_cooperative_vehicles_matrix | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| participating_addendum_and_distributor_pathways | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| sled_cooperative_piggyback_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| statutory_interlocal_authority_and_cpo_memo | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
No examples provided.
generate_teaming_strategy Generate 13 CFR 125.6 (50% Rule) Teaming & Subcontracting Plan ~448
Generate a legally compliant GovCon Teaming Strategy, a 13 CFR 125.6 & FAR 52.219-14 (Limitations on Subcontracting / 50% Rule) Prime/Sub workshare split, Ostensible Subcontractor risk audit, partner archetypes, FAR Subpart 9.6 Teaming Agreement clauses, and a BD outreach email. This is a read-only, stateless compliance and strategy generator (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `set_aside_type` enforces SBA workshare ceilings for 'sdvosb' [default], '8a', 'wosb_edwosb', 'hubzone', 'small_business', or 'full_and_open', while `bidder_role` tailors outputs for 'prime_seeking_subs' [default], 'sub_seeking_prime', or 'joint_venture_mentor_protege'). Use this tool when structuring Prime/Sub workshare splits or recruiting teaming partners to fill capability gaps; use `match_capability_statement` instead for an initial single-vendor Bid/No-Bid Pwin score.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bidder_capabilities | string | yes | Bidder's socioeconomic status, self-performed technical domains, clearance level, and past performance strengths. |
| bidder_role | string | – | Bidder's teaming posture: 'prime_seeking_subs' (default, allocates >=50% to Prime and defines sub gap archetypes), 'sub_seeking_prime' (positions bidder for 20-49% specialty workshare), or 'joint_ven… |
| rfp_text | string | yes | Raw RFP scope, PWS task areas, contract ceiling, security clearance requirements, and FAR 52.219-14 / set-aside instructions. |
| set_aside_type | string | – | Solicitation set-aside designation ('sdvosb' [default], '8a', 'wosb_edwosb', 'hubzone', 'small_business', or 'full_and_open') used to enforce 13 CFR 125.6 similarly situated entity and 50% self-perfo… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability_gaps_and_partner_archetypes | array | – | Itemized capability gaps identified in the RFP and the exact partner profiles needed to close them. |
| executive_teaming_rationale | string | – | Strategic Shipley capture rationale explaining how this teaming structure maximizes Pwin while maintaining strict SBA/FAR compliance. |
| limitations_on_subcontracting_audit | object | – | Automated audit of the workshare split under 13 CFR § 125.6 and FAR 52.219-14 (50% Rule & Ostensible Subcontractor test). |
| partner_outreach_email_template | string | – | Ready-to-send Business Development outreach email to recruit the target Prime or Subcontractor partner. |
| recommended_teaming_structure | string | – | High-level recommended teaming architecture (e.g., 'SDVOSB Prime (58% Workshare) + 1 Similarly Situated SDVOSB Sub (22%) + 1 Large Business Niche Sub (20%)'). |
| solicitation_title | string | – | Inferred solicitation title, agency, and set-aside designation. |
| teaming_agreement_clauses | array | – | Ready-to-paste FAR Subpart 9.6 Teaming Agreement clauses (Exhibit A Workshare, Exclusivity, Pass-Through Subcontract Conversion). |
No examples provided.
generate_termination_for_convenience_settlement FAR Part 49 Termination for Convenience (T4C / SF 1435–1438) Settlement Proposal Calculator ~545
Compute recoverable sunk costs, subcontractor termination claims, settlement expenses, and profit on work performed under FAR Part 49 and FAR 52.249-2, generating an Inventory Basis (SF 1435) or Total Cost Basis (SF 1436) T4C Settlement Proposal. Returns a strictly validated `T4cSettlementResponse` JSON object containing `t4c_settlement_executive_overview`, `sf_1435_1436_recoverable_quantum_schedule`, `subcontractor_settlement_and_sf_1428_inventory_schedule`, and `far_31_205_42_allowability_and_one_year_filing_clock` grounded in FAR Part 49, FAR 52.249-2 (Termination for Convenience of the Government), FAR 31.205-42 (Termination Costs), & Standard Forms 1435 / 1436 / 1437 / 1438 / 1428. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `termination_notice_and_incurred_cost_ledger_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `settlement_proposal_basis_and_form` and `contract_type_and_clause_regime` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing FAR Part 49 Termination for Convenience (T4C / SF 1435–1438) Settlement Proposal Calculator workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_type_and_clause_regime | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'FAR 52.249-2 Fixed-Price Termination for Convenience (vs. FAR 52.249-6 Cost-Reimbursement / FAR 52.212-4(l)… |
| settlement_proposal_basis_and_form | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'SF_1435_Inventory_Basis_Preferred_Under_FAR_49_206_2_vs_SF_1436_Total_Cost_Basis'). |
| termination_notice_and_incurred_cost_ledger_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for FAR Part 49 Termination for Convenience (T4C / SF 1435–1438) Settlement Proposal Calculator (15 to… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| far_31_205_42_allowability_and_one_year_filing_clock | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| sf_1435_1436_recoverable_quantum_schedule | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| subcontractor_settlement_and_sf_1428_inventory_schedule | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| t4c_settlement_executive_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
No examples provided.
