Awaitless
PYPI · AWAITLESS-RUNNER
Durable execution and named concurrency queues for coding agents across local, SSH, and Slurm.
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 93% of PyPI servers
Category CI/CD and DevOps
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 29 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to xpluspro/Awaitless). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 57 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1434 tokens (~130/item across 11 items; 11 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 11 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 16 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 15 Oct 26 +1
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 14 Oct 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 −2
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 97 to 87.
- 8 Oct 26 +2
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Oct 26 −2
- Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
- 3 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 16 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/awaitless-runner@0.8.0
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | xpluspro/Awaitless |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/xpluspro/Awaitless/.github/workflows/publish-to-pypi.yml@refs/tags/v0.8.0 |
| Rekor log index | 2518974862 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:43444b7adfcb963dba5520512b878511fef08882d6f295ff5f79f74f691a2759 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 29 packages
| Packages resolved | 29 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
cancel_job ~37
Cancel a durable job without relying on a client-side process handle.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| grace_seconds | number | – | – |
| job_id | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
create_queue ~34
Create an immutable named FIFO queue with a fixed concurrency limit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| concurrency | integer | yes | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_job_logs ~99
Inspect bounded stdout and stderr tails for a known failed or stalled job. Use after a terminal wait reports failure, timeout, stall, or loss and its bounded result needs focused diagnostics. Do not use as a progress stream, do not repeatedly tail a running healthy Job, and do not use it instead of wait_for_job to learn that work completed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | – |
| max_bytes | – | – | – |
| tail | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_job_status ~83
Get one immediate, non-waiting state snapshot for a known job_id. Use only when the caller needs current status now. Do not use this to wait for completion or build a polling loop; use wait_for_job for one Job or wait_for_completions for several. This tool never starts or retries work.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_jobs ~42
List recent durable jobs, optionally filtered by state or host.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| host | – | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| queue | – | – | – |
| state | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_queues ~21
List named queues and their current queued/active job counts.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
run ~248
Default tool for starting one non-interactive command of uncertain duration. Every command is a durable Job from launch. Commands that finish within the inline timeout return their ordinary bounded result. Longer or queued work returns a detached Job handle without cancelling the workload. Omit queue to use an operator-configured default queue for the selected target. Do not use this tool for explicit fire-and-forget or batch fan-out; use submit_job. Do not use it when an MCP Tasks handle is explicitly required; use run_job. Do not use it to resume an existing job_id; wait for or inspect that job instead. If a detached handle is returned, keep its job_id and call wait_for_job once when the result is needed rather than polling status.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifacts | – | – | – |
| backend | – | – | – |
| capture_logs | – | – | – |
| client_request_id | – | – | – |
| command | array | yes | – |
| cwd | – | – | – |
| env | – | – | – |
| host | – | – | – |
| inline_timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
| name | – | – | – |
| queue | – | – | – |
| resources | – | – | – |
| slurm_options | – | – | – |
| stall_timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
| timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
run_job ~189
MCP Tasks compatibility entry point for explicitly creating a Task handle. A client declaring io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks receives a Task handle immediately. Older clients block and receive the ordinary final tool result. The stable client_request_id makes a lost creation response safe to retry. Do not choose this for ordinary command execution: use run. Do not choose it for generic asynchronous submission or fan-out: use submit_job. Only retry a lost Task creation with the same client_request_id and identical arguments.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifacts | – | – | – |
| backend | – | – | – |
| capture_logs | – | – | – |
| client_request_id | string | yes | – |
| command | array | yes | – |
| cwd | – | – | – |
| env | – | – | – |
| host | – | – | – |
| name | – | – | – |
| queue | – | – | – |
| resources | – | – | – |
| slurm_options | – | – | – |
| stall_timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
| timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
submit_job ~269
Explicitly submit one asynchronous or fan-out job without waiting. Omitted backend and host values use the Awaitless configuration defaults. Reuse client_request_id only when retrying the same logical submission; an identical retry returns the original job and a conflicting retry is rejected. A named queue provides FIFO, non-preemptive admission for local or SSH work. Slurm options may contain account, constraint, cpus_per_task, gres, mem, nodes, ntasks, partition, qos, or time. Cluster config supplies defaults. Do not use this as the default for a single command with uncertain duration; use run. Do not use it for MCP Tasks creation; use run_job. Do not resubmit merely because a client disconnected or a wait timed out: keep the original job_id, or retry the identical logical submission with the same client_request_id if the creation response was lost.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifacts | – | – | – |
| backend | – | – | – |
| capture_logs | – | – | – |
| client_request_id | – | – | – |
| command | array | yes | – |
| cwd | – | – | – |
| env | – | – | – |
| host | – | – | – |
| name | – | – | – |
| queue | – | – | – |
| resources | – | – | – |
| slurm_options | – | – | – |
| stall_timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
| timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
wait_for_completions ~168
Collect durable terminal results across multiple known jobs after a cursor. Existing completions return immediately. Otherwise the call waits until at least one selected job completes or the optional call-level timeout expires. Reusing the same cursor replays results; advancing to next_cursor consumes the returned batch. A timeout never cancels a managed job. Submit all independent jobs before calling this tool. Treat delivery as at-least-once: process and deduplicate by completion_id before advancing the cursor. Do not use this for one job, do not poll get_job_status between continuation calls, and never resubmit active jobs after a waiter disconnects.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| after_cursor | – | – | – |
| job_ids | array | yes | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
wait_for_job ~105
Wait once for a known job_id and consume its durable terminal result. Returns state, exit code, bounded logs, and declared Artifacts. A client-side timeout or disconnect does not cancel the Job; call this tool again later with the same job_id. Do not use it to start work, do not poll it repeatedly, and use wait_for_completions instead when collecting several independent Jobs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | – |
| timeout_seconds | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Awaitless MCP server?
Awaitless runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx awaitless-runner. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · awaitless-runner
claude mcp add xpluspro-awaitless -- uvx awaitless-runner
What is the Awaitless MCP server?
Awaitless is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.xpluspro/awaitless. Durable execution and named concurrency queues for coding agents across local, SSH, and Slurm. This page covers its PyPI package (awaitless-runner).
Is the Awaitless MCP server safe to use?
Awaitless scores 90 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 16 October 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Awaitless MCP server expose?
Awaitless exposes 11 tools: run, submit_job, run_job, wait_for_job, wait_for_completions, and 6 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,295 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Awaitless MCP server still maintained?
Awaitless is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 16 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Awaitless MCP server under?
Awaitless declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.