AlphaDesk
MCPB · ALPHADESK.MCPB
US equity research tools: SEC 10-K/10-Q search with citations, prices, risk, simulated orders.
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 72% of MCPB servers
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security12
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs were checked across the 40 of 40 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- 3 of 40 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 504 tokens (~72/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (13)
- Known CVEs
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (3)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Malware scan in Supply Chain SecurityNo malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
- Install scripts in Supply Chain SecurityInstall-script risk not yet assessed.
- Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 39
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/TTNAN/AlphaDesk/releases/download/v0.1.1/alphadesk.mcpb
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 40 packages
| Packages resolved | 40 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 2 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
draft_order ~68
生成模拟订单（PENDING_CONFIRMATION）。不执行真实交易。需用户在本地 CLI 人工确认。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit_price | – | – | – |
| order_type | string | – | – |
| quantity | integer | yes | – |
| side | string | yes | – |
| ticker | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_company_news ~36
查询公司近期新闻标题（Yahoo Finance RSS 缓存）。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| ticker | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_key_financials ~68
查询 SEC XBRL 结构化财务数据（revenue, net_income, eps_diluted, operating_cash_flow, capex 等）。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| metrics | – | – | – |
| period | string | – | – |
| ticker | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_price_history ~39
查询最近 N 个交易日收盘价和区间涨跌幅。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | integer | – | – |
| ticker | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_quote ~54
查询最新日线收盘价、涨跌幅、52 周高低点（非实时）。ticker: NVDA/MSFT/AAPL/TSLA/AMZN/QQQ
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
portfolio_risk ~68
计算组合年化波动率、最大回撤、HHI 集中度、相对 QQQ 的 beta。holdings 例: [{"ticker":"NVDA","weight":0.6}]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| holdings | array | yes | – |
| lookback_days | integer | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_filings ~75
在最新 10-K/10-Q 原文中做 BM25 检索，返回带 chunk_id 的段落。回答时用 [chunk_id] 引用。query 建议用英文。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| form | – | – | – |
| k | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| ticker | – | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the AlphaDesk MCP server?
AlphaDesk ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, b6782095f1d523525c093394c574275701d2f32ec090da6cac29805395d288fd; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.
mcpb · alphadesk.mcpb
Download bundleCheck the download matches the SHA-256 the MCP registry declares before you open it. If it does not match, do not open the file.
SHA-256
b6782095f1d523525c093394c574275701d2f32ec090da6cac29805395d288fd
macOS / Linux
echo "b6782095f1d523525c093394c574275701d2f32ec090da6cac29805395d288fd alphadesk.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
Windows (PowerShell)
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\alphadesk.mcpb).Hash -eq "b6782095f1d523525c093394c574275701d2f32ec090da6cac29805395d288fd"
Run it in the folder you saved the bundle to, then open the file with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the AlphaDesk MCP server?
AlphaDesk is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.TTNAN/alphadesk. US equity research tools: SEC 10-K/10-Q search with citations, prices, risk, simulated orders. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/TTNAN/AlphaDesk/releases/download/v0.1.1/alphadesk.mcpb).
Is the AlphaDesk MCP server safe to use?
AlphaDesk scores 39 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the AlphaDesk MCP server expose?
AlphaDesk exposes 7 tools: get_quote, get_price_history, get_company_news, search_filings, get_key_financials, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 408 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the AlphaDesk MCP server under?
AlphaDesk declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the AlphaDesk MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on AlphaDesk, covering Known CVEs, Dependency health, Source repository, Provenance and 9 more. 3 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about AlphaDesk: Malware scan, Install scripts and Stability. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an MCPB bundle, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.