Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

AIWiseRank

REMOTE · AIWISERANK.COM

AI tools ranked by real web traffic, with pricing, free plans, alternatives and LLM API benchmarks.

Available components

+3 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 64% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 785 tokens (~112/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management40
  • Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage90
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 69% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “best_ai_tools” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “best_ai_tools” reworded the description of “category” cosmetic
    • “search_ai_tools” reworded the description of “category” cosmetic
  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.0.1 functional
  • 24 Oct 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://aiwiserank.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=aiwiserank.com CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 16 Sept 2026 15 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 590b9fe90a3ac9fd16f052b62f2260e665a
SANs: aiwiserank.com, www.aiwiserank.com
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of aiwiserank.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
aiwiserank.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
content-security-policy upgrade-insecure-requests

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://aiwiserank.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://aiwiserank.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://aiwiserank.com/mcp
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~664 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
ai_traffic_report ~64

Which AI tools gained and lost real-world usage in a month: key takeaways, biggest risers and fallers, category momentum. Defaults to the latest month.

NameTypeReqDescription
monthstring–Optional month as YYYY-MM, e.g. "2026-09".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

best_ai_tools ~111

The most-used AI tools in a category, ranked by real web traffic, with pricing and links. Categories: Software Engineering, Design & Creative, AI Models, Writing & Content, Customer Support, Productivity, Marketing & SEO, Data Analytics, Video Production, Sales Intelligence.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyesOne of: Software Engineering, Design & Creative, AI Models, Writing & Content, Customer Support, Productivity, Marketing & SEO, Data Analytics, Video Production, Sales Intelligence
limitinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

compare_ai_tools ~58

Side-by-side comparison of 2 to 4 AI tools: traffic rank, trend, pricing, free plan, score and alternatives.

NameTypeReqDescription
toolsarrayyesTool names, e.g. ["Cursor", "GitHub Copilot"].

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_ai_tool ~72

Everything AIWiseRank knows about one AI tool: summary, category rank, global traffic rank and 7/30-day trend, pricing and free plan, score, top alternatives and links.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesTool name, e.g. "Cursor", "Midjourney", "ElevenLabs".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_ai_tool_categories ~32

The AI tool categories AIWiseRank ranks, with how many tools each has and its most-visited tool.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

llm_api_pricing ~122

API token prices (USD per 1M input/output tokens) for current AI models across providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, Mistral, xAI and more), with ARC-AGI-2 and SWE-bench Verified scores where published. Sort by cheapest, best ARC-AGI-2 or best SWE-bench.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
providerstring–Optional provider name, e.g. "Anthropic", "OpenAI", "Google".
sortstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_ai_tools ~205

Find AI tools for a task or need (e.g. "edit podcast audio", "AI video avatars", "SEO keyword research"), ranked by real web traffic. Optional filters: category, free plan only, max monthly price in USD. Returns tools with pricing, rank and a link to each tool's AIWiseRank page.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional category: Software Engineering, Design & Creative, AI Models, Writing & Content, Customer Support, Productivity, Marketing & SEO, Data Analytics, Video Production, Sales Intelligence
free_plan_onlyboolean–Only tools with a confirmed free plan or free tier.
limitinteger––
max_monthly_usdnumber–Budget: only tools whose entry paid plan costs at most this much per month (USD list prices). Tools with a free plan always count as within budget.
querystringyesWhat the user wants to do or the kind of tool, in plain words.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the AIWiseRank MCP server?

AIWiseRank is a hosted endpoint at https://aiwiserank.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · aiwiserank.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http vlcode87-aiwiserank 'https://aiwiserank.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the AIWiseRank MCP server?

AIWiseRank is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.VLCODE87/aiwiserank. AI tools ranked by real web traffic, with pricing, free plans, alternatives and LLM API benchmarks. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aiwiserank.com/mcp).

Is the AIWiseRank MCP server safe to use?

AIWiseRank scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the AIWiseRank MCP server expose?

AIWiseRank exposes 7 tools: search_ai_tools, get_ai_tool, best_ai_tools, compare_ai_tools, list_ai_tool_categories, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 664 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the AIWiseRank MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to AIWiseRank without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the AIWiseRank MCP server still maintained?

AIWiseRank is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.