Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Forbiz

NPM · FORBIZ-MCP

CRM for AI agents: commitments, expected signals, evidence and outcomes agents resume.

Available components

+3 this week 77 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 55% of npm servers

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 92 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1728 tokens (~86/item across 20 items; 20 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage83
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 50% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 20 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 21 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +3
    • Stability: unverified → 0.27 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/forbiz-mcp@0.1.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 92 packages
Packages resolved 92
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 20 exposed · ~1,601 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
forbiz_action_history ~41

Chronological changes of one action and who made each one, agent or human (GET /actions/{id}/history).

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_add_evidence ~59

Append what you observed, were told, inferred or decided (POST /context/evidence). Append-only epistemic history: nothing becomes workspace truth automatically, and a contradiction never erases what it contradicts.

NameTypeReqDescription
itemsarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_agents ~63

Every agent of this workspace with its activity and a plain track record over the actions it created: created, executed, signal recorded, outcomes, overdue (GET /agents). Counts only, no ranking.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysinteger–Window in days, default 30

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_check_signal ~155

Record that you looked for the expected signal (POST /actions/{id}/signal-checks). not_found_in_source REQUIRES source and period: it says where you looked and when, never that a third party did not answer. found closes nothing; link the signal with forbiz_record_signal. cannot_check REQUIRES reason.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesAction id
looked_forstring––
notestring––
periodobject–The time window you checked
reasonstring––
resultstringyes–
sourceobject–Where you looked, e.g. { kind: 'email_thread', detail: 'Re: quote' }

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_claim_link ~43

A link the human owner opens to take ownership of a provisional workspace (POST /claim-link). Give it to the owner; the agent keeps working after the claim.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_close ~48

Resolve an action with its outcome (POST /actions/{id}/close-loop).

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–
learningNotestring––
outcomeStatusstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_close_without_signal ~68

Close an action that will not get a signal, saying why (POST /actions/{id}/close-without-signal). Silence is not rejection: say what you know.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–
learningNotestring––
reasonstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_commit ~303

Record an action you will take or took, with the signal you expect back (POST /actions). Always send a commitmentKey (a short stable id for the objective, e.g. 'acme/quote-followup') and expectedSignalAt. A second open commitment with the same key is refused 409 COMMITMENT_ALREADY_OPEN and the body returns the open one: that is how you resume. A look-alike is refused 409 POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE: resend with confirm_new true only if it is a different objective.

NameTypeReqDescription
commitmentKeystring–Stable id of the objective this commitment serves (recommended)
confirm_newboolean–Override a POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE refusal
descriptionstringyesWhat the action is, in one sentence
dueAtstring–When the action itself is due; without it the action never becomes overdue
expectedSignalstring–What you expect to see if it worked, e.g. 'Dana replies with a date'
expectedSignalAtstring–When the expected signal should have arrived
expectedSignalSourceobject–Where the expected signal will appear
projectIdstring–UUID of an existing project in this workspace
roiobject–What it is worth, each dimension 0-5. Optional; never inferred by Forbiz
verbstring––
whyThisMovestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_find_evidence ~75

Recover evidence by text or subject (GET /context/evidence). Each item carries its source and its contradiction and supersession pointers.

NameTypeReqDescription
materialOnlyboolean––
qstring–Full text over subject and content
statusstring––
subjectstring–Subject contains this

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_get_action ~41

Full state of one action: expected signal, dates, lifecycle, outcome (GET /actions/{id}).

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesAction id

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_mark_executed ~104

Record that the action really happened (POST /actions/{id}/execute). Only when it did: never mark as executed without evidence that the act occurred.

NameTypeReqDescription
executedAtstring–When it really happened; at most 5 minutes in the future
expectedSignalAtstring–ISO 8601 date-time, e.g. 2026-10-15T14:00:00Z
idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_me ~32

Workspace, agent identity, capabilities, plan and limits of the current credential (GET /me). Call this first.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_next ~26

The single next thing that needs attention, with its handoff (GET /next).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_postpone ~74

Push the date the signal is expected (POST /actions/{id}/postpone).

NameTypeReqDescription
expectedSignalAtstringyesISO 8601 date-time, e.g. 2026-10-15T14:00:00Z
idstringyes–
reasonstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_prompts ~62

Everything waiting, grouped (needs_decision, needs_feedback, waiting, needs_review_date), each with timing.available_commands: what you may do right now (GET /prompts).

NameTypeReqDescription
groupstring–Only one group, e.g. needs_feedback

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_record_signal ~75

Record what actually happened after the action (POST /signals). A signal is written once; a correction is a new record.

NameTypeReqDescription
actionIdstringyes–
actualSignalstringyesWhat actually came back, in plain words
learningNotestring––
outcomeStatusstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_request ~109

Escape hatch for any other route of the Forbiz Agent API (https://forbiz.io/openapi.json): projects, decisions, delegations, outreach, policies, export, purchases. The path is relative to the API base, e.g. '/projects' or '/decisions/recommendation'. Forbiz enforces capabilities server-side.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodyobject––
methodstringyes–
pathstringyesRoute path starting with /
queryobject––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_search ~72

Full-text search across actions, evidence, people, organizations, projects, outreach and decisions (GET /search). To resume a commitment by its key, use forbiz_commit with the same commitmentKey instead: the 409 returns it.

NameTypeReqDescription
qstringyesSearch terms
typestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_start ~126

Open a provisional Forbiz workspace with no account, no email and no human (POST /bootstrap). The credential is stored locally by this server and never shown. Returns the workspace, the trial limits and a claim link for the owner. Call it once; if a credential already exists it refuses unless replace is true.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_namestringyesYour name as an agent, e.g. 'Acme ops agent'
replaceboolean–Open a new workspace even if a credential is already stored
workspace_namestring–Name of the business or workspace

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

forbiz_state ~25

Overview of the workspace: queues, counts and next priorities (GET /state).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Forbiz MCP server?

Forbiz runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y forbiz-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · forbiz-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add tbernabo-forbiz-mcp -- npx -y forbiz-mcp
Common questions

What is the Forbiz MCP server?

Forbiz is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.tbernabo/forbiz-mcp. CRM for AI agents: commitments, expected signals, evidence and outcomes agents resume. This page covers its npm package (forbiz-mcp).

Is the Forbiz MCP server safe to use?

Forbiz scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Forbiz MCP server expose?

Forbiz exposes 20 tools: forbiz_start, forbiz_me, forbiz_claim_link, forbiz_next, forbiz_prompts, and 15 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,601 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Forbiz MCP server still maintained?

Forbiz is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Forbiz MCP server under?

Forbiz declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.