Datto SaaS Protection
OCI · GHCR.IO/WYRE-AI/DATTO-SAAS-PROTECTION-MCP:V2.1.5 · SCANNED SEP 20
MCP server for Datto SaaS Protection — M365/GWS backups, restores, seats.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 25 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability86
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 481 tokens (~48/item across 10 items; 9 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management83
- Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the Datto SaaS Protection MCP server?
Datto SaaS Protection runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5
claude mcp add wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5
{
"mcpServers": {
"wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"docker",
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} mcp_servers:
wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp:
command: "docker"
args: ["run", "--rm", "-i", "ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5"] {
"McpServers": {
"wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "docker",
"Arguments": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5"
]
}
}
} {
"mcpServers": {
"wyre-ai-datto-saas-protection-mcp": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 8 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
datto_saas_get_license_usage ~35
Get license usage / seat counts vs purchased for a client.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clientId | string | yes | Client identifier |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_get_restore_status ~34
Check the status / progress of a queued restore.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| restoreId | string | yes | Restore job identifier |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_get_seat ~32
Get details for a single seat by ID.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| seatId | string | yes | Seat identifier |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_list_activity ~72
List activity log entries for a client. If date range is omitted, the user will be prompted.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clientId | string | yes | Client identifier |
| since | string | – | ISO 8601 start datetime (optional) |
| until | string | – | ISO 8601 end datetime (optional) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_list_backups ~32
List backup runs / snapshots for a seat.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| seatId | string | yes | Seat identifier |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_list_clients ~38
List all customer organizations protected by Datto SaaS Protection.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | Max results (default: 100) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_list_domains ~52
List protected domains under a client. If clientId is omitted, the user will be prompted to pick one.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clientId | string | – | Client identifier (optional — will elicit if omitted) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_list_seats ~72
List seats (mailboxes/users) in a domain. Toggle includeArchived to see deactivated seats.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clientId | string | yes | Client identifier |
| domainId | string | yes | Domain identifier |
| includeArchived | boolean | – | Include archived seats (optional — will elicit if omitted) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
datto_saas_queue_restore ~92
Queue a restore for a seat. DESTRUCTIVE: writes data back into the target tenant. The destination user must have appropriate Microsoft Graph / Google API permissions for the restore to land. Requires explicit confirmation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| items | array | yes | Items (folder/message/file IDs) to restore. Pass an empty array to restore the entire seat. |
| seatId | string | yes | Seat identifier to restore from |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Datto SaaS Protection MCP server?
Datto SaaS Protection is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.WYRE-AI/datto-saas-protection-mcp. MCP server for Datto SaaS Protection, M365/GWS backups, restores, seats. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/wyre-ai/datto-saas-protection-mcp:v2.1.5).
Is the Datto SaaS Protection MCP server safe to use?
Datto SaaS Protection scores 54 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Datto SaaS Protection MCP server expose?
Datto SaaS Protection exposes 9 tools: datto_saas_list_clients, datto_saas_list_domains, datto_saas_list_seats, datto_saas_get_seat, datto_saas_list_backups, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 459 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Datto SaaS Protection MCP server still maintained?
Datto SaaS Protection is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Datto SaaS Protection MCP server under?
Datto SaaS Protection declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.