generate_value_engineering_vecp FAR Part 48 Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP / FAR 52.248-1) & Shared-Savings Modeler ~528
Transform cloud FinOps, AI automation, or architecture optimizations on an active contract into a formal FAR 52.248-1 Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP), calculating Instant/Concurrent/Future acquisition savings and the contractor's 50%–75% shared-savings royalty. Returns a strictly validated `VecpFar48Response` JSON object containing `vecp_shared_savings_overview`, `instant_concurrent_and_future_savings_table`, `far_52_248_1_c_eight_element_proposal_package`, and `collateral_savings_and_data_rights_protection` grounded in FAR Part 48 (Value Engineering) & FAR 52.248-1(c)–(i) (50%/50% to 75%/25% Voluntary VECP Incentive Sharing & 36–60 Month Future Acquisition Royalty). This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive GovCon compliance and capture analysis call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key or X-SignalTender-Key; `baseline_contract_and_proposed_engineering_change_text` accepts 15 to 45,000 characters, while `far_part_48_sharing_regime` and `development_and_government_implementation_costs` calibrate the regulatory regime and threshold assumptions). Use this tool when executing FAR Part 48 Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP / FAR 52.248-1) & Shared-Savings Modeler workflows; use `scan_far_dfars_clauses` instead for general FAR/DFARS clause flow-down audits, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for general Section L/M 'shall' requirement extraction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_contract_and_proposed_engineering_change_text | string | yes | Primary solicitation text, clause excerpts, deliverable schedule, or technical/financial context for FAR Part 48 Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP / FAR 52.248-1) & Shared-Savings Modeler (15 t… |
| development_and_government_implementation_costs | string | – | Operational context, threshold parameters, or compliance posture assumptions (defaults to 'Contractor VECP Development Cost: $320,000 | Government Test/ECP Implementation Cost: $180,000 | 36-Month Sh… |
| far_part_48_sharing_regime | string | – | Target regulatory regime, statutory authority, or evaluation framework (defaults to 'FAR_52_248_1_Voluntary_Incentive_Fixed_Price_50_50_To_75_25_Contractor_Share'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| collateral_savings_and_data_rights_protection | object | – | Statutory governance protocol and actionable submission verification checklist. |
| far_52_248_1_c_eight_element_proposal_package | array | – | Paste-ready compliance narratives, control specifications, or submission sections. |
| instant_concurrent_and_future_savings_table | array | – | Structured line-by-line regulatory audit, classification, or quantitative schedule rows. |
| status | string | – | Execution status ('success'). |
| vecp_shared_savings_overview | object | – | Executive determination overview, regulatory citations, and readiness score. |
No examples provided.
get_live_solicitations Get Live Open Federal & State SLED RFPs ~622
Retrieve currently open, AI-vetted Federal (SAM.gov) and All-50-State SLED (VA, TX, CA, FL, MD, IL, PA, OH, GA, NC, NY, MA, NJ, WA, MI, CO, AZ, MN, TN, IN, MO, WI, SC, OR, CT, UT, NV, AL, LA, KY, OK, IA, KS, AR, MS, NM, NE, ID, HI, NH, ME, RI, MT, DE, SD, ND, AK, VT, WV, WY, DemandStar) IT, Cloud, and Cybersecurity solicitations from SignalTender's 52-portal procurement database. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive live database query (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; all four filter parameters are optional and combinable, returning up to `limit` [default 10, max 50] active solicitations whose closing dates have not passed). Use this tool when discovering active open RFPs to bid on right now; use `search_historical_awards` instead for past awarded contracts and incumbent pricing, or `match_capability_statement` once you have selected an RFP to score Bid/No-Bid Pwin.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Optional technology vertical filter ('cybersecurity', 'cloud-infrastructure', 'software-development', or 'network-telecom'). |
| closing_after | string | – | Return only solicitations closing on or after this ISO 8601 date (YYYY-MM-DD). |
| keyword | string | – | Optional case-insensitive substring keyword matched against solicitation title and issuing buyer agency. |
| limit | integer | – | Maximum number of open solicitations to return per request (integer between 1 and 50; defaults to 10). |
| state | string | – | Filter by portal jurisdiction: 'federal', 'texas', 'virginia', 'california', 'florida', 'maryland', 'illinois', 'pennsylvania', 'ohio', 'georgia', 'north_carolina', 'new_york', 'massachusetts', 'new_… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| filters_applied | object | – | Echoed query filter parameters. |
| portals_monitored | integer | – | Number of Federal, State SLED, and Municipal procurement portals indexed. |
| solicitations | array | – | List of verified open IT, cloud, software, and cybersecurity solicitations. |
| total_count | integer | – | Total number of matching open solicitations returned. |
No examples provided.
