Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ScriptDocs MCP

NPM · @SCRIPTMASTERLABS/SCRIPTDOCS-MCP-SERVER · SCANNED SEP 25

Real, live npm/PyPI docs and OSV.dev vulnerability data for AI coding agents. No fake data.

0 this week 75 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 39 of 123 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
  • Repository check failed: the declared repository URL returned HTTP 404. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 63 days ago).Pass
  • Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1794 tokens (~358/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
  • Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the ScriptDocs MCP server?

ScriptDocs MCP runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server -- npx -y @scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server -- npx -y @scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server --command npx --arg -y --arg @scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server -t stdio -c npx -a -y @scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "timwal78-scriptdocs-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Sept 26 −2
    • Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
  • 23 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 22 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 16 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 25 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server@0.3.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 123 packages
Packages resolved 123
Stale 39
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~1,794 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
docs_check_vulnerabilities ~501

Check a real, specific package version against OSV.dev (Google-run, aggregates GitHub/PyPA/npm/RustSec advisories) — and, when a fix exists, automatically fetch that fixed version's README in the same call, so the result is "here's what's wrong" AND "here's exactly what upgrading looks like," not just a CVE list you have to research further yourself. This is a live query against OSV.dev's public API for the exact package+version given. It never estimates or guesses risk — if OSV has no advisories on record for that version, this correctly reports zero vulnerabilities rather than implying danger that isn't documented. Note: this tool is more limited than dedicated vulnerability-intelligence tools (e.g. VulnCheck, Snyk) — it reports what OSV.dev has on file, not exploit activity or threat intelligence. Args: - ecosystem ('npm' | 'pypi' | 'cargo') - package_name (string): exact package name - version (string, optional): specific version to check; defaults to the latest published version - include_fix_docs (boolean, default true): also fetch the README for the version that fixes the found vulnerabilities Returns JSON with: vulnerability_count, vulnerabilities (array of {id, summary, severity, aliases, fixed_in, references}), recommended_fix (null, or {version, readme, truncated, source_url} for the version that resolves the found issues), source_url, fetched_at. Error Handling: - Returns "Error: ..." if the package doesn't exist or OSV.dev can't be reached - vulnerability_count: 0 with an empty array is a normal, valid result — not an error - If fetching the fix's README fails, recommended_fix is null rather than the whole call failing — the vulnerability data itself is never withheld because of it

NameTypeReqDescription
ecosystemstringyesWhich package registry the version belongs to: 'npm', 'pypi', or 'cargo'.
include_fix_docsboolean–When a vulnerability is found with a known fixed version, also fetch that version's README so the response includes what upgrading actually looks like. Set false to skip the extra fetch.
package_namestringyesExact package name as published on the registry.
versionstring–Specific version to check. Defaults to the current latest published version if omitted.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docs_get_package_info ~274

Fetch real, current metadata for a package directly from the npm registry, PyPI JSON API, or crates.io. This tool makes a live HTTP request to the actual registry (registry.npmjs.org, pypi.org, or crates.io) at call time. It never returns cached, guessed, or simulated data — if the package doesn't exist, it returns an explicit error rather than a plausible-looking fabrication. Args: - ecosystem ('npm' | 'pypi' | 'cargo'): which registry to query - package_name (string): exact package name, e.g. "zod", "fastapi", or "serde" Returns JSON with: name, latest_version, description, homepage, repository, source_url (the exact registry URL the data came from, for verification), fetched_at (ISO timestamp). Error Handling: - Returns "Error: package not found" if the registry has no such package - Returns "Error: registry request failed" on network/HTTP errors

NameTypeReqDescription
ecosystemstringyesWhich package registry to query: 'npm', 'pypi', or 'cargo' (Rust/crates.io).
package_namestringyesExact package name as published on the registry, e.g. 'express', 'requests', or 'serde'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docs_get_readme ~315

Fetch the real README/description for a package, straight from the registry — not a summary, not a paraphrase, not AI-generated. For npm this reads the registry's stored README, falling back to the published README.md file via jsDelivr if the registry copy is missing (verbatim markdown). For PyPI this reads the exact long_description shown on the package's PyPI page (verbatim). For Cargo (Rust/crates.io) this reads crates.io's stored README — note: crates.io only stores a pre-rendered HTML version, not the original markdown source, so this is that HTML converted to plain text, not byte-for-byte source. Args: - ecosystem ('npm' | 'pypi' | 'cargo') - package_name (string): exact package name - version (string, optional): specific version; defaults to latest Returns JSON with: readme (truncated to 12000 chars if longer — check 'truncated'), truncated (boolean), source_url (exact URL fetched, for verification), fetched_at. Error Handling: - Returns "Error: ..." if the package or its README cannot be found — never fabricates content to fill the gap.

