Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate

REMOTE · VALIDATE.GMCA.BE

GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate: 11 vragen om een project te screenen vóór investering.

Available components

+3 this week 79 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 79% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security66
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 3 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability78
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 509 tokens (~169/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
  • Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://validate.gmca.be/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=validate.gmca.be CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 18 Oct 2026 16 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 6b17dc25b0a1f97c0a0bb7d446a5cbf9
SANs: validate.gmca.be
CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d
CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 1 Sept 1998 28 Jan 2028 RSA 2048 SHA1-RSA 40000000001154b5ac394

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of validate.gmca.be. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
be. present 45588 13 Verified
gmca.be. present 12124 13 Verified
validate.gmca.be. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31556926

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://validate.gmca.be/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://validate.gmca.be/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://validate.gmca.be/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~509 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
explain_validate_question ~96

Geeft een korte, neutrale toelichting en een concreet voorbeeld bij één specifieke Validate-vraag. Roep dit ENKEL aan wanneer de gebruiker zelf aangeeft de vraag niet te begrijpen of twijfelt over de betekenis — nooit standaard, en nooit om zelf een antwoord te suggereren of in te vullen.

NameTypeReqDescription
questionIdstringyesHet question-id uit get_validate_questions, bv. 'psf-1a'

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_validate_questions ~100

Geeft de 11 officiële Validate-vragen terug, elk met een neutrale toelichting en voorbeeld. BELANGRIJK: stel elke vraag individueel en letterlijk aan de eindgebruiker en verzamel per vraag een antwoord Ja/Deels/Nee. Vul de vragen NOOIT zelf in op basis van een projectbeschrijving. De toelichting/voorbeeld mag je meegeven als de gebruiker twijfelt, maar mag het antwoord nooit sturen.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

submit_validate_answers ~313

Verwerkt de Ja/Deels/Nee-antwoorden van de gebruiker op alle 11 vragen uit get_validate_questions en geeft het voorzichtige, kwalitatieve resultaat terug (geen scores, geen statuslabels). Vraag de gebruiker EERST expliciet om toestemming voor dataopslag (consent=true/false) vóórdat je dit tool aanroept — sla nooit stilzwijgend data op. Vraag ook sector/companySize/projectType/investmentRange als grove categorie (nooit bedrijfs- of projectnaam) — dit is vereist voor toekomstige publicatie per Rules v1.1 sectie 2, maar blijft optioneel als de gebruiker het niet wil delen.

NameTypeReqDescription
aiUsagestring–Rol van AI in dit project, indien de gebruiker dat wil delen
answersobjectyesMap van question-id naar 'ja' | 'deels' | 'nee', voor alle 11 vragen uit get_validate_questions
companySizestring–Aantal werknemers als bucket, optioneel
consentbooleanyesHeeft de gebruiker expliciet ingestemd met anonieme opname in de GMCA-dataset? Verplicht vooraf te vragen aan de gebruiker.
investmentRangestring–Geschatte investeringsomvang als bucket, optioneel
projectTypestring–Brede categorie van het type project, optioneel, nooit een projectnaam
sectorstring–Brede sector-categorie van de organisatie, optioneel, nooit een bedrijfsnaam

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate MCP server?

GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate is a hosted endpoint at https://validate.gmca.be/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · validate.gmca.be

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tridevils-gmca-certainty-matrix-validate 'https://validate.gmca.be/mcp'
Common questions

What is the GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate MCP server?

GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.tridevils/gmca-certainty-matrix-validate. GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate: 11 vragen om een project te screenen vóór investering. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://validate.gmca.be/mcp).

Is the GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate MCP server safe to use?

GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate MCP server expose?

GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate exposes 3 tools: get_validate_questions, explain_validate_question, submit_validate_answers. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 509 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate MCP server still maintained?

GMCA Certainty Matrix Validate is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.