Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

OmniProvider

REMOTE · MCP.OMNIDEV.TECH

Pay-per-call LLM API for agents: model catalog, pricing, unpaid x402/MPP quotes, how-to-pay.

Available components

+4 this week 80 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 81% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 375 tokens (~93/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage90
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 71% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 2 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "omniprovider_get_quote" implies "send" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.omnidev.tech/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mcp.omnidev.tech CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 16 Oct 2026 14 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6a02ccfbf8382dadb7d875cc129f4bb7495
SANs: mcp.omnidev.tech
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.omnidev.tech. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
tech. present 2185 13 Verified
omnidev.tech. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.omnidev.tech/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.omnidev.tech/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://mcp.omnidev.tech/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~324 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
omniprovider_get_pricing ~81

Returns prices: fixed per-call prices of the nano, small and brief routes, and per-token prices of the catalog. With a model and token counts it also returns an estimated cost and the minimum charge per rail.

NameTypeReqDescription
input_tokensinteger––
modelstring–Catalog model id.
output_tokensinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

omniprovider_get_quote ~118

Sends one unpaid request to a paid route and returns the 402 payment requirements (amount, currency, network, payee, protocol). No payment is made and no credential is sent; the response is the quote for that exact request body.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodyobjectyesJSON request body the quote is computed for (messages or prompt; for /v1/chat/completions also model and max_tokens).
routestringyesPaid route path. /v1/* accepts MPP, /x402/* accepts x402.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

omniprovider_how_to_pay ~67

Returns the payment flow for a rail: endpoint URL, required headers, the client nonce format, and client commands. Payment is produced by the caller's own wallet tooling; this server holds no keys.

NameTypeReqDescription
railstring–Payment rail; all rails when omitted.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

omniprovider_list_models ~58

Returns the public catalog: model ids, context windows, maximum output tokens, price per million input and output tokens, accepted payment rails and prepaid packs that can be bought now.

NameTypeReqDescription
tierstring–Optional filter by catalog tier.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the OmniProvider MCP server?

OmniProvider is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.omnidev.tech/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.omnidev.tech

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tech-omnidev-omniprovider 'https://mcp.omnidev.tech/mcp'
Common questions

What is the OmniProvider MCP server?

OmniProvider is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as tech.omnidev/omniprovider. Pay-per-call LLM API for agents: model catalog, pricing, unpaid x402/MPP quotes, how-to-pay. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.omnidev.tech/mcp).

Is the OmniProvider MCP server safe to use?

OmniProvider scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the OmniProvider MCP server expose?

OmniProvider exposes 4 tools: omniprovider_list_models, omniprovider_get_pricing, omniprovider_get_quote, omniprovider_how_to_pay. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 324 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the OmniProvider MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to OmniProvider without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the OmniProvider MCP server still maintained?

OmniProvider is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.