Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Prospect Intelligence

REMOTE · PROSPECT-INTELLIGENCE.PROSPECTINTEL.WORKERS.DEV

B2B company research and work-email lookup for AI agents. Pay per call in USDC on Base via x402.

+3 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 76% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1267 tokens (~181/item across 7 items; 6 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
  • Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=prospectintel.workers.dev CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 7 Sept 2026 6 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 5608fbca9661874e0e6c6cda66de40d5
SANs: prospectintel.workers.dev, *.prospectintel.workers.dev
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/mcp Served over HTTP 200
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,050 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
basic_lookup ~162

Public company profile: summary plus firmographics (industry, HQ city/country, founded year, employee count and size range, ticker, LinkedIn/X), each field with source, source_url, checked_at and confidence, from Wikidata, Wikipedia, the company homepage and SEC EDGAR. Unknown fields are null, never guessed. Not a contact or CRM record. Price: $0.10 USDC on Base per call via x402; this MCP call returns payment instructions and the paid HTTP route POST /v1/basic returns the brief. Read-only.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystringyesCompany name, for example "Stripe".
domainstring–Optional company website domain without https, for example stripe.com. Improves accuracy and enables the public website crawl.
NameTypeReqDescription
messagestringyesHuman-readable summary.
paymentobject–Payment instructions. MCP tools/call does not charge or run the paid work; call the HTTP route with x402.
resultobject–Paid result: { tool, version, company: { name, domain, summary, summary_source_url, public_page, firmographics: { official_name, industry, hq_city, hq_country, founded_year, employee_count, size_rang…
statusstringyespayment_required: pay the HTTP route with x402 to get the result. ok: result is included.
toolstringyesTool name.

No examples provided.

email_lookup ~207

Find one person's work email at a company domain. Returns the address, whether it was found publicly or inferred from the company's pattern, Hunter's real verification status (valid, accept_all, unknown, invalid), a confidence score, the pages it was seen on and a recommendation. Price: $0.08 USDC on Base via x402, charged only when an address is returned (no result = not charged); this MCP call returns payment instructions for POST /v1/email. Read-only; never sends email. 'valid' means the mail server accepted the address, not that a person reads it.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyesCompany email domain, for example stripe.com.
first_namestring–Person's first name.
found_onlyboolean–If true, return only addresses found publicly (no pattern inference).
full_namestring–Alternative to first_name + last_name: the full name.
last_namestring–Person's last name.
NameTypeReqDescription
messagestringyesHuman-readable summary.
paymentobject–Payment instructions. MCP tools/call does not charge or run the paid work; call the HTTP route with x402.
resultobject–Paid result: { outcome, email, address_origin, verification: { status, provider }, confidence: { score }, evidence: { sources }, recommendation, billing }.
statusstringyespayment_required: pay the HTTP route with x402 to get the result. ok: result is included.
toolstringyesTool name.

No examples provided.

enriched_lookup ~199

Prospecting record: everything in basic_lookup plus buying signals (90 days of news, SEC filings), open roles from public job boards, a 0-100 ICP fit score with stated reasons (optional icp input), a sales brief built only from cited facts, recommended next actions and roles to target (no invented names). Every item cites its source. Price: $0.75 USDC on Base per call via x402; this MCP call returns payment instructions and the paid HTTP route POST /v1/enriched returns the record. Read-only.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystringyesCompany name, for example "Stripe".
domainstring–Optional company website domain without https, for example stripe.com. Improves accuracy and enables the public website crawl.
icpobject–Optional ideal-customer profile for icp_fit: size_ranges (e.g. ["51-200"]), industries (keywords), countries (ISO-2).
NameTypeReqDescription
messagestringyesHuman-readable summary.
paymentobject–Payment instructions. MCP tools/call does not charge or run the paid work; call the HTTP route with x402.
resultobject–Paid result: basic_lookup fields plus buying_signals { status, value[] }, hiring { open_roles, top_departments, source_url }, icp_fit { score, verdict, reasons[] }, sales_brief { points[] }, recommen…
statusstringyespayment_required: pay the HTTP route with x402 to get the result. ok: result is included.
toolstringyesTool name.

