x402 Compatibility Intelligence
REMOTE · INTELLIGENCE.INVERSOLABS.US
Preflight x402 payment compatibility with structured risk evidence and remediation guidance.
Available components
Last scanned (1 day ago)
Scores higher than 4% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security46
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 502, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability0
- Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but the endpoint returned HTTP 502. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 28 Oct 26 −46
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Stability: 0.80 → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +45
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.67 ▲ functional
- 22 Oct 26 −44
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Stability: 0.60 → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Oct 26 +42
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.50 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 7 Oct 26 −47
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: 0.87 → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://intelligence.inversolabs.us/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=inversolabs.us | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 29 Oct 2026 | 27 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 93e7f2b01a3f28230e6d521789d13212 |
| SANs: inversolabs.us, *.inversolabs.us | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of intelligence.inversolabs.us. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| us. | present | 59017 | 8 | Verified |
| inversolabs.us. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Inconclusive
We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.
| Result | Inconclusive |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 502 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | same-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://intelligence.inversolabs.us/mcp | HTTP error | 502 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://intelligence.inversolabs.us/mcp | Inconclusive | 502 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
x402_compatibility_intelligence x402 Payment Pre-Sign Validation, Facilitator Compatibility, Protocol Diagnostics & Settlement Risk ~76
Validate an x402 payment before signing: check facilitator compatibility, payment-protocol diagnostics, network and asset support, replay risk, and settlement risk from maintained compatibility evidence.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| discovery_mode | string | – | – |
| facilitator_url | string | yes | – |
| offer | object | yes | – |
| policy | object | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| assessed_at | string | yes | – |
| evidence | array | yes | – |
| limitations | array | yes | – |
| reasons | array | yes | – |
| recovery | object|null | – | – |
| safe_to_sign | boolean | yes | – |
| selected | object|null | yes | – |
| verdict | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the x402 Compatibility Intelligence MCP server?
x402 Compatibility Intelligence is a hosted endpoint at https://intelligence.inversolabs.us/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · intelligence.inversolabs.us
claude mcp add --transport http us-inversolabs-x402-compatibility-intelligence 'https://intelligence.inversolabs.us/mcp'
What is the x402 Compatibility Intelligence MCP server?
x402 Compatibility Intelligence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as us.inversolabs/x402-compatibility-intelligence. Preflight x402 payment compatibility with structured risk evidence and remediation guidance. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://intelligence.inversolabs.us/mcp).
Is the x402 Compatibility Intelligence MCP server safe to use?
x402 Compatibility Intelligence scores 18 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the x402 Compatibility Intelligence MCP server expose?
x402 Compatibility Intelligence exposes 1 tool: x402_compatibility_intelligence. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 76 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the x402 Compatibility Intelligence MCP server require authentication?
Its publisher declares no required credentials for x402 Compatibility Intelligence. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.
Is the x402 Compatibility Intelligence MCP server still maintained?
x402 Compatibility Intelligence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.