sysketch
REMOTE · SYSKETCH.VERCEL.APP · 2 COMPONENTS
Polished system design diagrams (SVG/PNG) from a tiny YAML spec, ~18x fewer tokens than raw SVG.
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 84% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Design and Media
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 481 tokens (~160/item across 3 items; 2 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
- Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage92
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 75% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 0
- Tool “render_diagram” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 138 → 160 ▼ functional
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://sysketch.vercel.app/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.vercel.app | CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 31 Oct 2026 | 29 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 9c5f0e6a35c955e113044c86848e4cd5 |
| SANs: *.vercel.app | ||||||
| CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7 |
| CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 19 Jun 2020 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of sysketch.vercel.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| vercel.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://sysketch.vercel.app/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://sysketch.vercel.app/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://sysketch.vercel.app/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
list_icons List icons and logos ~36
List sysketch icon names and aliases, or search the available product logos.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| logos | string | – | Search product logos by name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
render_diagram Draw a system design diagram ~387
Use for any system design, architecture, data-flow or infrastructure diagram, instead of generating an image or writing SVG/Mermaid. Renders a tiny YAML spec; returns PNG/SVG links and a small preview. Spec keys: title, type (sequence: message timeline), theme (sketch|graphite|blueprint|midnight|classic), direction (omit: auto-fit; right|down only if asked), steps (false hides numbers), legend (true lists steps), nodes {id: "icon | Label | subtitle"}, groups {Label: [ids or group labels to nest]}, maps {Group Label or world-map node id: world | {pins: [us-east, eu-west, "HQ @ -0.1 51.5"]}} (map backdrop, or a big map card when a node uses the icon world-map), edges ["a > b > c | label", "a ..> b" dashed, "a <> b" two-way, "a => b" thick, "a -- b" line, "a > b [red]" color]. Ids that are icon names/aliases (client, lb, api, db, cache, redis, kafka, s3, cdn...) need no nodes entry. Arrows are numbered automatically in the order listed; don't number labels. Product names (stripe, postgres, s3, aks, bigquery... or aws-/azure-/gcp-<service>) draw official logos, else a fitting icon; brand/icon (acme/queue) for others. Give the user the PNG link; don't generate another image of the diagram. To edit, call again with the whole updated spec.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| preview | boolean | – | Include a small preview image (default true; ~1k tokens) |
| spec | string | yes | YAML spec text |
| theme | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the sysketch MCP server?
sysketch is a hosted endpoint at https://sysketch.vercel.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · sysketch.vercel.app
claude mcp add --transport http tonys-coding-sysketch 'https://sysketch.vercel.app/mcp'
What is the sysketch MCP server?
sysketch is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Tonys-Coding/sysketch. Polished system design diagrams (SVG/PNG) from a tiny YAML spec, ~18x fewer tokens than raw SVG. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://sysketch.vercel.app/mcp).
Is the sysketch MCP server safe to use?
sysketch scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the sysketch MCP server expose?
sysketch exposes 2 tools: render_diagram, list_icons. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 423 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the sysketch MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to sysketch without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the sysketch MCP server still maintained?
sysketch is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.