MCP Greeting Server
OCI · GHCR.IO/YOTAMFREUND-ENG/MCP-GREETING-SERVER:LATEST
MCP server providing personalized greetings with AI-powered tools using Spring Boot and Spring AI
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 68% of OCI servers
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency18
- Repository check failed: no source repository is declared. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 258 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 152 tokens (~50/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 31 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 23 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 22 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 16 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/yotamfreund-eng/mcp-greeting-server:latest
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
casual_greeting ~30
Generate a casual, informal greeting
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | The name of the person to greet |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
farewell ~50
Generate a farewell message with different styles
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | The name of the person to bid farewell to |
| style | string | – | The farewell style: formal, casual, friendly, or professional |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
greet ~72
Generate a personalized greeting message with different styles
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | The language for the greeting: english, spanish, or french (default: english) |
| name | string | yes | The name of the person to greet |
| style | string | – | The greeting style: formal, casual, friendly, or professional |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the MCP Greeting Server server?
MCP Greeting Server runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/yotamfreund-eng/mcp-greeting-server:latest. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/yotamfreund-eng/mcp-greeting-server:latest
claude mcp add yotamfreund-eng-greeting -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/yotamfreund-eng/mcp-greeting-server:latest
What is the MCP Greeting Server server?
MCP Greeting Server is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.yotamfreund-eng/greeting. MCP server providing personalized greetings with AI-powered tools using Spring Boot and Spring AI. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/yotamfreund-eng/mcp-greeting-server:latest).
Is the MCP Greeting Server server safe to use?
MCP Greeting Server scores 47 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the MCP Greeting Server server expose?
MCP Greeting Server exposes 3 tools: casual_greeting, farewell, greet. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 152 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the MCP Greeting Server server still maintained?
MCP Greeting Server is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the MCP Greeting Server server under?
MCP Greeting Server declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.