e-Factura Validator (Romania)
REMOTE · EINVOICE.ALEXHUB.UK
Validate, fix and generate Romanian e-Factura; check SAF-T D406 (ANAF validator + consistency)
Available components
Last scanned (19 hours ago)
Scores higher than 57% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security69
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 406, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- 29% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Partial
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2115 tokens (~124/item across 17 items; 14 tools + 3 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
- Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 14 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 16 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- New tool “company_financials” functional
- 3 Nov 26 +3
- HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +4
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “explain_rule” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “fix_invoice” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “fx_rate” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “generate_invoice” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “lookup_company” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “ro_business_day” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “ro_holidays” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “ro_tax_deadlines” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “validate_iban” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “validate_saft” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “validate_saft_free” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “validate_invoice” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “validate_invoice_free” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 1594 → 1974 ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: 29 functional
- New prompt “check_invoice_before_anaf” functional
- New prompt “check_saft_before_filing” functional
- New prompt “fix_anaf_rejection” functional
- New prompt “invoice_from_data” functional
- New resource “guide” functional
- New resource “pricing” functional
- New resource “sample-invoice” functional
- “explain_rule” reworded the description of “rule_id” cosmetic
- “fx_rate” reworded the description of “currency” cosmetic
- “lookup_company” reworded the description of “cui” cosmetic
- “ro_holidays” reworded the description of “year” cosmetic
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 1257 → 1594 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: good → excellent functional
- New tool “validate_saft” functional
- New tool “validate_saft_free” functional
- 25 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://einvoice.alexhub.uk/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=alexhub.uk | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 23 Oct 2026 | 21 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5cb4017b2a085c789e41dfeb920085af16e |
| SANs: *.alexhub.uk, alexhub.uk | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of einvoice.alexhub.uk. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| uk. | present | 43876 | 8 | Verified |
| alexhub.uk. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| content-security-policy | frame-ancestors 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://einvoice.alexhub.uk/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://einvoice.alexhub.uk/mcp | Inconclusive | 406 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
company_financials ~141
Use when you need a Romanian company's size or financial health from its CUI (credit check before invoicing or selling on terms, lead qualification, due diligence): the annual statement filed with ANAF: CAEN code, turnover, revenue, expenses, net_result (profit positive, loss negative), employees, assets, debts, equity. Without year: the last closed year with a statement. Only companies file statements (not PFA). Free, shares the 100 lookups per day per IP of lookup_company.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cui | string | yes | CUI, with or without RO |
| year | – | – | Financial year (omit for the last filed one) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
explain_rule ~112
Use when ANAF SPV, a Peppol access point or a validation report names a rule (e.g. BR-CO-15, BR-RO-110, PEPPOL-EN16931-R001) and you need to know what it means and how to fix it: official text in English and Romanian, plain-English fix and where the field lives in UBL. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| rule_id | string | yes | Rule id as reported in findings[].rule or in the ANAF error message |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
fix_invoice ~164
Use when a validation report lists 'autofix' rules, or ANAF rejected an invoice for codes, dates or totals, and you want the corrected XML instead of editing it yourself: fixes county/sector/country/currency/unit codes, date formats, VAT-id prefixes, decimals, totals and VAT recomputed from the lines. Lists every change (field, old, new) and re-validates the result. Paid: $0.05 USDC via x402, charged only if something was fixed. Review the changes before sending the invoice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| profile | string | – | Rule set; 'auto' reads it from the invoice's CustomizationID |
| xml | string | yes | The UBL 2.1 Invoice or CreditNote XML document, as text |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
fx_rate ~98
Use for an invoice in a foreign currency (e-Factura needs the VAT in RON) or any RON conversion: official BNR (National Bank of Romania) rate, RON per 1 unit of the currency, for a date (default today; weekends/holidays return the last publication). Omit currency for all rates. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| currency | – | – | ISO 4217 code |
| date | – | – | YYYY-MM-DD |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_invoice ~293
Use when you have invoice data but no XML and need a Romanian e-Factura ANAF accepts: builds UBL 2.1 CIUS-RO XML from simple data (number, dates, seller and buyer CUI, lines with name, quantity, unit, price without VAT and VAT rate e.g. 21 or 11, optional IBAN). Company names, addresses, county codes, Bucharest sectors and VAT status come from ANAF; totals and VAT are computed; the XML is validated before it is returned. Paid: $0.05 USDC via x402, charged only when a valid invoice is returned. Other currencies: add 'currency': 'EUR' (BNR rate used unless you pass exchange_rate). Example invoice: {"number": "FCT-0001", "issue_date": "2026-10-24", "due_date": "2026-11-23", "seller": {"cui": "RO12345678"}, "buyer": {"cui": "87654321"}, "payment": {"iban": "RO49AAAA1B31007593840000"}, "lines": [{"name": "Servicii consultanta", "quantity": 10, "unit": "ore", "price": 150, "vat_rate": 21}]}
