listme.name rankings
REMOTE · LISTME.NAME
Read-only ranked lists, product facts, alternatives and comparisons for software, apps and books.
Available components
Last scanned (17 hours ago)
Scores higher than 81% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Search and Retrieval
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 583 tokens (~97/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
- Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage93
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 79% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://listme.name/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=listme.name | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 9 Oct 2026 | 7 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 62200ab30e205de56f99694435d04649efe |
| SANs: *.listme.name, listme.name | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of listme.name. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| name. | present | 34927 | 13 | Verified |
| listme.name. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com 'sha256-PoUatQm4zdJKHanLHfxDhQoDCi/cDTL/1Baf2S5mTYQ='; style-src 'self'; style-src-attr 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.googletagmanager.com; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://*.googletagmanager.com; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=(), usb=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://listme.name/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://listme.name/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://listme.name/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_products Compare two products ~56
Two products side by side: facts, plain-language differences, and the rank, score and verdict each gets in every ranking both appear in.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | string | yes | First product slug. |
| b | string | yes | Second product slug. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_alternatives Find alternatives ~101
Products that share a ranking with the given one, best first, with why each is worth considering. Can be restricted to free, open-source or a platform.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| free_only | boolean | – | Only products with a free plan or free version. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| open_source_only | boolean | – | – |
| platform | string | – | Require official support for this platform. |
| product | string | yes | Product slug to find alternatives to. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_product Get a product ~54
Facts about one product or book: pricing model, platforms, open-source status, strengths, limits, every ranking it appears in and its top alternatives.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| product | string | yes | Product slug, from search_catalog or a ranking. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_ranking Get a ranking ~118
One ranked list (for example password-managers): criteria, how to choose, and every entry with rank, editorial score (0-100), verdict, best-for and key facts. Optionally narrowed by a filter such as free, open-source, linux.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| filter | string | – | Optional: free, open-source, a platform (windows, macos, linux, ios, android, web) or a book format (pdf, epub, kindle). |
| list | string | yes | List slug, from list_rankings or search_catalog. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_rankings List rankings ~50
Without arguments: every category with its list count. With a category slug: that category's ranked lists and their top picks.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Optional category slug, for example security-privacy. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_catalog Search listme.name ~83
Find rankings, products, books, categories and articles by name or topic. Returns slugs to pass to the other tools, and page URLs to cite.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | What to look for, for example "password manager" or "Notion alternatives". |
| type | string | – | Optional: only this kind of result. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the listme.name rankings MCP server?
listme.name rankings is a hosted endpoint at https://listme.name/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · listme.name
claude mcp add --transport http yunusemrejr-listme 'https://listme.name/mcp'
What is the listme.name rankings MCP server?
listme.name rankings is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.yunusemrejr/listme. Read-only ranked lists, product facts, alternatives and comparisons for software, apps and books. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://listme.name/mcp).
Is the listme.name rankings MCP server safe to use?
listme.name rankings scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the listme.name rankings MCP server expose?
listme.name rankings exposes 6 tools: search_catalog, list_rankings, get_ranking, get_product, find_alternatives, compare_products. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 462 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the listme.name rankings MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to listme.name rankings without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the listme.name rankings MCP server still maintained?
listme.name rankings is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.