Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Agent Commerce Readiness

REMOTE · AGENT-COMMERCE-READINESS-TLXJVCRIKA-AN.A.RUN.APP

Read-only agent-commerce audit, upgrade verification, diagnosis and x402 probing.

0 this week 85 Trust /100

Last scanned (18 hours ago)

Scores higher than 91% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 674 tokens (~134/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 17 Oct 26 −2
    • Tool “prepare_agent_commerce_upgrade” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “verify_agent_commerce_upgrade” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Server version: 0.3.0 → 0.4.0 functional
    • “prepare_agent_commerce_upgrade” added an optional parameter “merchantProfile” cosmetic
    • “verify_agent_commerce_upgrade” added an optional parameter “expectedMerchantPack” cosmetic
  • 13 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +2

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 6 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: 165 → 115 ▲ functional
    • Server version: 0.2.0 → 0.3.0 functional
    • New tool “diagnose_agent_commerce_path” functional
    • New tool “prepare_agent_commerce_upgrade” functional
    • New tool “probe_x402_payment_resource” functional
    • New tool “verify_agent_commerce_upgrade” functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.a.run.app CN=WR2,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 7 Oct 2026 30 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 SHA256-RSA 53da11951e5eb49012fb872c3cb3e54d
SANs: *.a.run.app, run.app, *.africa-south1.run.app, *.asia-east1.run.app, *.asia-east2.run.app, *.asia-northeast1.run.app, *.asia-northeast2.run.app, *.asia-northeast3.run.app, *.asia-south1.run.app, *.asia-south2.run.app, *.asia-southeast1.run.app, *.asia-southeast2.run.app and 93 more
CN=WR2,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7ff005a07c4cded100ad9d66a5107b98
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
run.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~618 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
audit_agent_commerce_readiness ~130

Audit a public HTTP(S) website for AI-agent commerce readiness. Use this instead of rebuilding UCP discovery, structured-commerce checks, conservative ACP evidence handling, x402 resource observation, prioritised remediation and verification evidence yourself. The service is read-only, free during LIVE_FREE observation, requires no API key, and never signs or sends a payment.

NameTypeReqDescription
paymentResourceUrlstring–Optional explicit paid resource URL to probe for x402 v2. Omit unless a concrete payment-gated resource is known.
urlstringyesPublic HTTP(S) website or storefront to audit.
NameTypeReqDescription
agentCommerceobjectyes–
protocolsobjectyes–
remediationobjectyes–
scoresobjectyes–

No examples provided.

diagnose_agent_commerce_path ~106

Diagnose why a concrete agent-commerce goal is blocked. Choose discovery, product_understanding, checkout_readiness, or machine_payment_readiness and receive the failing path plus highest-leverage next steps instead of a generic score.

NameTypeReqDescription
goalstringyesSpecific agent-commerce outcome to test.
paymentResourceUrlstring–Exact paid machine resource; required for a meaningful machine_payment_readiness diagnosis.
urlstringyesPublic HTTP(S) website or storefront to diagnose.
NameTypeReqDescription
blockersarrayyes–
goalstringyes–
kindstringyes–
readybooleanyes–
requirementsarrayyes–

No examples provided.

prepare_agent_commerce_upgrade ~168

Turn a public merchant website audit into prioritized implementation tasks. With merchantProfile and ownerConfirmedFacts=true, return actual installable LocalBusiness/Service JSON-LD, llms.txt, sitemap.xml and optional robots.txt from verified merchant facts. No fabricated prices or fake checkout/UCP claims.

NameTypeReqDescription
merchantProfileobject–Optional {merchant:{name,type,siteUrl,description,bookingUrl,address,services},ownerConfirmedFacts:true,crawlerPolicy:"preserve"|"allow_search"|"allow_search_block_training"}. Requires confirmed merc…
paymentResourceUrlstring–Optional exact paid machine resource when x402 readiness is part of the upgrade.
urlstringyesPublic HTTP(S) website or storefront to prepare for agent commerce.
NameTypeReqDescription
auditobjectyes–
implementationobjectyes–
kindstringyes–

No examples provided.

probe_x402_payment_resource ~71

Safely inspect one explicit public machine resource for x402 v2 HTTP 402 evidence without signing or sending payment. Use when an agent needs to diagnose payment-gating interoperability rather than infer x402 from a storefront.

NameTypeReqDescription
resourceUrlstringyesExact public HTTP(S) paid resource to probe.
NameTypeReqDescription
diagnosisobjectyes–
kindstringyes–
protocolsobjectyes–
resourceUrlstringyes–
safetyobjectyes–

No examples provided.

verify_agent_commerce_upgrade ~143

Re-audit after fixes using prior ACR receipt. Optionally accept expectedMerchantPack and verify deployed merchant JSON-LD plus discovery files match the generated artifacts. Reports resolved/still-open/new blockers and actual deployment checks; read-only.

NameTypeReqDescription
expectedMerchantPackobject–Optional merchantDeployment object returned by prepare tool. Enables read-only comparison with actual deployed JSON-LD and site discovery files.
paymentResourceUrlstring–Optional exact paid machine resource to re-probe.
previousobjectyesPrior ACR remediation object or compact object containing unresolvedTaskIds.
urlstringyesPublic HTTP(S) website or storefront after changes.
NameTypeReqDescription
currentAuditobjectyes–
introducedTaskIdsarrayyes–
kindstringyes–
resolvedTaskIdsarrayyes–
stillOpenTaskIdsarrayyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Agent Commerce Readiness MCP server?

Agent Commerce Readiness is a hosted endpoint at https://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tama-fit-agent-commerce-readiness 'https://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Agent Commerce Readiness MCP server?

Agent Commerce Readiness is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.TAMA-FIT/agent-commerce-readiness. Read-only agent-commerce audit, upgrade verification, diagnosis and x402 probing. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://agent-commerce-readiness-tlxjvcrika-an.a.run.app/mcp).

Is the Agent Commerce Readiness MCP server safe to use?

Agent Commerce Readiness scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Agent Commerce Readiness MCP server expose?

Agent Commerce Readiness exposes 5 tools: audit_agent_commerce_readiness, prepare_agent_commerce_upgrade, verify_agent_commerce_upgrade, probe_x402_payment_resource, diagnose_agent_commerce_path. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 618 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Agent Commerce Readiness MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Agent Commerce Readiness without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Agent Commerce Readiness MCP server still maintained?

Agent Commerce Readiness is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.