match_capability_statement Score Bid/No-Bid Pwin & Match Capability Statement ~312
Evaluate an RFP scope against a vendor's Capability Statement and past performance to compute a 0-100 Probability of Win (Pwin) score, a Gate-1 Bid/No-Bid recommendation, a technical/socioeconomic gap analysis, and a tailored executive pitch. This is a read-only, stateless capture scoring call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; both `rfp_text` and `company_capability_statement` are required, while `target_pursuit_role` weights eligibility rules for 'prime_contractor', 'subcontractor_or_jv', or 'either_prime_or_sub' [default]). Use this tool when conducting Gate-1 capture qualification to decide whether to bid an opportunity; use `generate_teaming_strategy` instead if you already decided to bid and need a 13 CFR 125.6 (50% Rule) Prime/Sub workshare plan, or `match_key_personnel` to evaluate individual candidate resumes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_capability_statement | string | yes | Vendor capability statement including core competencies, socioeconomic certifications (8(a), SDVOSB, WOSB, HUBZone), facility clearances, and past performance summary. |
| rfp_text | string | yes | Target solicitation scope, mandatory technical qualifications, NAICS/set-aside designation, clearance requirements, and Section M evaluation criteria. |
| target_pursuit_role | string | – | Preferred pursuit posture to evaluate: 'prime_contractor', 'subcontractor_or_jv', or 'either_prime_or_sub'. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bid_recommendation | string | – | Executive gate decision: STRONG_BID, CONDITIONAL_BID_TEAMING_REQUIRED, HIGH_RISK_STRETCH_BID, or NO_BID. |
| hard_disqualifiers_detected | array | – | Mandatory knockout blockers detected (e.g., missing Top Secret FCL, ineligible socioeconomic status, missing required contract vehicle). |
| key_discriminators | array | – | High-impact competitive strengths from the vendor profile to highlight as Shipley win themes. |
| pwin_score | integer | – | Estimated Probability of Win (Pwin) score from 0 (disqualified / no fit) to 100 (ideal prime fit). |
| recommended_pursuit_role | string | – | Optimal pursuit structure (e.g., 'Prime Contractor', 'Prime with Teaming Subcontractor for Top Secret FCL', 'Subcontractor to Large Prime'). |
| requirement_gap_analysis | array | – | Requirement-by-requirement alignment matrix with matched vendor evidence and gap remediation actions. |
| score_breakdown | object | – | Granular 0-100 scoring across technical fit, past performance, clearances/certifications, and set-aside/vehicle eligibility. |
| solicitation_title | string | – | Identified or inferred title and agency of the solicitation. |
| tailored_executive_summary_pitch | string | – | Ready-to-paste, persuasive Shipley Executive Summary / Sources Sought pitch paragraph tailored to the buyer agency using the vendor's exact past performance. |
| teaming_and_subcontracting_strategy | string | – | Concrete recommendation on how to structure the capture team, JV, or subcontractor roster to maximize Pwin. |
No examples provided.
