Partelisto
REMOTE · MCP.PARTELISTO.ES · SCANNED SEP 20
Guest check-in, SES.HOSPEDAJES status, and booking creation for Spanish vacation rentals. No PII.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 6 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 863 tokens (~107/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
- Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the Partelisto MCP server?
Partelisto is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.partelisto.es
claude mcp add --transport http targetgrps-partelisto-mcp 'https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"targetgrps-partelisto-mcp": {
"url": "https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"targetgrps-partelisto-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.targetgrps-partelisto-mcp] url = "https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"targetgrps-partelisto-mcp": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add targetgrps-partelisto-mcp --url 'https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
targetgrps-partelisto-mcp:
url: "https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"targetgrps-partelisto-mcp": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add targetgrps-partelisto-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"targetgrps-partelisto-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.partelisto.es | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 31 Aug 2026 | 29 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5d64476530e587106e94c4acd76f486cd7d |
| SANs: mcp.partelisto.es | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.partelisto.es. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| es. | present | 54404 | 8 | Verified |
| partelisto.es. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
create_booking ~194
Creates a new booking (a check-in workflow) for one of the host's properties. Requires the write permission granted separately during sign-in. Ask the host to confirm the property and dates before calling this. Does not email the guest — call send_guest_checkin_link afterwards if a link should go out now.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| checkIn | string | yes | Check-in date, yyyy-MM-dd. |
| checkOut | string | yes | Check-out date, yyyy-MM-dd. |
| guestEmail | string|null | – | Guest email, optional. |
| guestName | string|null | – | Guest name, optional. |
| guestPhone | string|null | – | Guest phone, optional. |
| propertyId | string | yes | The property id, from list_properties. |
| templateId | string|null | – | Check-in template id. Omit if the property has exactly one active (non-archived) template — it is picked automatically; otherwise this is required. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_attention_required ~111
Scans the signed-in host's most recent bookings (up to 50) and returns only what needs action right now: stays that are imminent or under way where the guest has not completed check-in, and bookings whose SES.HOSPEDAJES submission failed. Empty list means nothing needs attention within the window. No guest PII.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| arrivalWindowDays | integer | – | How many days ahead counts as "imminent" (a negative gap means the stay already started). Defaults to 3. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_guest_form_status ~45
Whether the guest has completed the check-in form for a booking the host owns (None or Submitted). No form content.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bookingId | string | yes | The booking id. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_usage_summary ~34
The signed-in host's plan tier, trial status, and this month's usage against plan limits (properties, templates, bookings).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_bookings ~97
Lists the signed-in host's bookings (newest first), paged. Returns id, property id, check-in/check-out dates, status, and whether a check-in link and guest contact exist — never the guest's email, phone, or documents.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| skip | integer | – | Rows to skip, for paging. Defaults to 0. |
| take | integer | – | Rows to return, max 50. Defaults to 20. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_properties ~51
Lists the signed-in host's properties: id, name, address, municipality/province, and whether it is archived. No guest data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| includeArchived | boolean | – | Include archived properties. Defaults to false. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_ses_statuses ~73
SES.HOSPEDAJES (police registration) submission status for a set of bookings the host owns: status, attempts, last error, and the official reference once accepted. Bookings with no submission yet are omitted.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bookingIds | array | yes | Booking ids to check, up to 50. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
send_guest_checkin_link ~139
Sends (or resends) the guest check-in link by email for a booking the host owns. This is a real action with a side effect: it emails the guest and, on resend, invalidates the guest's previous link. Requires the write permission granted separately during sign-in. Ask the host to confirm before calling this.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bookingId | string | yes | The booking id. |
| string|null | – | Guest email to send to. Omit to use the email already on the booking. | |
| guestName | string|null | – | Guest name, for the email greeting. Omit to keep the name already on the booking. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Partelisto MCP server?
Partelisto is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.TargetGrps/partelisto-mcp. Guest check-in, SES.HOSPEDAJES status, and booking creation for Spanish vacation rentals. No PII. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.partelisto.es/mcp).
Is the Partelisto MCP server safe to use?
Partelisto scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Partelisto MCP server expose?
Partelisto exposes 8 tools: create_booking, send_guest_checkin_link, list_ses_statuses, get_guest_form_status, list_bookings, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 744 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Partelisto MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Partelisto without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Partelisto MCP server still maintained?
Partelisto is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.