Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site

REMOTE · ASBESTOSSURVEYCOST.CO.UK

Asbestos Survey Cost: the site's own MCP server — dataset, enquiry, entities (enquiry = a human...

0 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 76% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability87
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1675 tokens (~98/item across 17 items; 15 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage74
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 23% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 15 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 17 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 13 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 7 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 5 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 4 Oct 26 74
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 15 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.70 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 3 Oct 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.63 → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. security
    • Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://asbestossurveycost.co.uk/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=asbestossurveycost.co.uk CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 10 Sept 2026 9 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 d0b61734254717761372c2e506a75b09
SANs: asbestossurveycost.co.uk, *.asbestossurveycost.co.uk
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of asbestossurveycost.co.uk. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
uk. present 43876 8 Verified
co.uk. present 11810 8 Verified
asbestossurveycost.co.uk. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://asbestossurveycost.co.uk/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://asbestossurveycost.co.uk/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://asbestossurveycost.co.uk/mcp
MCP tools · 15 exposed · ~1,118 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
dataset_columns ~40

The columns, which of them are numeric, the row count and the provenance banner of the Asbestos Survey Cost dataset. Call this first to learn the schema.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dataset_compare ~53

The rows of the Asbestos Survey Cost dataset whose column is any of the given values, in the order given — for "X vs Y" questions.

NameTypeReqDescription
columnstringyes–
valuesarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dataset_provenance ~40

The source, the date it was computed, the licence and the citation for the Asbestos Survey Cost dataset. Read this to attribute a figure correctly.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dataset_row ~43

The rows of the Asbestos Survey Cost dataset where a column equals a value exactly (case-insensitive).

NameTypeReqDescription
columnstringyes–
valuestringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dataset_search ~52

Rows of the Asbestos Survey Cost dataset whose cells contain the query (case-insensitive), up to 50.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
querystringyestext to look for in any cell

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dataset_stats ~55

count, min, max, mean, median and sum of a numeric column of the Asbestos Survey Cost dataset (grouping commas and currency are handled; non-numeric rows are excluded and counted).

NameTypeReqDescription
columnstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dataset_top ~66

The highest (or lowest) rows of the Asbestos Survey Cost dataset by a numeric column — "which is the most/least X".

NameTypeReqDescription
ascendingboolean–true for the lowest first; default highest first
columnstringyes–
limitinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

enquiry_describe ~70

Read first. States plainly what submit_enquiry does on Asbestos Survey Cost: it starts an enquiry with human providers who quote directly. Nothing is bought, ordered or paid; no quote is guaranteed; it is free. Also returns who receives the details, the consent wording, and how the person confirms.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

enquiry_fields ~49

Every field of the Asbestos Survey Cost enquiry: key, label, type, whether required, help text and the allowed options where there are any. Pass answers to submit_enquiry keyed by field key.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

entities_export ~71

Every entity of Asbestos Survey Cost register, 200 a page, with provenance. Needs an access key (Authorization: Bearer); export pages are metered per key per day. Without a key the answer says how to get one.

NameTypeReqDescription
pageinteger––
pageSizeinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

entities_in ~69

The Asbestos Survey Cost register entities in one region (a state or a jurisdiction, by id or name), optionally for one service, 50 a page.

NameTypeReqDescription
pageinteger––
pageSizeinteger––
regionstringyes–
servicestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

entities_schema ~43

Which fields the Asbestos Survey Cost register register carries and on how many entities, the regions and services, the identifier schemes, and how to cite it. Call this first.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

entities_search ~81

Entities of Asbestos Survey Cost register whose name, commercial name, website, address or authority contains the query, optionally within a region (id or name) and a service (slug or name). Up to 50 rows.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
qstring––
regionstring––
servicestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

entity_lookup ~90

The Asbestos Survey Cost register entry for a firm, by its register identifier (scheme + value, e.g. lei) or by the slug of its page. Exact match; returns the whole record with its page.

NameTypeReqDescription
schemestring–identifier scheme, e.g. lei, fca_frn, tdlr_license
slugstring––
valuestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

submit_enquiry ~296

Submits an enquiry to Asbestos Survey Cost — NOT a purchase, NOT a guaranteed quote. Step 1: call with the answers (keyed by field key from enquiry_fields) and consent=true; it validates and returns a summary, the consent line and a confirmation token — show the person the summary and the consent line. Step 2: only if the person agrees, call again with the same answers, consent=true and the confirmation token; the enquiry is then submitted, and the person receives an email with a link they must click before any provider sees it. Consent means the person has read and agreed to: "Send my contact details to up to three surveyors and contractors who do the work I asked about, chosen by Asbestos Survey Cost, who'll contact me directly. I'll be emailed each firm's name as my details go to it, and can stop any more firms getting them."

NameTypeReqDescription
answersobjectyesthe person's answers, keyed by field key
confirmationstring–the confirmation token from step 1, after the person has approved the summary
consentbooleanyestrue only when the person has agreed to: Send my contact details to up to three surveyors and contractors who do the work I asked about, chosen by Asbestos Survey Cost, who'll contact me directly. I'…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site MCP server?

uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site is a hosted endpoint at https://asbestossurveycost.co.uk/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · asbestossurveycost.co.uk

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http uk-co-asbestossurveycost-site 'https://asbestossurveycost.co.uk/mcp'
Common questions

What is the uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site MCP server?

uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site. Asbestos Survey Cost: the site's own MCP server, dataset, enquiry, entities (enquiry = a human... This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://asbestossurveycost.co.uk/mcp).

Is the uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site MCP server safe to use?

uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site MCP server expose?

uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site exposes 15 tools: dataset_columns, dataset_search, dataset_row, dataset_compare, dataset_stats, and 10 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,118 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site MCP server still maintained?

uk.co.asbestossurveycost/site is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.