Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

designmark

NPM · DESIGNMARK

Search and fetch Japanese landing-page design systems (DESIGN.md) from designmark.jp.

Available components

0 this week 79 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 62% of npm servers

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 92 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to xecin-inc/designmark). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 11 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 825 tokens (~206/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 25 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 24 Oct 26 64

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/designmark@1.0.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo xecin-inc/designmark
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/xecin-inc/designmark/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v1.0.0
Rekor log index 3440759465
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:17a54f0dbd3810d1a5a79f08fde036c96392da3634ceabcfc21f471907aea68e3ab8adea4be7ccdef0224fa4f3082d0c8e05f84c441d24b836c45634a

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 92 packages
Packages resolved 92
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~682 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_design ~122

Fetch the full DESIGN.md of one Japanese landing-page design from designmark.jp by ID (xd-xxxxxxxx) or designmark.jp URL, to save as DESIGN.md in the project. Fetch at most 3 designs per user request; this server allows 30 fetches per 10 minutes, at least 1 second apart. The first line is a notice: these are unofficial analyses, so never reuse the original page's logos, photos, copy or product names.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesDesign ID (xd-xxxxxxxx) or a designmark.jp URL

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_pack ~111

Fetch the full DESIGN.md of a designmark pattern pack (pk-…) by ID or designmark.jp URL: a design system synthesised from many Japanese landing pages of one industry and mood. Pattern packs are CC BY 4.0 (attribution required); the first line shows the license and an attribution example. Counts toward the fetch limit (30 per 10 minutes, at least 1 second apart).

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesPattern pack ID (pk-…) or a designmark.jp URL

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_packs ~97

List designmark pattern packs (pk-…): CC BY 4.0 DESIGN.md files synthesised from many Japanese landing pages per industry and mood. One line per pack: ID | title | number of designs it was synthesised from. Does not count toward the fetch limit.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Industry name or slug, e.g. "cosmetics" or "化粧品・スキンケア"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_designs ~352

Search designmark.jp for DESIGN.md design systems of Japanese landing pages (LP): unofficial analyses of public Japanese LPs (colors, typography, spacing, components, section structure), plus CC BY 4.0 pattern packs synthesised per industry and mood. Filter by keywords (Japanese or English), industry, mood, main color and view. Returns one line per design: ID | title | industry | moods | main colors | page URL. Then fetch the chosen design with get_design (xd-…) or get_pack (pk-…). Searching reads a cached index and does not count toward the fetch limit (30 DESIGN.md fetches per 10 minutes).

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Industry name or slug, e.g. "cosmetics" or "化粧品・スキンケア"
colorstring–Main color family (LP designs only): red, orange, yellow, green, teal, blue, purple, pink, brown, black, gray, white, or a Japanese name such as 青
include_packsboolean–Include pattern packs (default true)
limitinteger–Maximum results (default 10)
moodsarray–Mood names or slugs, all of which must match: natural, soft, elegant, minimal, pop, retro, cute, sporty, cool, dark-luxury, trust, handmade, wafu, fresh, bold, dense
querystring–Keywords, all of which must match, e.g. "化粧品 上品" or "skincare"
viewstring–Analysed view (LP designs only): sp = smartphone, pc = desktop

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the designmark MCP server?

designmark runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y designmark. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · designmark

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add xecin-inc-designmark -- npx -y designmark
Common questions

What is the designmark MCP server?

designmark is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.xecin-inc/designmark. Search and fetch Japanese landing-page design systems (DESIGN.md) from designmark.jp. This page covers its npm package (designmark).

Is the designmark MCP server safe to use?

designmark scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the designmark MCP server expose?

designmark exposes 4 tools: search_designs, get_design, list_packs, get_pack. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 682 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the designmark MCP server still maintained?

designmark is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the designmark MCP server under?

designmark declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.