WHP Standing
REMOTE · API.WHEELERHUBBELLPUBLISHING.COM
Paid, signed evaluations of structured claims and supporting sources. MCP; x402 on Base.
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 43% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category AI and Machine Learning
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability37
- 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 433 tokens (~61/item across 7 items; 4 tools + 3 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
- Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage85
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 55% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 31 Oct 26 56
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 16 Oct 2026 | 14 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5b61db55357884ebcc97635c91540d1c70e |
| SANs: api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| wheelerhubbellpublishing.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
whp_evaluate ~213
Evaluate a proposition under Decision Integrity Protocol and receive an Ed25519-signed Standing determination. Calling without payment returns the exact 1 USDC Base payment challenge. Pass payment_signature to settle and receive the signed determination.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | string | – | Optional WHP subscription API key (Developer, Team, or Institutional tier) bypassing x402 challenge. |
| claim | string | yes | The claim or proposition to evaluate (also accepts aliases: text, prompt, content). |
| idempotency_key | string | – | Optional idempotency key for safe execution recovery. |
| payment_signature | string | – | Base64 or JSON x402 v2 payment authorization for 1 USDC on Base (network eip155:8453 to 0x1050eddd8282623b0c263ed6bdbd42370bbc28d3). |
| provenance | object | – | Optional provenance graph or supporting evidence. |
| subject | string | – | Optional subject/context of the proposition (defaults to claim summary). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
whp_standing_contract ~41
Discover WHP Standing: Machine-verifiable standing under explicit authority and bounds. Includes exact profile, schema, authority prerequisites and owner-authorized payment contract.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
whp_standing_evaluation ~82
Request a WHP Standing Evaluation. First call returns the exact HTTP 402 payment terms. Supply only the buyer’s own pre-authorized payment signature on retry. Paying does not establish standing; a failed assessment has no Mark.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| client_proof | string | – | – |
| payment_signature | string | – | – |
| submission_raw | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
whp_standing_result ~48
Retrieve the exact original WHP Standing Mark or negative assessment bytes with buyer authentication, without another charge.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| client_proof | string | yes | – |
| purchase_id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the WHP Standing MCP server?
WHP Standing is a hosted endpoint at https://api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com
claude mcp add --transport http wheelerhubbell-whp-standing 'https://api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com/mcp'
What is the WHP Standing MCP server?
WHP Standing is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.wheelerhubbell/whp-standing. Paid, signed evaluations of structured claims and supporting sources. MCP; x402 on Base. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.wheelerhubbellpublishing.com/mcp).
Is the WHP Standing MCP server safe to use?
WHP Standing scores 58 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the WHP Standing MCP server expose?
WHP Standing exposes 4 tools: whp_evaluate, whp_standing_contract, whp_standing_evaluation, whp_standing_result. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 384 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the WHP Standing MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to WHP Standing without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the WHP Standing MCP server still maintained?
WHP Standing is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.