match_key_personnel Audit Key Personnel LCAT Qualifications & Tailor Shipley Resume + LOC ~357
Evaluate a candidate's resume against RFP Section L/M Key Personnel and GSA MAS / OASIS+ / Alliant 3 Labor Category (LCAT) requirements (years of experience, education, security clearance, DoD 8570/8140 certifications), rewrite relevant roles into a Shipley Key Personnel bio, and generate a ready-to-sign Letter of Commitment (LOC). This is a read-only, stateless qualification audit and resume formatter that does not store candidate PII (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `allow_education_experience_substitution` [default true] applies standard federal GSA/OPM equivalency rules such as Bachelor's + 4 years = Master's when scoring eligibility). Use this tool when qualifying and formatting individual Key Personnel resumes for a proposal; use `match_capability_statement` instead to score overall company-level Bid/No-Bid Pwin, or `generate_cpars_past_performance` for company-level contract citations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| allow_education_experience_substitution | boolean | – | When true (default), applies standard federal GSA/OPM degree-for-experience substitution rules (e.g., Bachelor's + 4 additional years of specialized experience satisfies a Master's requirement) unles… |
| candidate_resume_text | string | yes | Candidate's unstructured resume or CV including education degrees, active security clearances, professional certifications (CISSP, PMP, AWS, etc.), and chronological work history. |
| lcat_or_rfp_requirements | string | yes | Raw RFP Section L/M Key Personnel instructions, GSA MAS / GWAC Labor Category (LCAT) minimum qualifications, required security clearance, and mandatory DoD 8570/8140 certifications. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lcat_compliance_audit | object | – | Granular verification of years of experience, degree equivalency, security clearance, and DoD 8570/8140 certifications. |
| overall_qualification_score | integer | – | Quantitative Key Personnel & LCAT qualification score (0-100). |
| qualification_verdict | string | – | Audit verdict: 'FULLY_QUALIFIED_COMPLIANT', 'QUALIFIED_VIA_SUBSTITUTION', 'WAIVER_OR_CERT_PENDING', or 'DISQUALIFIED_HARD_KNOCKOUT'. |
| requirement_by_requirement_matrix | array | – | Line-by-line compliance checklist mapping each RFP Key Personnel mandate to candidate resume evidence. |
| tailored_shipley_resume_profile | object | – | Proposal-ready Shipley Key Personnel bio, rewritten past-performance bullets, and ready-to-sign Letter of Commitment (LOC). |
| target_lcat_title | string | – | Normalized Labor Category (LCAT) and Key Personnel role title extracted from the solicitation. |
No examples provided.
parse_b2b_contract Parse B2B Contract & RFP Metadata ~270
Extract structured contract metadata (contracting parties, effective and termination dates, total contract value, payment terms, key deliverables, security clearances, and governing law) from unstructured B2B contracts, Statements of Work (SOWs), or RFPs into normalized JSON. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive extraction call (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; accepts 50 to 100,000 characters in `raw_text`, and `document_type_hint` optionally biases extraction rules toward federal RFP, MSA, SOW, or NDA conventions). Use this tool when you need general commercial or header metadata from a contract; use `extract_pricing_schedule` instead for line-by-line CLIN/rate-card tables, `audit_contract_risks` for toxic clause redlining, or `generate_compliance_matrix` for Section C/L/M requirement shredding.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| document_type_hint | string | – | Optional document type hint (e.g., 'RFP', 'MSA', 'SOW'). |
| raw_text | string | yes | Raw unstructured text from a B2B contract, Master Services Agreement (MSA), Statement of Work (SOW), or Request for Proposal (RFP) between 50 and 100,000 characters. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| buyer_entity | string | – | The organization, government authority, or enterprise issuing the RFP, tender, or legal contract. |
| is_awarded | boolean | – | A boolean indicating if this document is a past award (True) or an active, open bid/solicitation (False). |
| key_deliverables | array | – | A list of the main project deliverables, milestones, goods, or work products required. |
| submission_deadline | string|null | – | The exact deadline for submission in ISO 8601 format (e.g., 'YYYY-MM-DD' or 'YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ'). Must be None if missing. |
| total_budget_usd | number|null | – | The stated budget, maximum contract value, or total fee in USD. Must be None if no explicit financial figure is mentioned. |
| vendor_requirements | array | – | A list of strict technical, security, licensing, or compliance qualifications required from the vendor. |
No examples provided.
