Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ZizkaDB

PYPI · ZIZKADB-MCP

Causal memory and tamper-evident audit log for AI agents: log, why, search, time travel.

Available components

67 Trust /100

Last scanned (17 hours ago)

Scores higher than 63% of PyPI servers

Category Memory and Knowledge

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 0 of 28 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency48
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1437 tokens (~110/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (8% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 31 Oct 26 52

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/zizkadb-mcp@0.1.12

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted setuptools.build_meta

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 28 packages
Packages resolved 28
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~1,437 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
forget ~120

Delete all events matching a filter (GDPR right to erasure). Removes events from both the database and the vector index. Commonly used to delete all data for a specific user on request. Args: filter_key: Field in event data to match (e.g. "user_id", "email", "session_id") filter_value: Value to match (e.g. "user_123", "alice@example.com") Returns: deleted_events count

NameTypeReqDescription
filter_keystringyes–
filter_valuestringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_baseline ~40

Behavioral baseline and drift score for an agent.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–
recent_windowinteger––
windowstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_context ~205

Get a formatted memory context block ready to inject into a system prompt. This is the drop-in replacement for LLM-provided memory (Claude Projects, ChatGPT memory). It combines recent events with semantically relevant past events, fits within a token budget, and formats as plain text. Typical usage: context = await get_context("support-bot", "user asking about billing") system_prompt = f"You are a support agent.\n\n{context}" Args: agent: Your agent identifier task: What the agent is about to do (guides semantic retrieval) max_tokens: Token budget for the context block (default 2000) session_id: Current session ID to exclude from context (optional) Returns: Formatted context string -- paste directly into your system prompt

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–
max_tokensinteger––
session_idstring––
taskstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

get_token_optimization ~51

Deterministic token optimization suggestions from real usage events.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–
from_string––
granularitystring––
tostring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_token_usage ~52

Token usage and cost report for an agent over a date range.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–
from_stringyes–
granularitystring––
tostringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

log_event ~225

Log an event to ZizkaDB. Use this every time your agent takes an action: a tool call, a decision, a user message, or an agent response. Logging builds the causal graph that powers why(), search_memory(), and get_context(). Args: agent: Unique identifier for your agent (e.g. "support-bot"): letters, numbers, dots, dashes and underscores, starting with a letter or number event: What happened (e.g. "tool_call", "user_message", "decision") data: Any dict of relevant data (tool name, query, result, etc.) session_id: Groups related events into a session (optional) parent_id: event_id of the event that caused this one -- enables causal lineage (optional) Returns: event_id, timestamp, sequence_no, checksum

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–
dataobjectyes–
eventstringyes–
parent_idstring––
session_idstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

memory_diff ~96

Summarise what happened in a session. Returns event counts, types seen, causal depth, whether any errors occurred, and event types that had never appeared in prior sessions. Call this at the end of a session to understand what changed. Args: session_id: The session to analyse Returns: summary, event_types, total_events, has_errors, new_event_types

NameTypeReqDescription
session_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

query_events ~96

List recent events for an agent. Args: agent: Agent identifier to query limit: Number of events to return (default 20) event_type: Filter by event type, e.g. "tool_call" (optional) Returns: List of events ordered by time (most recent first)

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–
event_typestring––
limitinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

reset_log_chain ~23

Start a fresh causal chain (new session_id, clear parent_id).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_memory ~172

Search over all logged agent events. Finds past decisions, tool calls, conversations, or any event. Works on any server: keyword search without embeddings, keyword + meaning (hybrid) with them. Useful before a new task to see what happened in similar situations. Args: query: Natural language description of what you're looking for agent: Filter to a specific agent (optional -- leave blank to search all) limit: Number of results (default 10, max 50) mode: Leave blank for the server default, or "keyword", "semantic", "hybrid" Returns: List of matching events with relevance scores

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstring––
limitinteger––
modestring––
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

time_travel ~128

Replay the exact state of an agent at a specific point in time. Reconstructs what the agent knew and had done up to that moment. Useful for investigating complaints ("what did the agent tell them at 3pm?") or comparing behaviour across versions. Args: agent: Agent identifier timestamp: ISO 8601 datetime, e.g. "2026-05-10T15:00:00Z" Returns: Agent state snapshot at that moment (events, summary, last_event)

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–
timestampstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_chain ~114

Prove an agent's history is untouched. Rechecks every event's checksum and its link in the agent's hash chain. "intact": true means no event was edited, removed or reordered (GDPR deletions show up as tombstones, not breaks). Keep "chain_head" as proof of the history at this moment. Args: agent: The agent whose history to check Returns: intact, a summary, any problems found, and chain_head

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

why ~115

Trace the causal chain that led to an event. Given any event ID, walks back through parent_id links to reconstruct the full decision tree: user message -> tool call -> result -> response. Essential for debugging why an agent did something unexpected. Args: event_id: The event you want to explain depth: How many levels back to trace (default 10) Returns: Ordered list of events from root cause to the specified event

NameTypeReqDescription
depthinteger––
event_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ZizkaDB MCP server?

ZizkaDB runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx zizkadb-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · zizkadb-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add zizka-ai-sl-zizkadb-mcp -- uvx zizkadb-mcp
Common questions

What is the ZizkaDB MCP server?

ZizkaDB is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.ZIZKA-AI-SL/zizkadb-mcp. Causal memory and tamper-evident audit log for AI agents: log, why, search, time travel. This page covers its PyPI package (zizkadb-mcp).

Is the ZizkaDB MCP server safe to use?

ZizkaDB scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ZizkaDB MCP server expose?

ZizkaDB exposes 13 tools: log_event, reset_log_chain, search_memory, verify_chain, get_context, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,437 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the ZizkaDB MCP server still maintained?

ZizkaDB is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the ZizkaDB MCP server under?

ZizkaDB declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.