ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault
NPM · @CLAUDEINK/MCP-SERVER · SCANNED SEP 20
Save, search, and compile valuable knowledge from your Claude conversations.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security89
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects uuid 8.3.2, reached via node-cron > uuid. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 44 of 137 dependencies flagged as unhealthy (2 deprecated). View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL returned HTTP 404. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 171 days ago).Pass
- Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 944 tokens (~78/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
- Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage83
- 75% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Partial
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "ink.delete" implies "delete" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault MCP server?
ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @claudeink/mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @claudeink/mcp-server
claude mcp add weekdmond-claudeink -- npx -y @claudeink/mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"weekdmond-claudeink": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@claudeink/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"weekdmond-claudeink": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@claudeink/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add weekdmond-claudeink -- npx -y @claudeink/mcp-server
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"weekdmond-claudeink": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@claudeink/mcp-server"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add weekdmond-claudeink --command npx --arg -y --arg @claudeink/mcp-server
mcp_servers:
weekdmond-claudeink:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@claudeink/mcp-server"] {
"McpServers": {
"weekdmond-claudeink": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@claudeink/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add weekdmond-claudeink -t stdio -c npx -a -y @claudeink/mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"weekdmond-claudeink": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@claudeink/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
- 16 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 −4
- Stability: pass → 0.77 functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@claudeink/mcp-server@1.0.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 1 finding
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq | CVE-2026-41907 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 137 packages
| Packages resolved | 137 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 2 |
| Stale | 42 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ink.compile ~119
整合多条知识片段为结构化内容（按 ID 或搜索条件）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | string | – | 输出格式：outline（大纲）/ article（文章）/ summary（摘要） |
| ids | array | – | 指定要整合的知识片段 ID 列表 |
| instruction | string | – | 额外整合指令 |
| query | string | – | 搜索条件（与 ids 二选一） |
| tags | array | – | 按标签筛选（与 query 搭配） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ink.delete ~50
删除知识片段（需确认）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| confirm | boolean | – | 确认删除（必须为 true 才会执行删除） |
| id | string | yes | 知识片段 ID |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ink.get ~28
获取知识片段完整内容
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | 知识片段 ID |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ink.review ~98
按时间段回顾知识库（统计 + 列表）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | 按分类过滤 |
| date_from | string | – | 自定义起始日期（ISO 格式，period=custom 时使用） |
| date_to | string | – | 自定义截止日期（ISO 格式，period=custom 时使用） |
| period | string | – | 回顾时间段：today / week / month / custom |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ink.save ~124
保存知识片段到本地知识库（对话洞察、决策、分析等）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | 分类：insight / decision / analysis / idea / reference / action |
| content | string | yes | 要保存的内容（必填） |
| source_type | string | – | 来源类型：conversation / url / manual |
| tags | array | – | 标签（Claude 自动生成，用户可指定） |
| title | string | yes | 标题（Claude 自动生成） |
| url | string | – | 来源 URL（如果是外部素材） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ink.search ~100
搜索知识库（支持关键词、标签、分类、时间范围过滤）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | 按分类过滤 |
| date_from | string | – | 起始日期（ISO 格式） |
| date_to | string | – | 截止日期（ISO 格式） |
| limit | number | – | 返回数量，默认 10 |
| query | string | – | 搜索关键词 |
| tags | array | – | 按标签过滤 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ink.tags ~101
标签管理（列出 / 重命名 / 合并标签）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | 操作：list（列出所有标签）/ rename（重命名）/ merge（合并） |
| new_tag | string | – | 新标签名（rename 时使用） |
| source_tags | array | – | 要合并的源标签列表（merge 时使用） |
| tag | string | – | 目标标签（rename/merge 时使用） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ink.update ~77
更新已保存的知识片段（标题/内容/标签/分类）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | 新分类 |
| content | string | – | 新内容 |
| id | string | yes | 知识片段 ID |
| tags | array | – | 新标签（完整替换） |
| title | string | – | 新标题 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
source.crawl ~45
触发爬虫抓取（内容自动存入知识库）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| sourceId | string | – | 指定爬虫源名称，不传则全量 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
source.subscribe ~109
管理订阅源（添加/删除/列出爬虫源）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | 操作类型 |
| crawlConfig | object | – | 爬取适配规则（Claude 分析生成） |
| icon | string | – | 来源 icon URL |
| id | string | – | 订阅源 ID |
| name | string | – | 订阅源名称 |
| type | string | – | 源类型 |
| url | string | – | RSS/博客 URL |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
sync ~32
从云端同步知识元数据
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| workDir | string | – | 工作目录（默认使用配置中的 workflowDir） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
workflow.init ~61
初始化知识库（创建目录 + 激活 License + 同步云端）
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| licenseKey | string | – | License Key（可选，传入则自动激活） |
| workDir | string | yes | 工作流初始化目标目录（绝对路径） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault MCP server?
ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.weekdmond/claudeink. Save, search, and compile valuable knowledge from your Claude conversations. This page covers its npm package (@claudeink/mcp-server).
Is the ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault MCP server safe to use?
ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault MCP server expose?
ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault exposes 12 tools: workflow.init, sync, ink.save, ink.search, ink.get, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 944 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault MCP server still maintained?
ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault MCP server under?
ClaudeInk — Knowledge Vault declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.