Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide

NPM · @TIGERDATA/PG-AIGUIDE · 3 COMPONENTS

Comprehensive PostgreSQL documentation and best practices, including ecosystem tools

−2 this week 47 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 25% of npm servers

Category Databases

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security93
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known medium-severity CVE affects glob 10.5.0, reached via @tigerdata/mcp-boilerplate > @opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node > @opentelemetry/resource-detector-gcp > gcp-metadata > gaxios > rimraf > glob. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • Dependency health was assessed across the 306 of 313 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to timescale/pg-aiguide). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 61 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because our sandbox has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 31 Oct 26 −2
    • CVE-2026-118764 affects this package: medium ▼ security
    • CVE-2026-118773 affects this package: medium ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: partial → fail ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 25 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 23 Oct 26 0
    • CVE-2026-97058 no longer affects this package ▲ security
    • Known CVEs: Known CVEs were checked across the 306 of 313 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. security
  • 12 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 11 Oct 26 0
    • CVE-2026-97058 affects this package ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: A known CVE affects sprintf-js, but no fixed version has been published, so there is nothing to upgrade to. security
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@tigerdata/pg-aiguide@0.6.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo timescale/pg-aiguide
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/timescale/pg-aiguide/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.6.1
Rekor log index 2715118280
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:fca8cbb8c507b2087c5dd9fb968be3acbc217f7799cc7b16895967d9195b9d5640e3d180b18c3ba30c14b6ca25f1467530217ab5ebb4efdaf60cf3060

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 2 findings
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 CVE-2026-118773 medium yes
GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 CVE-2026-118764 medium yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 306 packages
Packages resolved 306
Deprecated 7
Stale 67
Tree resolution Partial

The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.

Install

How do I install the io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide MCP server?

io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @tigerdata/pg-aiguide. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @tigerdata/pg-aiguide

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add timescale-pg-aiguide -- npx -y @tigerdata/pg-aiguide
Common questions

What is the io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide MCP server?

io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide. Comprehensive PostgreSQL documentation and best practices, including ecosystem tools. This page covers its npm package (@tigerdata/pg-aiguide).

Is the io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide MCP server safe to use?

io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide scores 47 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 2 known advisories against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Is the io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide MCP server still maintained?

io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide MCP server under?

io.github.timescale/pg-aiguide declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.