Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp

NPM · ABAP-ADT-MCP

ABAP development from Claude and other MCP hosts: source, transports, tests, ATC, debugger

Available components

+4 this week 91 Trust /100

Last scanned (18 hours ago)

Scores higher than 94% of npm servers

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security99
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 39 of 167 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to williansaez/abap-adt-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 578 tokens (~289/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
  • Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 2 Nov 26 −14
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Package version: 2.8.1 → 2.8.2 functional
  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +26
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Dependency health: unverified → 0.90 ▲ functional
  • 26 Oct 26 −25
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Dependency health: 0.90 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Security disclosure: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Package version: 2.8.0 → 2.8.1 functional
  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/abap-adt-mcp@2.8.2

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo williansaez/abap-adt-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/williansaez/abap-adt-mcp/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v2.8.2
Rekor log index 3643968418
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:7c07d7696e897d49e53b0f531be883ca1128f6752e2d8f8bc10aed256c5c0b09c86029fe882e11b37983c57acd90048ed0f2183e3f63309e8b52f8c36

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 167 packages
Packages resolved 167
Stale 39
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~53 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
healthcheck ~16

Check server health and list configured destinations.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

listSystems ~37

List the configured ABAP systems (destinations) this server can reach. Call this first to pick the destination to pass to all other tools.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp server?

io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y abap-adt-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · abap-adt-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add williansaez-abap-adt-mcp -- npx -y abap-adt-mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp server?

io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp. ABAP development from Claude and other MCP hosts: source, transports, tests, ATC, debugger. This page covers its npm package (abap-adt-mcp).

Is the io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp scores 91 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp server expose?

io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp exposes 2 tools: listSystems, healthcheck. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 53 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp server under?

io.github.williansaez/abap-adt-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.