No examples provided.

find_emails_batch ~205

Find work emails for 1-25 people in one call, for cleaning a whole prospect list. Each result has exactly the same fields and recommendation labels as email_lookup (found vs inferred, Hunter's real status, score, sources, send / send_with_caution / verify_first / do_not_send), returned in input order with summary counts. Duplicates are looked up once; one contact failing never fails the batch. Price: x402 upto on Base: you authorize up to $0.08 x unique contacts and are charged $0.08 only per address returned. This MCP call returns payment instructions for POST /v1/email/batch. Read-only; never sends email.

NameTypeReqDescription
contactsarrayyes1 to 25 people to look up. Each needs domain plus first_name and last_name, or domain plus full_name.
found_onlyboolean–Default for every contact: if true, return only publicly found addresses (no pattern inference).
NameTypeReqDescription
messagestringyesHuman-readable summary.
paymentobject–Payment instructions. MCP tools/call does not charge or run the paid work; call the HTTP route with x402.
resultobject–Paid result: { summary: { requested, unique, duplicates, found, send, send_with_caution, verify_first, do_not_send, no_result, opted_out, errors }, billing, results: [ same shape as email_lookup plus…
statusstringyespayment_required: pay the HTTP route with x402 to get the result. ok: result is included.
toolstringyesTool name.

No examples provided.

prospect_brief ~116

Full sales prospect brief for one company: overview, positioning, likely needs and talking points, built from public sources with URLs. Price: $3.00 USDC on Base per call via x402; this MCP call returns payment instructions and the paid HTTP route POST /v1/deep returns the brief. Read-only.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystringyesCompany name, for example "Stripe".
domainstring–Optional company website domain without https, for example stripe.com. Improves accuracy and enables the public website crawl.
NameTypeReqDescription
messagestringyesHuman-readable summary.
paymentobject–Payment instructions. MCP tools/call does not charge or run the paid work; call the HTTP route with x402.
resultobject–Paid result: prospect brief with source URLs.
statusstringyespayment_required: pay the HTTP route with x402 to get the result. ok: result is included.
toolstringyesTool name.

No examples provided.

run_named_tool ~161

Run one named public-source analysis: research_company, research_person, find_decision_makers, analyze_marketing_opportunity, identify_buying_signals, enrich_prospect, score_prospect or generate_prospect_brief. Fields with no verified public source come back as unknown rather than guessed. Price: $0.75 USDC on Base per call via x402; this MCP call returns payment instructions and the paid HTTP route POST /v1/tools returns the result. Read-only.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystring–Company name (for company tools).
domainstring–Optional company domain, for example stripe.com.
personstring–Person's full name (for research_person).
toolstringyesWhich analysis to run.
NameTypeReqDescription
messagestringyesHuman-readable summary.
paymentobject–Payment instructions. MCP tools/call does not charge or run the paid work; call the HTTP route with x402.
resultobject–Paid result: the named analysis with source URLs.
statusstringyespayment_required: pay the HTTP route with x402 to get the result. ok: result is included.
toolstringyesTool name.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Prospect Intelligence MCP server?

Prospect Intelligence is a hosted endpoint at https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http truepointmarketingpartners-dotcom-prospect-intel 'https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Prospect Intelligence MCP server?

Prospect Intelligence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.truepointmarketingpartners-dotcom/prospect-intell…. B2B company research and work-email lookup for AI agents. Pay per call in USDC on Base via x402. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the Prospect Intelligence MCP server safe to use?

Prospect Intelligence scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Prospect Intelligence MCP server expose?

Prospect Intelligence exposes 6 tools: basic_lookup, enriched_lookup, prospect_brief, run_named_tool, email_lookup, find_emails_batch. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,050 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Prospect Intelligence MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Prospect Intelligence without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Prospect Intelligence MCP server still maintained?

Prospect Intelligence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.