io.github.thegridwork/aiact
NPM · GRIDWORK-AIACT · SCANNED SEP 22
Scan codebases for AI usage, classify risk, generate EU AI Act compliance reports.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 31 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 170 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 348 tokens (~87/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.thegridwork/aiact MCP server?
io.github.thegridwork/aiact runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y gridwork-aiact. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · gridwork-aiact
claude mcp add thegridwork-aiact -- npx -y gridwork-aiact
{
"mcpServers": {
"thegridwork-aiact": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"gridwork-aiact"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"thegridwork-aiact": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"gridwork-aiact"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add thegridwork-aiact -- npx -y gridwork-aiact
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"thegridwork-aiact": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"gridwork-aiact"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add thegridwork-aiact --command npx --arg -y --arg gridwork-aiact
mcp_servers:
thegridwork-aiact:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "gridwork-aiact"] {
"McpServers": {
"thegridwork-aiact": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"gridwork-aiact"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add thegridwork-aiact -t stdio -c npx -a -y gridwork-aiact
{
"mcpServers": {
"thegridwork-aiact": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"gridwork-aiact"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 22 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.77 functional
- 15 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/gridwork-aiact@1.0.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 96 packages
| Packages resolved | 96 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
classify_system ~128
Classify the EU AI Act risk level for a specific AI system based on its type and use case. Helps determine which obligations apply.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| makes_decisions_about_people | boolean | – | Whether outputs affect decisions about individuals |
| processes_personal_data | boolean | – | Whether the system processes personal data |
| system_name | string | yes | Name of the AI system (e.g., 'OpenAI GPT-4', 'Custom PyTorch model') |
| use_case | string | yes | Description of how the system is used |
| use_domain | string | – | The domain where the AI system is deployed |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_inventory ~68
Generate a formal EU AI Act inventory document for a project. Produces a structured inventory suitable for compliance records, covering all detected AI systems with risk classifications and documentation requirements.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| organization | string | – | Organization name for the inventory header |
| path | string | yes | Absolute path to the project directory |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
quick_check ~40
Quick scan to count AI systems in a project without full compliance analysis. Faster than scan_project.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | yes | Absolute path to the project directory |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
scan_project ~112
Scan a project directory for AI system usage and generate an EU AI Act compliance report. Detects LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, etc.), ML frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn), computer vision, NLP, embeddings, and more. Classifies risk level and identifies compliance gaps against the August 2, 2026 deadline.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | string | – | Output format |
| path | string | yes | Absolute path to the project directory to scan |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.thegridwork/aiact MCP server?
io.github.thegridwork/aiact is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.thegridwork/aiact. Scan codebases for AI usage, classify risk, generate EU AI Act compliance reports. This page covers its npm package (gridwork-aiact).
Is the io.github.thegridwork/aiact MCP server safe to use?
io.github.thegridwork/aiact scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 22 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.thegridwork/aiact MCP server expose?
io.github.thegridwork/aiact exposes 4 tools: scan_project, quick_check, generate_inventory, classify_system. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 348 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.thegridwork/aiact MCP server still maintained?
io.github.thegridwork/aiact is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.thegridwork/aiact MCP server under?
io.github.thegridwork/aiact declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.