China Law MCP
PYPI · CHINA-LAW-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS
Search 23,995 Chinese statutes and verify citations to catch LLM-fabricated references.
Available components
Last scanned (17 hours ago)
Scores higher than 3% of PyPI servers
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security48
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- Known CVEs were checked across the 31 of 32 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- Dependency health was assessed across the 31 of 32 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL redirects; it must resolve directly. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 31 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema for these checks to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until we can run it. How we score packages →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 31 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 30 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 23 Oct 26 0
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- 22 Oct 26 −5
- Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Source repository: pass → fail ▼ security
- 4 Oct 26 38
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/china-law-mcp@0.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 31 packages
| Packages resolved | 31 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 2 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Partial |
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
How do I install the China Law MCP server?
China Law MCP runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx china-law-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · china-law-mcp
claude mcp add thu-lawyer-china-law-mcp -- uvx china-law-mcp
What is the China Law MCP server?
China Law MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.thu-lawyer/china-law-mcp. Search 23,995 Chinese statutes and verify citations to catch LLM-fabricated references. This page covers its PyPI package (china-law-mcp).
Is the China Law MCP server safe to use?
China Law MCP scores 18 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Is the China Law MCP server still maintained?
China Law MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the China Law MCP server under?
China Law MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.