NameTypeReqDescription
ecosystemstringyesWhich package registry to query: 'npm', 'pypi', or 'cargo'.
package_namestringyesExact package name as published on the registry.
versionstring–Specific version to fetch. Defaults to the latest published version if omitted.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docs_resolve_library ~353

Turn a fuzzy or partial name into real, ranked candidate package names, using the registry's own live search index — not a guess at what the package is probably called. For npm this queries registry.npmjs.org's actual search API (the same one npmjs.com uses). For Cargo this queries crates.io's real search endpoint. For PyPI: there is currently no official PyPI search API (XML-RPC search was permanently disabled in 2022 and never replaced) — calling this with ecosystem 'pypi' returns an explicit message saying so rather than a fabricated or scraped result, along with a suggestion to use the exact package name with docs_get_package_info instead. Args: - ecosystem ('npm' | 'pypi' | 'cargo') - query (string): the name or description to resolve, e.g. "react" or "async http client" - max_results (number, 1-10, default 5) Returns JSON with: candidates (array of {name, version, description, score, url}), source_url, fetched_at. Error Handling: - ecosystem 'pypi' always returns an explanatory message, not an error and not fabricated results - Returns "Error: ..." only for actual npm/crates.io request failures

NameTypeReqDescription
ecosystemstringyesWhich registry to search: 'npm', 'pypi', or 'cargo'. Note: PyPI has no official search API (see limitation below).
max_resultsinteger–Maximum number of candidates to return.
querystringyesNatural-language or partial name to resolve, e.g. 'react', 'http client for python', 'serde'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docs_search_docs ~351

Search for keywords inside a package's real README/docs and return verbatim matching snippets with surrounding context. This does keyword matching over the actual fetched document (registry README for npm, long description for PyPI, README-derived text for Cargo) — it does not summarize or paraphrase, and it does not answer from general knowledge. If no matches are found, it says so rather than guessing at an answer. Args: - ecosystem ('npm' | 'pypi' | 'cargo') - package_name (string): exact package name - query (string): keyword(s) to search for, e.g. "rate limit" or "async client" - max_snippets (number, 1-20, default 5): cap on returned matches - version (string, optional): specific version to search; defaults to latest Returns JSON with: snippets (array of {match, context, line_hint}), source_url, fetched_at. Error Handling: - Returns "Error: ..." if the package/docs can't be fetched - Returns an empty snippets array (not an error) if the docs were fetched successfully but the query has no matches

NameTypeReqDescription
ecosystemstringyesWhich package registry to query: 'npm', 'pypi', or 'cargo'.
max_snippetsinteger–Maximum number of matching snippets to return.
package_namestringyesExact package name as published on the registry.
querystringyesKeyword(s) to search for inside the package's real documentation, e.g. 'authentication middleware'.
versionstring–Specific version to search within. Defaults to the latest published version if omitted.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the ScriptDocs MCP server?

ScriptDocs MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Timwal78/scriptdocs-mcp-server. Real, live npm/PyPI docs and OSV.dev vulnerability data for AI coding agents. No fake data. This page covers its npm package (@scriptmasterlabs/scriptdocs-mcp-server).

Is the ScriptDocs MCP server safe to use?

ScriptDocs MCP scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 25 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ScriptDocs MCP server expose?

ScriptDocs MCP exposes 5 tools: docs_get_package_info, docs_get_readme, docs_search_docs, docs_check_vulnerabilities, docs_resolve_library. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,794 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the ScriptDocs MCP server still maintained?

ScriptDocs MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the ScriptDocs MCP server under?

ScriptDocs MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.