scan_far_dfars_clauses Scan FAR / DFARS & CMMC Regulatory Flow-Down Clauses ~360
Scan solicitation Section I or subcontract flow-down text to identify every FAR (`52.2xx`) and DFARS (`252.2xx`) clause, flag mandatory subcontractor flow-downs, and score CMMC 2.0, NIST SP 800-171, and FedRAMP compliance burden. This is a read-only, stateless regulatory audit (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; `raw_text` accepts 30 to 100,000 characters, and `contractor_role` adjusts risk severity and flow-down obligations for a 'prime_contractor' [default], 'subcontractor', or 'commercial_item_vendor' under FAR Part 12). Use this tool when performing federal acquisition regulation (FAR/DFARS/CMMC) clause compliance; use `audit_contract_risks` instead for commercial MSA/NDA legal redlining, or `answer_security_questionnaire` to draft control-by-control NIST 800-171 / SOC 2 questionnaire responses.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contractor_role | string | – | Bidder's contracting tier: 'prime_contractor' (evaluates full agency compliance and outbound flow-down duties), 'subcontractor' (flags over-broad prime flow-downs), or 'commercial_item_vendor' (filte… |
| handles_cui_or_cdi | boolean | – | Whether the contractor will store, process, or transmit Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) or Covered Defense Information (CDI). |
| raw_text | string | yes | Solicitation Section I, contract clause list, or subcontract agreement text containing FAR (`52.2xx`) or DFARS (`252.2xx`) citations (30 to 100,000 characters). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| compliance_burden_level | string | – | Categorical compliance burden level (LOW, MODERATE, HIGH, EXTREME_DEFENSE_GRADE). |
| contractor_role_evaluated | string | – | The contractor role perspective used for the audit. |
| cyber_compliance_profile | object | – | Structured CMMC 2.0, NIST SP 800-171, FedRAMP, and cyber incident reporting requirements. |
| detected_clauses | array | – | Detailed breakdown of every FAR/DFARS/supplement clause found, with severity, flow-down status, and remediation advice. |
| ip_and_data_rights_warnings | array | – | Specific warnings regarding Government Unlimited Rights, GPR, computer software rights (FAR 52.227 / DFARS 252.227), or patent traps. |
| mandatory_flowdown_count | integer | – | Number of detected clauses that carry mandatory subcontractor flow-down obligations. |
| overall_compliance_burden_score | integer | – | Overall regulatory and cybersecurity compliance burden score from 0 (minimal commercial burden) to 100 (extreme defense/CMMC/IP burden). |
| priority_compliance_actions | array | – | Ordered checklist of immediate pre-proposal actions (e.g., SPRS score verification, CMMC assessment, IP assertion table in Section K/L). |
| solicitation_summary | string | – | Concise executive summary of the regulatory posture, agency context, and contract vehicle. |
| total_clauses_detected | integer | – | Total number of FAR, DFARS, and agency supplement clauses identified. |
No examples provided.
search_historical_awards Search Historical Federal Contract Awards & CLIN Pricing ~310
Query historical federal contract awards, incumbent prime contractors, award ceilings, and labor/CLIN pricing benchmarks filtered by keyword, agency, or 6-digit NAICS code. This is a read-only, stateless, non-destructive database query (requires X-RapidAPI-Key; all filter parameters are optional and combinable, returning up to `limit` [default 20, max 100] matching historical awards per call). Use this tool when researching past award prices, incumbent vendors, or Price-to-Win (PTW) benchmarks; use `get_live_solicitations` instead to find currently open RFPs available for bidding, or `classify_naics_psc_nigp` if you need to discover the right NAICS code first.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agency | string | – | Optional issuing federal or state agency name substring filter (e.g., 'Department of Defense', 'Veterans Affairs'). |
| keywords | string | – | Required technical or domain search keywords matched against award descriptions and CLIN titles (e.g., 'zero trust', 'cloud migration', 'SIEM'). |
| limit | integer | – | Maximum number of award records to return. |
| max_amount_usd | number | – | Maximum award amount in USD. |
| min_amount_usd | number | – | Minimum award amount in USD. |
| naics_code | string | – | Optional exact 6-digit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code filter (e.g., '541512' for Computer Systems Design). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string|null | – | Echoed query parameter or filter criteria. |
| results | array | – | List of standardized award records with line items. |
| total_count | integer | – | Total number of matching award records found. |
No examples provided.
How do I install the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server is a hosted endpoint at https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com
claude mcp add --transport http aarbchen-signaltender-mcp 'https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp'
What is the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.aarbchen/signaltender-mcp. B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP server for live RFPs, contract parsing, compliance & proposal tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://b2b-contract-parser-api.onrender.com/mcp).
Is the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server safe to use?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server expose?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server exposes 58 tools: parse_b2b_contract, audit_contract_risks, search_historical_awards, get_live_solicitations, generate_compliance_matrix, and 53 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 29,405 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server require authentication?
No. We connected to SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server still maintained?
SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on SignalTender B2B, GovCon & LegalTech MCP Server, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.