Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

tech.distribution/distribution

REMOTE · APP.DISTRIBUTION.TECH · 2 COMPONENTS

Priced X creators, campaigns from a goal, plan changes, mandated payment links, proof and results.

+3 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 946 tokens (~105/item across 9 items; 6 tools + 3 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management58
  • Stability check failed: schema churn in the 20 days we've observed: 0 tool removals, 0 breaking changes, 1 auth/transport breaks, 0 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 55 to 58.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 45 to 48.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 38 to 42.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 32 to 35.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 25 to 28.

  • 26 Oct 26 0
    • Server version: 1.36.0 → 1.37.0 functional
  • 25 Oct 26 +1
    • Server version: 1.35.1 → 1.36.0 functional
  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Server version: 1.35.0 → 1.35.1 functional
    • Server version: 1.34.0 → 1.35.0 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://app.distribution.tech/api/mcp/guest

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=app.distribution.tech CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 6 Oct 2026 4 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5f8e5699735740d3efa6b1fd5c4ef101713
SANs: app.distribution.tech
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of app.distribution.tech. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
tech. present 2185 13 Verified
distribution.tech. present 2371 13 Verified
app.distribution.tech. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://app.distribution.tech/api/mcp/guest Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://app.distribution.tech/api/mcp/guest HTTPS enforced 308 https://app.distribution.tech/api/mcp/guest
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~689 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
brain_get ~92

A guest has no saved company context, so as a guest this answers the empty context (version 0, nothing confirmed) with claim, where to sign in and confirm your company in the workspace. With an account: your company context as confirmed (name, summary, audience), its version and the version history. Optionally one section.

NameTypeReqDescription
sectionstring–One section. Leave out for the whole context.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

feedback_send ~162

Needs an account. A signed-in agent tells the distribution team about a problem or an idea with any API key. As a guest this sends nothing: it answers with claim, where to sign in and create a key, so the report can be sent from an account.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextobject–Where it happened: the tool, request id, URL, error code and HTTP status. Other keys are dropped.
detailsstringyesWhat happened (the exact error), how to repeat it (the call), what you expected. Identifiers only.
kindstringyesbug, gap (a missing capability or an empty or wrong field), idea, praise or other.
titlestringyesOne line: what happened or what is missing.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

guest_status ~49

No account needed. What this connection can do without a key: which tools answer now, which need an account, the guest limits, and claim, where to sign in and create a key in Developers.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

inventory ~84

No account needed. As a guest (no audience on file): how much of the network is on sale today, per channel: approved creators, posts on sale at a current price, and whether coverage is strong or thin. Counts only, never a creator's identity. resolve_audience narrows it to an audience you describe; with an account it is measured against your own audience.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

plan_quote_guest ~185

No account needed. The all-in price range a brand pays per post in one format (post, quote or thread) across every creator on sale now, and that range times the number of posts you name (1 to 50), with how many creators sell that format and when the numbers were read. A guest gets 3 quotes in any 7 days from one address (quotes_left says how many remain); the next is refused with rate_limited (reason guest_quote_limit, retry_after and resets_at). A range, not a plan: a plan names creators and dates and needs an account (claim says where to sign in and create a key).

NameTypeReqDescription
formatstring–post (an original post), quote (a quote repost) or thread. Default post.
postsinteger–How many posts, 1 to 50. Default 1.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resolve_audience ~117

No account needed for a profile you describe (product, audience, geography; at least a product or an audience): the audience segments it matches and the coverage per channel, the same check a campaign gets when it starts. Counts only, never a creator's identity. The fit for a campaign of yours (intent_id) needs an account.

NameTypeReqDescription
audiencestring–Who it is for, in your words.
geographystring–Where the audience is, or worldwide.
productstring–What is being promoted.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the tech.distribution/distribution MCP server?

tech.distribution/distribution is a hosted endpoint at https://app.distribution.tech/api/mcp/guest, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · app.distribution.tech

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tech-distribution-distribution 'https://app.distribution.tech/api/mcp/guest'
Common questions

What is the tech.distribution/distribution MCP server?

tech.distribution/distribution is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as tech.distribution/distribution. Priced X creators, campaigns from a goal, plan changes, mandated payment links, proof and results. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://app.distribution.tech/api/mcp/guest).

Is the tech.distribution/distribution MCP server safe to use?

tech.distribution/distribution scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the tech.distribution/distribution MCP server expose?

tech.distribution/distribution exposes 6 tools: inventory, resolve_audience, brain_get, feedback_send, plan_quote_guest, guest_status. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 689 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the tech.distribution/distribution MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to tech.distribution/distribution without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the tech.distribution/distribution MCP server still maintained?

tech.distribution/distribution is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.