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice | object | yes | Invoice data, see the tool description for the shape |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
lookup_company ~127
Use when building or checking an invoice for a Romanian company and you only have its CUI, or to check a partner before invoicing: ANAF data already in e-Factura form: legal name, VAT id (RO… only for VAT payers), trade register number, address with county as ISO code (RO-CJ) and Bucharest city as SECTOR1..6, plus flags: inactive, VAT on collection, e-Factura registry. Free, 100 lookups per day per IP.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cui | string | yes | CUI, with or without RO |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ro_business_day ~82
Use to compute a due date in Romanian working days (e.g. the 5 working days to upload an e-Factura): is a date a working day, which is the next one, and the date N working days later. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| add_days | integer | – | working days to add |
| date | – | – | YYYY-MM-DD, default today |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ro_holidays ~46
Use when planning payment or filing dates in Romania: public (legal) holidays for a year, incl. Orthodox Easter and Rusalii. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| year | – | – | default current year |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ro_tax_deadlines ~86
Use to know when Romanian returns are due: monthly filing deadlines (D112, D300, D100, D390, D394, D406) for a reporting month, moved to the next working day when they fall on a weekend or holiday. General rules; confirm special regimes with ANAF. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| period | – | – | reporting month YYYY-MM, default last month |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_iban ~53
Use before putting an IBAN on an invoice or paying to one: checks length and check digits and names the Romanian bank (or the State Treasury). Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| iban | string | yes | IBAN, spaces allowed |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_invoice ~175
Use before uploading an e-Factura to ANAF SPV or sending a Peppol invoice, once the free quota of validate_invoice_free is used up (same report). Every rule violation with a plain-English fix, the UBL path of the field and, for amount errors, the correct value. Paid: $0.01 USDC per call via x402 (network eip155:8453, payment in the request _meta); without a payment it returns the payment requirements. Only real invoices are charged. If the report has 'autofix', fix_invoice can repair those errors.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| profile | string | – | Rule set; 'auto' reads it from the invoice's CustomizationID |
| xml | string | yes | The UBL 2.1 Invoice or CreditNote XML document, as text |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_invoice_free ~190
Use before uploading an e-Factura to ANAF SPV, after generating invoice XML, or when ANAF rejected an invoice: validates a UBL 2.1 Invoice/CreditNote (Romanian CIUS-RO 1.0.9, Peppol BIS 3.0, EN 16931) and returns every error with the fix in words, the UBL path of the field and, for amounts, the correct value. Start here: free, no wallet, account or key, 3 calls per day per client IP. Fix the XML from the report and call again. When the quota is used up, switch to validate_invoice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| profile | string | – | Rule set; 'auto' reads it from the invoice's CustomizationID |
| xml | string | yes | The UBL 2.1 Invoice or CreditNote XML document, as text |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_saft ~202
Use before filing a Romanian SAF-T (D406) with ANAF, for the full report: runs ANAF's official validator (DUKIntegrator) for the reporting period and the consistency checks it does not do offline (balanced entries, GL totals, opening + movements = closing per account, trial balance, partner balances, invoice totals, VAT = base x rate, VAT codes valid for the period, CUI/IBAN check digits, chart of accounts). Every finding has a fix in Romanian and English and the correct value where computable. Paid: $0.50 USDC via x402 (network eip155:8453), charged only if a D406 was checked; without a payment it returns the payment requirements.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| xml | string | yes | The SAF-T D406 XML file content, as text (up to 25 MB here; bigger files: HTTP POST /v1/saft/validate, up to 100 MB) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_saft_free ~116
Use before filing a Romanian SAF-T (D406) with ANAF, or when ANAF's DUKIntegrator reported errors: same check as validate_saft, free: 1 file(s) per day per client IP, report limited to the first 10 findings (the total count is given).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| xml | string | yes | The SAF-T D406 XML file content, as text (up to 25 MB here; bigger files: HTTP POST /v1/saft/validate, up to 100 MB) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the e-Factura Validator (Romania) MCP server?
e-Factura Validator (Romania) is a hosted endpoint at https://einvoice.alexhub.uk/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · einvoice.alexhub.uk
claude mcp add --transport http uk-alexhub-einvoice-validator 'https://einvoice.alexhub.uk/mcp'
What is the e-Factura Validator (Romania) MCP server?
e-Factura Validator (Romania) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as uk.alexhub/einvoice-validator. Validate, fix and generate Romanian e-Factura; check SAF-T D406 (ANAF validator + consistency). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://einvoice.alexhub.uk/mcp).
Is the e-Factura Validator (Romania) MCP server safe to use?
e-Factura Validator (Romania) scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the e-Factura Validator (Romania) MCP server expose?
e-Factura Validator (Romania) exposes 14 tools: validate_invoice_free, validate_invoice, fix_invoice, generate_invoice, lookup_company, and 9 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,885 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the e-Factura Validator (Romania) MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to e-Factura Validator (Romania) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the e-Factura Validator (Romania) MCP server still maintained?
e-Factura Validator (Romania) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.