Hyperliquid Funding
NPM · HYPERLIQUID-FUNDING-MCP · SCANNED SEP 21
Hyperliquid funding, open interest and carry spreads across all 11 venues. Paid per call, x402.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 32 of 97 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
- Repository check failed: no source repository is declared. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
- Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 302 tokens (~75/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the Hyperliquid Funding MCP server?
Hyperliquid Funding runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y hyperliquid-funding-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · hyperliquid-funding-mcp
claude mcp add xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp -- npx -y hyperliquid-funding-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"hyperliquid-funding-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"hyperliquid-funding-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp -- npx -y hyperliquid-funding-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"hyperliquid-funding-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg hyperliquid-funding-mcp
mcp_servers:
xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "hyperliquid-funding-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"hyperliquid-funding-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y hyperliquid-funding-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"xyz-honeycheck-hyperliquid-funding-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"hyperliquid-funding-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 65
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/hyperliquid-funding-mcp@1.0.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 97 packages
| Packages resolved | 97 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
hyperliquid_asset ~74
One asset across every Hyperliquid venue that lists it: funding, open interest, mark and premium per venue, plus the top-of-book imbalance, which is the only signal here that says which side is crowded. Paid per call.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| coin | string | yes | The asset symbol, for example BTC or NVDA. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
hyperliquid_builder_fees ~45
What each Hyperliquid builder actually charges, measured from their own published fills: fills, notional, fee taken and the effective rate in basis points. Free.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
hyperliquid_carry_spreads ~106
The widest funding-rate spreads between Hyperliquid venues right now. The same asset funds at different rates on the native exchange and on builder-deployed venues, and no single Hyperliquid call sees two venues, so this gap cannot be read from the exchange directly. Floored by open interest so every row is tradeable. Call this before opening a funding carry. Paid per call.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | How many, widest first. Default 10. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
hyperliquid_funding_board ~77
Funding, open interest in dollars and premium for every perp on Hyperliquid across all eleven venues at once, sampled every few minutes. Hyperliquid answers one venue per call; this is all of them. Paid per call.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | How many assets, largest open interest first. Default 15. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Hyperliquid Funding MCP server?
Hyperliquid Funding is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as xyz.honeycheck/hyperliquid-funding-mcp. Hyperliquid funding, open interest and carry spreads across all 11 venues. Paid per call, x402. This page covers its npm package (hyperliquid-funding-mcp).
Is the Hyperliquid Funding MCP server safe to use?
Hyperliquid Funding scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 21 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Hyperliquid Funding MCP server expose?
Hyperliquid Funding exposes 4 tools: hyperliquid_carry_spreads, hyperliquid_funding_board, hyperliquid_asset, hyperliquid_builder_fees. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 302 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Hyperliquid Funding MCP server still maintained?
Hyperliquid Funding is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Hyperliquid Funding MCP server under?
Hyperliquid Funding declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.